Constructing Hypothetical and Inferential Information in Holy Quran from Approach of a Systematic Linguistics’ Viewpoint

Subject Areas : Quarterly Sabzevaran Fadak

Bahman Gorjian ¹ , Farangis Abbas Zadeh ²

1 - Associate, Professor, Faculty of Linguistics, Islamic Azad University, Abadan Branch
2 - PhD Candidate, Faculty of Linguistics, Islamic Azad University, Abadan Branch

Received: 2021-03-25 Accepted : 2021-03-25 Published : 2021-03-21

Keywords: زبان‌شناسی نقش‌گرا, ساخت اطلاعی, مجرای ارتباطی, گفتمان نوشتاری, functional linguistic, informative structure, communicational channel, written discourse,

Abstract :

The existence of three historical, comparative and interdisciplinary features in modern linguistics accelerates its development, change and evolution. Language conveys the informational role and content structure of each word. The role of communication dependence Sentences that are identified according to their discourse role and contextual effects are essential for understanding the message. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the informational and thematic construction of several verses of the Holy Quran following the systematic theory of Halliday (1994) which has been done in a descriptive-analytical method using trustable sources (Holy Quran) to study the effect of structural and semantic coherence of Quranic verses. The results indicate that the change in the conceptual and semantic aspect of the structure depends on the information construction of the discourse and its communication elements, which is reinforced by changing the type of possible structure; and these changes take the right shape with linguistic and stylistic tools.

References:

الجرجانی، عبدالقاهر. 1984م، دلائل الإعجاز، القراءة والتعلیق: محمود محمد شاکر، القاهرة: مکتب الخانی بالقاهرة.

سجودی،‌ فرزان. 1387ش، نشانه شناسی کاربردی، چاپ اول، تهران: نشر علم.        

مهاجر، مهران و محمد نبوی. 1376ش، به سوی زبان‌شناسی شعر رهیافتی نقش‌گرا، تهران: نشر مرکز.

وندایک، تئون.ای. 1382ش، مطالعاتیدرتحلیلگفتمان؛ازدستورمتنتاگفتمان کاویانتقادی، ترجمه پیروز ایزدی و دیگران، چاپ اول، تهران: وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی، مرکز مطالعات و تحقیقات رسانه‌ها.

منابع انگلیسی

Abdul-Raof, H. (2005). Pragmalinguistic forms in cross-cultural communication: Contributions from Qur'an translation. Intercultural Communication Studies, 16 (4), 115-128.

Crystal, D. (1991). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. New York: Blackwell.

Fabb, N. (1997). Linguistics and literature. Oxford: Blakwell.

Gutwinski, W. (1976). Cohesion in literary texts. Paris: Mouton.

Halliday, M. A.K. (1989). Spoken and written language. GB: Oxford University Press.

Halliday, M. A.K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. GB: Oxford University Press.

Halliday, M. A.K.,& Hassan, R. (1985), Language, context, and text: aspect of language in a social semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Halliday, M. A.K.,& Hassan, R. (2002).On grammar. London and New York: Continuum.

Halliday, M. A.K.,& Hassan, R.(1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Hasan,  R (1984). Coherence and Cohesive Harmony. In J. Flood (ed.), Understanding reading comprehension. Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.

L. R. Horn, L. R. & Ward, G. (Eds.). (2016).  The Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 607-632). Oxford: Blackwell.

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

Prince, E.F. (1991). On functional explanation of linguistics and the origins of language, Language and Communication, 11(1/2),79-82.

Richardson, J. E. (2007). Analyzing newspapers: An approach from critical discourse analysis. New York: Palgrave Publishing.

 

مقالات و پایان نامه‌ها

ایشانی، طاهره و معصومه نعمتی قزوینی. 1392ش، «بررسیانسجاموپیوستگیدرسورهصفبارویکردزبان‌شناسینقش‌گرا»، مجله علمی- پژوهشی انجمن ایرانی زبان و ادبیات عربی، شماره 27، صص65-95.

سادات الحسینی، راضیه السادات. 1389ش، «دراسة فی جذور آراء نحاة البصرة علی ضوء المدارس اللغویة الشکلیة والوظیفیة»، جامعۀ العلامة الطباطبائی، طهران.

