Comparison of Fractal Geometry and Kriging Methods to Estimate the Effect of Length Scale on Dispersivity of Reactive Elements in Soil

Subject Areas : environmental management

Yasser Hosseini ¹ , Behrouz Mehdi nejadiani ²

1 - - Associate Professor, Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Moghan, Mohaghegh Ardabili, Moghan, Iran.*(Corresponding author)
2 - -Assistant Professor, Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.

Received: 2014-09-23 Accepted : 2015-11-04 Published : 2017-06-22

Keywords: Dispersivity, Solutes Transport, Vertical Column, Theory of Fractal Geometry, geostatistics,

Abstract :

Background and Objectives: Hydrodynamic dispersion rate of solutes in soil is considered as the major parameter for pollution and solutes transport in soil, which is related to pollutant transport distance. As fractal geometry theory and geostatistical theory are capable of explaining and predicting the distance-related phenomena, this research used fractal geometry and geostatistics method for determining dispersivity. Methods: Solutes transport experiment was carried out at 16 points of soil vertical column with a diameter of 10 centimeters and a length of 1 meter and BTCs were extracted at the depth of 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 54, 48, 60, 66, 72, 78, 90, 84, 96 centimeters from the model bottom. CDE equation was then fitted with the BTCs with respect to the fractal assumptions on dispersivity coefficients. Findings: With respect to phosphorus absorption experiments in soil, phosphorus adsorption isotherm had the best fitting at 4, 12, 25, 50, 70 mg/l of phosphorus concentrations. The results showed that both methods are capable of predicting changes and increase of dispersivity coefficient in soil column after performing a mean-comparison test. However, fractal geometry method estimated values at a higher accuracy.  Discussion and Conclusion: Result showed that, dispersivity along the sample followed the exponential relation. The regression coefficients of the fractal and geostatistical models in predicting dispersivity values were 0.97 and 0.84, respectively.

References:

1. Wirenga, P.J., 2004. Solute transport in porous media. Scale Effect. Unrestricted in HTML. Vol. 28,pp.350-358

1. Pickens, J. F., and Grisak, G. E., 1981. Modeling of scale-dependent dispersion in

hydrogeologic systems. Water Resour. Res. Vol. 17(6), pp. 1701-1711.

3.  توللی. ح و سمنانی. ا، 1381، روش های تجزیه خاک ها، گیاهان ، آب ها و کودها، انتشارات دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز.


4. Oakes, D.B., Edworthy, D.J., 1977. Field measurements of dispersion coefficients in the  nited Kingdom,in Groundwater Quality, Measurment,Peridiction and Protection, Water Research Center, Reading, England, Vol. 47, pp. 327-340


5. Gime´nez, D., Rawls, W., Perfect, E., Pachepsky, Ya., 1998. Fractal models for predicting soil hydraulic properties: A review, Eng, Geol, Vol.  48, pp.161–167


6. Ayatamuno, J. M., 1998. Contaminant transport and immobilization in stratified sands, PhD-Thesis, University of Birmingham, UK.  p.234


7. Huang, G., Huang, Q., Zhan, H., 2006. Evidence of one-dimensional scale-dependent fractional advection dispersion. Journal of contaminant hydrology Vol. 85, pp.53-71.


8. Martinez, F., Pachepsky, Y.A., Rawls, W.J., 2009. Modeling Solute Transport in Soil Columns Using Advective-Dispersive Equation with Fractional spatial derivatives.Advances in Engineering Software. Vol. 41,.pp.4-8


9. Kirda, C., Nielson, D. R., Biggar, J. W., 1973. Simultaneous transport of chloride and water during infiltration, Soil Science. Vol.  37, pp.39-345


10. Al-tabbaa, A., ayotanomo, j, m., Martin, R, J., 2000. One dimentional solute transport in stratified sands at short travel distances. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol.  73, pp.1-15


11. Pachepsky, Ya., Giménez, A. D., Rawls, W, J., 2000. Bibliography on applications of fractals in soil science, Fractals in Soil Science. Vol. 27, pp. 273-295


12. Wang, H., Persaud, N., Zhou, X., 2006. Specifying Scale – dependent Dispersivity in Numerical Solutions of the Convection-Dispersion Equation.Soil Science. Vol. 7o, pp.1843-1850.


13. Darby, A., Abdel-Nasser, G., 2006. Nitrate leaching through unsaturated soil columns: comparison between numerical and analytical solutions. J. Applied Sci., Vol. 6, pp. 735-743.


14. Chou, P. Y., Wyseure, G., 2009. Hydrodynamic dispersion characteristics of lateral inflow into a river tested by a laboratory model. Hydrol. Earth Syst.Sci. Vol. 13, pp.217-228


15. Chamkha, A. J., 2007. Numerical Modeling of Contaminant Transport with. Spatially-Dependent Dispersion and Non-Linear. Chemical Reaction. Nonlinear Analysis: Modelling and control Vol. 12(3), pp. 329-343


16. .عباسی. فریبرز، 1386،  فیزیک خاک پیشرفته، انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، ص 241.


17. Mandelbrot, B.B., 1967. How long is the coastline of Great Britian? Statistical selfsimilarity and fractional dimension، Science Vol. 155,pp. 636-638.


18. شیروانی. م و شریعتمداری. ح، 1380، استفاده از همدماهای جذب در تعیین شاخص های ظرفیت بافری و نیاز استاندارد فسفر برخی خاک های آهکی استان اصفهان، پژوهش‌کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه صنعتی اصفهان.

1. Timsina, J., Connor, D.J., 2001.Productivity and management of rice-wheat cropping systems: Issues and challenges.Field crop Res، Vol. 69, pp.93-132


2. Parker, J.C., Abrecht, K.A., 1987. Sample volume effect of solute  transport predictions,Water Resource .Res, Vol. 23, pp. 2293-2310


3. Porro, I., Wierenga, P.J.,  Hills, R. G., 1993. Solute transport through large uniform and layered soil columns، Water Resour، Res، Vol. 29, pp.1321–1330.


4. Neuman, S.P، 1990. Universal scaling of hydraulic conductivities and dispersivities in geologic media، Water Resource، Res، Vol. 26,pp.1749–1758.


5. Yates, S.R ,2000. An analytical solution for one- dimensional transport in haterogeneous porous media ،Water Resouer ، Vol. 23,pp.31-2338


6. Zhou, L.H, Selim, M, 2001.Solte Transport in Layered Soils: Nonlinear and Kinetic Reactivity.Soil Science Vol. 65,pp.1056-1064


7. Rajanayaka, C , Samarasinghe S, 2002. A Comparative Study of Parameter Estimation in Hydrology Modelling: Artificial Neural Networks and Curve Fitting Approaches, Centre for Advanced Computational Solutions.