Identifying Effective Indicators for Typology of Urban Fabrics

Subject Areas : architecture

Kianoosh  Zakerhaghighi ¹ (Department of Art and Architecture Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University.)
Hamid  Majedi ² (Assistant Professor, Department of Art and Architecture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University.)
Farah  Habib ³ (Associate Professor, Department of Art and Architecture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University.)

Received: 2009-09-05 Accepted : 2009-11-24 Published : 2010-12-22

Keywords:

Abstract :

An unexampled rate of transformation in urban fabric of Iranian metropolises causes many unprecedented physical changes on it. Because of these physical changes, the city's morphology has changed dramatically and in so many cases, because of unplanned / anti - planned changes, urban fabric's morphology does not follow regularity and continuity. This trend cause that planning for these kind of urban fabric confronts with difficulty because of great diversity of form in these urban fabric. This research is an attempt to determine effective indicators for classifying urban fabric types in order to plan them. The research used documentary method in compiling theoretical framework for typological and morphological studies, so tries to find some regulative principles for classification. This documentary research showed that there are two paradoxical paradigms: first, researchers need some kind of classification which  contain maximum information and attributes on itself and this will lead to increase in number of types; and second, for making an reasonable classification and manageable set which facilitate planning on it, researchers need minimum types. These two paradoxical paradigms always manifest in complicated fields of classification which have great diversity in itself. Also research finds that there are three approaches in urban morphology: first, environment and behavior with concentration on relations between human behavior and built environment; second, place and its image with concentration on relationships between human experience and built environment; and third, structure and procedure with concentration on built environment evolution with help of analyzing typological elements in urban morphology. Because of its relevance, the research chose third approach. Then by using analytical - comparative method and reviewing some documents and researches, three criteria for defining typologies were determined. These criteria include form and layout, height, streets network. In accordance with two paradigms, research had to choose and analytical unit in urban fabric. Literature review showed that there are three analytical level in urban fabric research: parcels, blocks and neighborhoods. According to the goals of this research, block level was selected. Then from these three criteria, nine indicators were manifested. These indicators include average area of parcels in block, average frontage of parcels in block, average ratio of width to length of parcels, area of block, maximum slope of block, floor area ratio, ground space index, open space ratio, average number of floors in block, average visible surface, average ratio of street width to buildings height, and half of area of adjacent streets to a block as block permeability index. Paradigms of research showed that it is not possible to use all nine indicators together for classifying urban fabric, but it can be classified to main types by using essential indicators and in two stage processes. First, by using more important indicators according to purposes of planning which would be included average area of parcels in block, ground space index, floor area ratio and open space ratio. Then these main types can be subdivided by using remaining indicators to identify sub-types, and this would be a systematic approach for classifying urban fabric.  

References:

1 .ارجمندنیا، اصغر (1375 ،(الگوی تفکیک زمین والگوی مصرف مسکن، در
مجموعه مقالات سومین سمینار سیاسـتهـای توسـعه مـسکن در ایـران، وزارت
مسکن و شهرسازی، جلداول صص 59-81.
2 .حـائری، محمدرضـا (1372 ،(طرحـی ازکالبـد شـهر ایرانـی، بررسـی
گونهشناسانه بافت شهری درقرن چهارده شمسی، در خلاصهمقالات
سمینار تداوم حیات در بافت قدیمی شهرهای ایران، محمد مرادی، اصغر، دانـشگاه
علم و صنعتایران.
3 .حبیب، فـرح (1384 ،(جزوهدرسشکلشناسی شـهری، دورهی دکتـرای
تخصـصی شهرسـازی، واحـدعلـومو تحقیقـات دانـشگاه آزاد اسـلامی، تهـران
(منتشرنشده

4 .سعیدنیا، احمد(1378 ،(شکل شهر، مجلهمعماری و فرهنگ، شماره 1.
5 .شفایی، سپیده، مهندسین مشاور شاران، (1385،(راهنمای شناسایی ومداخله
دربافتهای فرسوده، ایدهپردازان فن وهنر.
6 .عزیزی، محمدمهدی (1382 ،(تراکم در شهرسازی، اصول و معیارهای تعیین
تراکم شهری، انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
7 .میرمقتدایی، مهتا و ژاله طالبی (1385 ،(هویت کالبدی شهر (مطالعه موردی
تهران)، مرکز تحقیقات ساختمان و مسکن، چاپ اول.
8. Acioly C. and F. Davidson (1996), Density in Urban
Development, Building Issues, Vol. 8, No.3, Lund Centre
for Habitat Studies, Lund University.
9. Barquin C., Brook R., Puri R., and Rybczynski W., (1986),
How the Other Half Builds, Volume 2: Plots, Research
Paper No. 10, Centre for Minimum Cost Housing, School of
Architecture, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
10. Haupt, per and Meta Berghauser Pont (2002), Spacemate:
the Spatial Logic of Urban Density, Delft University Press,
The Netherlands.
11. Haupt, per and Meta Berghauser Pont (2005), the
Spacemate: Density and Typomorphology of the Urban
Fabric, in Nordisk Arkitektur Forskning, vol. 4.
12. Jelinek G., (1992), Aspects of Density in Urban and
Residential Planning for Jabotabek, in Trialog, Vol. 32,
pp. 8-14, Berlin.
13. Krier, Rob (1990), Typological Elements of the Concept of
Urban Space, in Papadakis, a. and H. Watson (eds.), New
Classicism, Omnibus Edition, Academy Editions, London,
pp 212-19.
14. Kropf, Karl (1996), Urban Tissue and the Character of
Towns, Urban Design International, Vol.1, No.3.
15. Larkham, Peter J (1998), Urban Morphology and
Typology in the United Kingdom, in Typological Process
and Design Theory, Agha Khan Program for Islamic
Architecture.
16. Moudon Arne V., (1994), Getting to Know the Built
Landscape: Typomorphology, in Frank K. and
Schneekloth L. (eds.), Ordering Space, Types in Architecture
and Design, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
17. Moudon Arne V., (1997), Urban Morphology as an
Emerging Interdisciplinary Field, in Urban Morphology
Journal, No.1, pp. 3-10, Heron Press, Birmingham.
18. Owens, Peter M. (2005), Beyond Density: Measuring
Neighborhood Form in New England's Upper
Connecticut River Valley (PhD dissertation), University of
California, Berkley.
19. Rapoport Amos, (1990), Vernacular Architecture, in Turan
M., (eds.); Current Challenges in the Environmental Social
Sciences, Avebury, Aldershot, England.
20. Rådberg J., (1996), Towards a Theory of Sustainability
and Urban Quality: A New Method for Typological
Urban Classification, in Gray M., (ed.), Evolving
Environmental Ideals: Changing Ways of Life, Values and
Design Practice, Book of Proceedings for the 14th
Conference of the International Association for PeopleEnvironment Studies, Stockholm, pp.384-392.
21. Yoshida, Hiroyuki and Manaba Omae (march 2005), An
Approach for Analysis of Urban Morphology: Methods
to Derive Morphological Properties of City Blocks by
Using an Urban Landscape Model and Their
Interpretations; Computers, Environment and Urban
Systems Journal, Vol.19, Issue 2, page 223-247.