العوی، سلوی. 1389ش، «مطالعه زبان‌شناختی روابط متنی در قرآن»، ترجمه ابوالفضل حری، فصلنامه پژوهش‌های قرآنی، شماره 64.

فاروقی هندوالان، جلیل اله و زهرا آسوده و عبدالرحیم حقدادی. بهار 1393ش، «انتقال معنی از طریق تصویرسازی ذهنی در جزء سی ام قرآن کریم»، فصلنامه علمی نگارینه(هنر اسلامی)، ش1، صص 59- 68.

ناظمیان، رضا و حسام حاج مؤمن و محمد جمشید. 1392ش، «پیش فرض‌های بافتی و تلاش پردازش در ترجمه آیات بافت محور قرآن: دیدگاه نظریه مناسبت»، فصلنامه پژوهش‌های ترجمه در زبان و ادبیات عربی، سال سوم، شماره 6، صص49-66.

 

 

References:

Al-Jorjani, Abdul Qahir 1984 AD, Evidence of Miracles, Reading and Commentary: Mahmoud Muhammad Shakir, Cairo: Al-Khani School in Cairo.

Sujudi, Farzan. 2008, Applied Semiotics, First Edition, Tehran: Alam Publishing.

Mohajer, Mehran and Mohammad Nabavi. 1997, Towards the Linguistics of Rhetorical Approach Poetry, Tehran: Markaz Publication.

Wendike, Theon.I. 2003, Studies in Discourse Analysis; From Grammar to Critical Discourse Mining, translated by Pirooz Izadi et al., First Edition, Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance, Center for Media Studies and Research

 

English Refences:

 

Abdul-Raof, H. (2005). Pragma linguistic forms in cross-cultural communication: Contributions from Qur'an translation. Intercultural Communication Studies, 16 (4), 115-128.

Crystal, D. (1991). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. New York: Blackwell.

Fabb, N. (1997). Linguistics and literature. Oxford: Blackwell.

Gutowski, W. (1976). Cohesion in literary texts. Paris: Mouton.

Halliday, M. A.K. (1989). Spoken and written language. GB: Oxford University Press.

Halliday, M. A.K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. GB: Oxford University Press.

Halliday, M. A.K.,& Hassan, R. (1985), Language, context, and text: aspect of language in a social semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Halliday, M. A.K.,& Hassan, R. (2002).On grammar. London and New York: Continuum.

Halliday, M. A.K.,& Hassan, R.(1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Hasan,  R (1984). Coherence and Cohesive Harmony. In J. Flood (ed.), Understanding reading comprehension. Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.

L. R. Horn, L. R. & Ward, G. (Eds.). (2016).  The Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 607-632). Oxford: Blackwell.

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

Prince, E.F. (1991). On functional explanation of linguistics and the origins of language, Language and Communication, 11(1/2),79-82.

Richardson, J. E. (2007). Analyzing newspapers: An approach from critical discourse analysis. New York: Palgrave Publishing.

 

Articles and Thesis:

 

Ishani, Tahereh and Masoumeh Nemati Qazvini. 2013, "Study of coherence and continuity in Saf Surah with a map-oriented linguistic approach", Scientific-Research Journal of the Iranian Association of Arabic Language and Literature, No. 27, pp. 65-95.

Sadat Al-Husseini, Razia Al-Sadat. 1389, "Studies in the Jaws of the Opinions of the Insight on the Formation of Formal and Duty Vocabulary Schools", Tabatabai Scientific Society, Tehran.

"Linguistic study of textual relations in the Qur'an", translated by Abolfazl Hori, Quarterly Journal of Quranic Research, No. 64.

Farooqi Handwalan, Jalilullah and Zahra Asoudeh and Abdul Rahim Haghdadi. Spring 2014, "Transfer of meaning through mental imagery in the thirtieth part of the Holy Quran", Negarineh Scientific Quarterly (Islamic Art), Vol. 1, pp. 59-68.

Nazemian, Reza and Hesam Haj Mo'men and Mohammad Jamshid. 2013, "Textual Assumptions and Processing Efforts in Translating Textual Oriented Verses of the Qur'an: The Perspective of Appropriateness Theory", Quarterly Journal of Translation Studies in Arabic Language and Literature, Year 3, No. 6, pp. 49-66