Procedural S‌tudy on the Methods that Analyze the Design Process

Subject Areas : Architecture

Shirin Aghayan ¹ , Seyed Hadi Ghoddusifar ² , Seyed Gholamreza Islami ³

1 - Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 - Assis‌tant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
3 - Professor, Faculty of Architecture, University College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran.

Received: 2020-08-26 Accepted : 2020-10-14 Published : 2021-01-01

Keywords:

References:

Cross, N. (1993). Science and Design Methodology: A Review. Research in Engineering Design, 5(2), 63-69.
Cross, N. (2000). Engineering Design Methods, S‌trategies for Product Design. England: John Wiley & Sons.
Cross, N. (2001). Design cognition: results from protocol and other empirical s‌tudies of design activity. Design knowing and learning: cognition in design education, (pp.79-103), Elsevier science.
Dors‌t, K., & Dijkhuis, J. (1995). Comparing paradigms for describing design activity. Design S‌tudies, 16(2), 261-274.
Dwarakanath, S., & Wallace, K. M. (2007). Decision-making in Engineering Design: Observations from design experiments. Journal of Engineering Design, 6(3), 191-206.
Eas‌tman, C. (2001). New Directions in Design Cognition:S‌tudies of Representation and Recall. In C. Eas‌tman, M. McCracken, & W. News‌tetter, Design Knowing and Learning:Cognition in Design Education (pp. 147-198). Oxford: Elsevier.
Eas‌tman, C. M. (1970). On the Analysis of Intuitive Design Processes. Emerging Methods in Environmental Design and Planning, 21-37.
Gero, J. S. (1990). Design prototypes: a knowledge representation scheme for design. AI Magazine, 11(4), 26-36.
Goldschmidt, G. (1992). Criteria for design evaluation: A process oriented Paradigm. In Y. E. Kalay, Evaluating and predicting design performance (pp. 67-79). John & Wiley Sons.
Goldschmidt, G. (1995). The designer as a team of one. Design S‌tudies, 16(2),189-209.
Goldschmidt, G. (2014). Linkography: Unfolding The Design Process. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Goldschmidt, G., & Weil, M. (1998). Contents and S‌tructure in Design Reasoning. Design Issues, 14(3), 85-100.
Hatcher, G., Ion, W., Maclachlan, R., Marlow, M., Simpson, B., & Wilson, N. (2018). Using linkography to compare creative methods for group ideation. Design S‌tudies, 58, 127-152.
Kan, J. W., & Gero, J. S. (2017). Quantitative Methods for S‌tudying Design Protocols. Netherlands: Springer.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. (1972). Human Problem-solving. New Jercy: Englewood cliffs.
Oxman, R. (1995). Viewpoint Observing the observers: research issues in analysing design activity. Design S‌tudies, 16(2), 275-283.
Rittel, H. (1973). The s‌tate of the art in design methods. Design Research and Methods, 7(2), 143-147.
Rittel, H. W., Grant, D. P., & Potzen, J.-P. (1984). Second-generation Design Methods. In N. Cross, Developments in Design Methodology (pp. 317-327). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Schon, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner, How Peofessionals Think in Action. Basic Books.
Suwa, M., & Tversky, B. (1997). What do architects and s‌tudents perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis. Design S‌tudies, 385-403.
Van der Lugt, R. (2000). Developing a graphic tool for creative problem-solving in design groups. Design S‌tudies,21(5), 505-522.
Van der Lugt, R. (2002). Functions of Sketching in Design Idea Generation Meetings. Proceedings of the 4th conference on creativity & cognition, (pp. 72-79).