Threshold Effect of Managerial Ownership on Firm Value: Again Test by using the PSTR Model

Subject Areas : Management Accounting

Abolghasem Golkhandan ¹

1 - دانشجوی دکتری، دانشکده علوم اقتصادی و اداری، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران

Received: 2017-01-16 Accepted : 2017-04-04 Published : 2017-09-23

Keywords: Managerial Ownership, Firm Value, Threshold Level, Panel Smooth Transition Regres,

Abstract :

Previous studies show conflicting results about the effects of managerial ownership on firm value; this inconsistency in results could be due to nonlinear effects of managerial ownership on firm value. Accordingly, this paper investigates the threshold effects of managerial ownership on the value of listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange for the period of 2010 to 2015, using Panel Smooth Transition Regression (PSTR) model as one of the most prominent regime-switching models. The linearity test results indicate strongly nonlinear relationship among variables under consideration. Moreover, considering one transition function and one threshold parameter, as a two regime model, is sufficient to specification of nonlinear relationship among variables. The results indicate that threshold level is 72.58 percent and the estimated slope parameter is 2.64. In the first regime, managerial ownership has a positive effect on firm value (confirmation the hypotheses convergence of interests) that after crossing the threshold level, in the second regime, this impact is negative (hypothesis barricades). Therefore has been confirmed a relationship in the form of an inverted U between managerial ownership and firm value.

References:

*      احمدوند، م.، کامران راد، ص و کامران راد، ر. (1390). "رابطه مالکیت مدیریتی و عملکرد شرکت‌های داروسازی"، پژوهشنامه حسابداری مالی و حسابرسی، 3(10): 161-143.

*      توکل‌نیا، ا. و تیرگری، م. (1391). "اهرم مالی، سطح نگهداشت وجه نقد و ارزش شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران: بررسی روابط غیرخطی و سلسله مراتبی"، فصلنامه حسابداری مدیریت، 7(3): 51-35.

*      خدادادی، و. و تاکر، ر. (1391). "تأثیر ساختار حاکمیت شرکتی بر عملکرد مالی و ارزش شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران"، فصلنامه تحقیقات حسابداری و حسابرسی، 4(15): 101-88.

*      سهرابی، ش. و ولی‌زاده، ی. (1393). " بررسی تأثیر مالکیت مدیریتی بر عملکرد شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران"، سومین کنفرانس ملی حسابداری و مدیریت.

*      عابدی، ن. و صفری گرایلی، م. (1395). "تأثیر شفافیت اطلاعاتی بر رابطه اجتناب مالیاتی و ارزش شرکت"، فصلنامه حسابداری مدیریت، 9(31): 80-65.

*      نمازی، م. و کرمانی، الف. (1387). "تأثیر ساختار مالکیت بر عملکرد شـرکت‌هـای پذیرفتـه شـده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران"، فصلنامه بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 53: 100-83.

*      Arief, Y., Kiwanto, L., Widiyanto, A. & Agung, Y. (2014).  Linear and Non-linear Approaches in Testing Managerial Ownership on the Firm Value: Evidence Indonesian Firms", IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), 16: 1-5.

*      Demsetz, H. (1983), "The structure of ownership and the theory of the Firm", Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 375–390.

*      Fama, E.F. & Jensen, M.C. (1983). "Separation of ownership and control", Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 301-325.

*      Fok, D., van Dijk, D. & Franses, P. (2004). "A multi-level panel STAR model for US manufacturing sectors", Working Paper, University of Rotterdam.

*      Gonzalez, A., Terasvirta, T. & Van Dijk, D. (2005). "Panel smooth transition regression models", SEE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance, 604: 1-33.

*      Hansen, B. E. (1999). "Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing and inference", Journal of Econometrics, 39.

*      Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H. & Shin, Y. (2003). "Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels", Journal of Econometrics, 115: 53-74.

*      Jude, E. (2010). "Financial development and growth: A panel smooth regression approach", Journal of Economic Development, 35: 15-33.

*      Joëts, M. & Mignon, V. (2011). "On the link between forward energy prices: A nonlinear panel co-integration approach", Energy Economics, forthcoming.

*      Kadilli, A., & Markov, N. (2011). "A panel smooth transition regression model for the determinants of credibility in the ECB and the recent financial crisis", Working Papers, University of Geneva, 11092: 1-40.

*      Li, X. & Sun, S.T. (2014). "Managerial ownership and firm performance Evidence from the 2003 tax cut", Working Paper, 1-57.

*      McConnell, J. & Servaes, H. (1990). "Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value", Journal of Financial Economics, 27: 595-612.

*      Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1988). "Management ownership and market valuation", Journal of Financial Economics, 20: 293-315.

*      Na, S. K. (2002). "Ownership structure and firm performance in Korea" University of Missouri- Columbia.

*      Noradiva, N., Parastou, A. & Azlina, A. (2016). " The effects of managerial ownership on the relationship between intellectual capital performance and firm value", International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 6(7): 514-518.

*      Pushner, G. M. (1993)."Ownership structure and corporate performance in the U.S. and Japan", Working Paper, Columbia University.

*      Ruan, W., Tian, G. & Ma, S. (2011). "Managerial ownership, capital structure and firm value: Evidence from China’s civilian-run firms", Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 5(3): 73-92.

*      Shin-Ping, L. & Tsung-Hsien, C. (2009). "The Determinants of corporate performance: A viewpoint from insider ownership and institutional ownership", Managerial Auditing J, 24(3): 233-247.

*      Simoneti, M. & Gregoric, A. (2004)."  Managerial ownership and corporate performance in Slovenian post-privatizations period", The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 1(2): 217-241.

*      Terasvirta, T. (1998). "Modeling economic relationships with smooth transition regressions", in A. Ulla & D.E. Giles (eds.), Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics, Dekker, New York, 507–555