Subject Areas :

مهدی روغنی ¹ , محمود مدیری ² , کیامرث فتحی هفشجانی ³ , ابوتراب علیرضایی ⁴

1 - گروه مدیریت صنعتی، واحد تهران جنوب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران ،ایران
2 - گروه مدیریت صنعتی، واحد تهران جنوب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران ،ایران
3 - گروه مدیریت صنعتی، واحد تهران جنوب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،تهران ،ایران
4 - گروه مدیریت صنعتی، واحد تهران جنوب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،تهران ،ایران

Received: 2020-08-27 Accepted : 2021-05-11 Published : 2021-06-22

Keywords:

References:

-        References

1. Azar, Adel.2012. Ethical considerations in modeling. Ethics in Science and Technology, seventh year, numbers six and seven.


2. Azar, Adel,Mir Mohammadi, Arash.2012. Modeling Principles: A New Approach to Modeling Complex Ethical Issues. Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, Year 7, Number One.


3. Azar et al. 2016. Research in the structural approach of soft operations, Industrial Management Organization, second edition


4. Ahmadi, Babak.2014. Modernity and critical thinking. Tehran: Markaz Publishing.


5. Iman, Mohammad Taqi.1395. Qualitative research methodology. Qom: Research Institute and University.


6. Khaki, Gholamreza.2015. Research Method with Tehran Thesis Approach: Reflections. Success Factors in National Prediction, Quarterly Journal of Future Studies, Fifth Year.


7. Khazaei S. 2016. Success Factors in National Prediction, Quarterly Journal of Future Studies, Fifth Year.


8. Ataiee, M. 2011. Multi-criteria decision making. Shahroud, Shahroud Press University.


9. Mehregan, Mohammad Reza.2009.. Operational research: Linear programming and its applications. Tehran: University Book Publishing.


10. Malekifar, Aqeel.2016. Futurism, science and art, discovering the future and shaping the good world of tomorrow. Industry and Technology Thinking Room.


11. Meshbaki, Asghar.2016., Organization and Metaphor, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, University of Tehran Press, Fourth Edition


12. Altiok, P. 2015, Applicable vision, mission and the effects of strategic management on crisis resolve, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Science,Vol. 24, pp. 61-71.


13. Ackoff, R. 2008. The social responsibility of OR. Opl Res. Q. 25,pp.361-371.


14. Bell, W. 2018. Foundations of Futures Studies: Human Science for a New Era: History, Purposes.


15. Carlsson, C. 2017. "Theory and Practice of Multiple Criteria Decision Making", North - Holland Publishing Company.


16. Ehresman, C. 2013. A theoretical frame for future studies, On the Horizon. 211, (46-53).


17. Franke, M., & John, F. 2018. What comes next after recession?–Airline industry scenarios and potential end games.Journal of Air Transport Management, 17(1).


18. Groff, L. 2015, Introduction to Future Studies. Foresight, 3(5), 106-115.


19. Godet. M 2016. Creating Futures: Scenario Planning as a Strategic Management Tool. France: Economica publish.


20. Gilles, Donald 2011. The philosophy of science in the twentieth century. Translation by Hassan Miandari, Tehran: Taha publications.


21. Georgopoulou E, Lalas D. 2018. Papagiannakis L. A multicriteria decision aid approach for energy planning problems: the case of renewable energy option. Eur J Oper Res103(1):38–54.


22. Kowalski, K. & et al. 2009. Sustainable energy futures: methodological challenges in combining scenarios and participatory multi-criteria analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 197, pp. 1063-1074.


23. Liu, S. & Lin Forrest, J.Y. 2015. Grey Systems: Theory and Applications. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.


24. Liu, S. & Lin Forrest, J.Y. & Yang Y. 2011. A Brief Introduction to Grey Systems Theory Grey Systems and Intelligent Services (GSIS). China, IEEE International Conference on Nanjing.


25. Mingers J, Rosenhead J.2015. Problem structuring methods in action. European


26. Journal of Operational Research 152(3): 530-554.


27. Mingers, J. 2016. Towards an appropriate social theory for applied systems thinking:


28. critical theory and soft systems methodology. J Appl Syst Anal 7: 41-50.


29. Mingers J.2013. A classification of the philosophical assumptions of management


30. science methods. Journal of the Operational Research Society 54(6): 559-570.


31. Mingers J.2013. Soft OR comes of age—but not everywhere!. Omega 39: 729-741.


32. Raju, K.S.; Kumar, D.N.; Duckstein, L. (2006). Artificial neural networks and multi criteria on analysis for sustainable irrigate on planning. Computers & Operations Research 24, pp. 1138-1153.


33. Rosenhead, J. 2006. Past, present and future of problem structuring methods.


34. Journal of the Operational Research Society 57, pp.759-765.


35. Roberge, I. 2012. Futures construction in public management. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(7), pp. 534-542.


36. Ramírez, R., & Wilkinson, A. (2016).Strategic Reframing: The Oxford Scenario Planning Approach. Oxford University Press.


37. Slaughter, R. 2003. Futures beyond Dystopia, Creating Social Foresight. London: Routledge, 1th edition.


38. Slavec, N. & Jovic, A. 2012. Application of Grey System Theory management Projects Ranking. ATKAFF, 53 (3): 284-293.


39. Sterman, J.D. 2017. Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for acomplex world. Boston: Irwin: McGraw-Hill.


40. San Cristóbal JR. 2019. Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable


41. energy project in spain: the Vikor method. Renew Energy 2011;36(2):498–502.


42. Westcombe, M. 2014. Problem structuring: the process of modeling. Working Paper.


43. Wallace, W.A. 2014. Ethics in modeling. Elsevier Science Ltd. Oxfoed. UK.