Evaluating and Prioritizing of cement plant pollutant gases based on FDH and CRA models
Subject Areas : Statisticsfatemeh dadkhah 1 , Mohammad Reza Mozaffari 2 , Javad gerami 3
1 - Department of Mathematics, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran
2 - Department of Mathematics, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
3 - Department of Mathematics, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
Keywords: تخصیص منابع مرکزی (CRA ), صنعت سیمان, تحلیل پوششی دادهها (DEA ), روش تاپسیس, مدل FDH, آنتروپی شانون,
Abstract :
Control and reduction in environmental pollutants are of a great importance in all countries. In this paper, pollutant gases in the cement industry are analyzed and then prioritized for purposes of control and filtration based on DEA models. Two new radial and non-radial DEA models are proposed to prioritize reduction in total costs and in the effects of pollutant gases. Then, another non-radial model is provided for prioritizing reduction in costs and in the effects of pollutant gases. This prioritization is carried out using free disposal hull (FDH) and central resource allocation (CRA) models considering the types of disease caused by the pollutant gases and the medical treatment costs incurred. Finally, the results of the prioritization of Fars cement industry pollutant gases by all three proposed models are compared with those given by Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method and by FDH models.
[1] Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E., 1978, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Jouenal of Operational Research 2, 429-444.
[2] Banker R.D., Charnes A., Cooper W.W., 1984, Some Model for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis, Management Science 30, 1078-1092.
[3] Deprins, D., Simar, L., Tulkens, H., 1984, Measuring labor efficiency inpost offices. In M. Marchand, P. Pestieau, H. Tulkens (Eds.), The performance of public enterprises: Concepts and measurements. Amsterdam: North Holland.
[4] Podinovski, V.V., 2004, On the linearization of reference technologies for testing returns to scale in FDH models, European Journal of Operational Research, 152, 800–802.
[5] Soleimani-damaneh M., Reshadi M., 2007, A polynomial-time algorithm to estimate returns to scale in FDH models, Computers & Operations Research 34, 2168–2176.
[6] Soleimani-damaneh M., Mostafaee A., 2015, Identification of the anchor points in FDH models, European Journal of Operational Research, 246, 936–943.
[7] García-Romero A., Santín D., Sicilia G., 2016, Another brick in the wall: a new ranking of academic journals in Economics using FDH ,Scientometrics, 107, 91–101.
[8] Golany B., Phillips F.Y., Rousseau J. J., 1993, Models for Improved Effectiveness Based on DEA Efficiency Results, IIE Transactions 25(6) 2–10.
[9] Golany B., Tamir E., 1995, Evaluating Efficiency-Effectiveness-Equality Trade-offs: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach, Management Science 41(7) 1172–1184.
[10] Lozano, S., Villa G., 2004, Centralized Resource Allocation Using Data Envelopment Analysis, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 22, 143–161.
[11] Hwang C.L., Yoon K., 1981, Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications, Spring, NewYork.
[12] Chen S., Hwang C., 1992, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
[13] Yue Z., 2011, An extended TOPSIS for determining weights of decision makers with interval numbers, Knowledge-Based Systems 24, 146–153.
[14] Behzadian M., Khanmohammadi Otaghsara S., Yazdani M., Ignatius J., 2012, A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications, Expert Systems with Applications 39, 13051–13069.
[15] Shanon C.E., 1948, A mathematical theory of communication, Bell System Technival Journal, 27, 379-423.
[16] World Health Organization, 2011, Air pollution report, An inexact optimization modeling approach for supporting energy systems planning and air pollution mitigation in Beijing city, Energy, 37, 673-688.
[17] Bevilacqua M., Braglia M., 2002, Environmental Efficiency Analysis for ENI Oil refineries, Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(1) 85-92.
[18] Kumar Mandal S., Madheswaran S., 2009, Environmental Efficiency of The Indian Cement Industry: an Interstate Analysis; The Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore, working paper 227.
[19] Benhelal E., Rafiei A., Shamsaei E., 2012, Green Cement Production: Potentials and Achievements, International Journal of Chemical Engineering and Applications, 3(6) 407-409.
[20] Oguntoke O., Awanu A.E., Annegarn H.J., 2012, Impact of cement factory operations on air quality and human health in Ewekoro Local Government Area, South-Western Nigeria, International Journal of Environmental Studies, 69(6), 934–945.
[21] Zand Hessami H., Golsefid-Alavi M., Madan Shekaf S., Kiani Mavi R., 2012, Evaluation of Success Factors of ISO 14001- Based EMS Implementation and Ranking the Cement Industry Using the TOPSIS Method, Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences, 2(10) 523-530.
[22] Wang K., Yu S., Zhang W., 2013, China’s Regional Energy and Environmental Efficiency: a DEA Window Analysis Based Dynamic Evaluation. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 58, 1117-1127.
[23] Sana S., Bhat G.A., Mehraj Balkhi H., 2013, Health Risks associated With Workers in Cement Factories, International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(5) 2250-3153.
[24] Oyinloye M.A., 2015, Environmental Pollution and Health Risks of Residents Living Near Ewekoro Cement Factory, Ewekoro, Nigeria, International Journal of Environmental, Chemical, Ecological, Geological and Geophysical Engineering, 9(2) 108-114.
[25] Lozano S., 2015, A joint-inputs Network DEA approach to production and pollution-generating technologies, Expert Systems with Applications 42, 7960–7968.
[26] Abbasi M., Kaviani M.A., 2016, Operational efficiency-based ranking framework using uncertain DEA methods, Management Decision, 54(4) 902 – 928.
[27] Liu X., Yuan Z., Xu Y., Jiang S., 2017, Greening cement in China: A cost-effective roadmap, Applied Energy 189, 233–244.