Rating parametric and nonparametric methods for estimating the expected shortfall and value at risk

Subject Areas : Journal of Investment Knowledge

Mohammadreza Rostami ¹ , Alireza Saranj ² , Zoha Savari ³

1 - Assistant Professor of Finance Management, Alzahra University
2 - Assistant Professor of Finance Management, Tehran University
3 - Graduate Student of Financial Management, Alzahra University (Corresponding Author)

Received: 2016-11-02 Accepted : 2017-02-23 Published : 2017-07-23

Keywords: christofferson test, Value at risk, expectedshortfall, historical simulation and para,

Abstract :

Financial market developments make it more important to measure market risks correctly. In this paper we investigatethe forecasting accuracy of different historical simulation models in relation to the risk measure expected shortfall and in comparison to established parametric models.we used historical simulation, mirrored historical simulatin,volatility weighted historical simulation,filtered historical simulation and GARCH(1,1) models.The data that we used consists of Tehran stock exchange market index from 2010 to 2014.Christofferson backtest used for value at risk and mc neil & frey backtest used for expected shortfall. According to unconditional coverage backtesting ,mirrored historical simulation model was rejected and others were accepted and  according to independence backtesting all models were accepted thus the christoferson backtest will omit the mirrored historical simulation model and According to mc neil and frey backtest all models were accepted and finally the model confidence set procedure showed that semi parametric models are best models to forecast expected shortfall.

References:

*    رمضانی محبوبه، صادقی حجت‌الله. سنجش ریسک بازار نفت خام با استفاده از روش شبیه‌سازی تاریخی (مقایسه دو سنجه ارزش در معرض ریسک و ریزش‌موردانتظار). دومین اجلاس ملی حسابداری، مدیریت مالی و سرمایه‌گذاری 1392: 3-8.

*    حق جو سروستانی امیر، پایان‌نامه با عنوان" پیش‌بینی ارزش در معرض ریسک و ریزش‌موردانتظار شاخص بورس اوراق بهادار تهران با استفاده از مدل‌های انتگرال گیری پیوسته نوسانات شرطی".1393: 14-17.

*    سجاد رسول، گرجی مهسا، برآورد ارزش در معرض خطر با استفاده از نمونه‌گیری بوت استرپ، فصلنامه علمی-پژوهشی مطالعات اقتصادی کاربردی در ایران/سال اول، شماره 1. 4- نظیفی نائینی مینو، فتاحی شهرام، صمدی سعید. مدل‌سازی و پیش‌بینی نوسانات بازار سهام با استفاده از مدل انتقالی گارچ مارکف. فصلنامه تحقیقات مدل‌سازی اقتصادی. ۱۳۹۱; ۳ (۹): ۱۱۷-۱۴۱.

*       وب‌سایت سازمان بورس و اوراق بهادار تهران.

*       Acerbi, C. & Tasche, D. (2002). On the coherence of expected shortfall.Journal of Banking & Finance. 26 (7): 1487–1503.

*       Angelidis, T. & A, Benos. (2008). Value-at-Risk for Greek stocks.Multinational Finance Journal. 12 (1/2): 67-105.

*       Artzner, P. Delbaen, F. Eber, J.M. & Heath, D. (1999). Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical Finance. 9 (10): 203–228.

*       Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Fundamental review of the trading book: A revised market risk framework. Consultative Document, Bank for International Settlements. (2013)

*       Barone-Adesi, G. & Giannopoulos, K.Non-parametric VaR techniques, Myths and realities. Economic Notes by Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena Spa. (2001). 30: 167-181.

*       Giannopoulos, K. & Tunaru, R. Coherent risk measures under filtered historical simulation. Journal of Banking & Finance. (2005). 29: 979-996

*       Hansen. P, Lunde. A, & Nason J. The model confidence set.

*       Econometrica. (2011). 79(2): 453-497.

*       Kellner. R, Rosch."Quantifying market risk with VAR or ES? Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. (2015):55-68.

*       Noer Olsen, N. The application of historical simulationin in expected shortfall prediction. School of Business and Social Science, Aarhus university. (2015):9-39.

*       Zikovic. S, & Filer. R. (2012). Ranking of Var and ES models: Performance in developed and emerging markets.CESifo Working Paper Series No. 3980: 46-59