The role and position of territorialization and border guarding of cyber space in exercising sovereignty over national cyberspace
Subject Areas : Legal Studies of Cyberspace
mehrab ramak
1
(Ph.D. in strategic management of cyberspace)
ehsan kiankhah
2
(Ph.D. in strategic management of cyber space)
Seyed Hosein Alavi
3
(Student of Strategic Management of Cyberspace of National Defense University)
Keywords: Principles and rules of international law, national sovereignty, territorialization of cyber space, border guarding of cyber space,
Abstract :
With the increasing use of cyber technologies and equipment in people's personal and social lives, we are witnessing countries paying more attention to the phenomenon of national cyber territory with the aim of exercising sovereignty and preventing aliens from dominating the national cyber space. This research investigates the role and position of territorialization and border guarding of cyberspace in the exercise of sovereignty over national cyberspace by examining the literature related to sovereignty over territorial territory and how the principles and rules of international law related to national sovereignty are adapted to national cyberspace. According to the purpose, the current research is of developmental-applied type and the research method used in this research is descriptive-analytical, which has been used to collect information from library and internet sources, and it has been tried to get the necessary basics to explain the topic from up-to-date sources. be extracted internally and externally. After analyzing the information, the researchers concluded that territorialization and border guarding of the cyber space can play a significant role in exercising sovereignty over the national cyber space, and having the principles and rules of international law, legal pursuits and defense of the national cyber space requires the definition and declaration of the national cyber space. And it is an effective border guard of this space. In addition, the non-definition of the national territory and border in the cyberspace will not lead to the lawful behavior of private and government actors in a legal space.
منابع
1. بدیعی ازنداهی، مرجان و میراحمدی، فاطمه سادات و غلامی، بهادر،1399،مقایسۀ مفهوم «حاکمیت ملی» در قوانین اساسی مشروطه و جمهوری اسلامی ایران
2. کریمی قهرودی، محمدرضا و زارعی وحید (1399)، حاکمیت فضای سایبری، انتشارات موسسه آموزشی و تحقیقاتی صنایع دفاعی.
3. کامران دستجردی حسن. (۱۴۰۱). کاربرد حاکمیت درمقیاس های فضایی. نشریه تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی، سال بیست و دوم، شماره 65.
4. کاویانی راد، مراد. (1392). پردازش مفهوم «قلمرو» از دیدگاه جغرافیای سیاسی. برنامه ریزی و آمایش فضا (مدرس علوم انسانی)، 17(4)، 43-61.
5. اسمعیل‌زاده ملاباشی, پرستو, & عبدالهی. (1399). حملات سایبری و نقض اصل عدم مداخله. فصلنامه مطالعات حقوق عمومی دانشگاه تهران, 50(2), 711-736.
6. Paasi, A., Ferdoush, M. A., Jones, R., Murphy, A. B., Agnew, J., Ochoa Espejo, P., & Fall, J. J. (2022). Locating the territoriality of territory in border studies. Political Geography, 95, 102584.
7. Douzet, F. (2020). Cyberspace: the new frontier of state power. Handbook on the Changing Geographies of the State.
8. Medeiros, B. P., & Goldoni, L. R. F. (2020). The Fundamental Conceptual Trinity of Cyberspace. Contexto Internacional, 42, 31-54.
9. Tsaugourias, N. (2017). Law, Borders and the Territorialisation of Cyberspace. Indonesian J. Int'l L., 15, 523.
10. Osborn, P. (2017). Cyber Border Security–Defining and Defending a National Cyber Border. Homeland Security Affairs, 13.
11. BARLOW'S, J. P. (1996). Declaration ofindependence for cyberspace.
12. Johnson, D. R., & Post, D. (1996). Law and borders: The rise of law in cyberspace. stanford law review, 1367-1402.
13. Goldsmith, J. L. (1998). Against cyberanarchy. The University of Chicago Law Review, 65(4), 1199-1250.
14. Lambach, D. (2020). The territorialization of cyberspace. International Studies Review, 22(3), 482-506.
15. Möllers, N. (2021). Making digital territory: Cybersecurity, techno-nationalism, and the moral boundaries of the state. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 46(1), 112-138.
16. Broeders, D., & van den Berg, B. (Eds.). (2020). Governing Cyberspace: Behavior, Power and Diplomacy. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
17. Janparvar, M., Ghasri, M., & Hosseinpour Motlagh, M. (2015). Border Management of Cyberspace, First Step of Cyber Defense. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 5.
18. Heintschel von Heinegg, W. (2013). Territorial sovereignty and neutrality in cyberspace. International Law Studies, 89(1), 17.
19. Dziwisz, D. (2022). Non-War Activities in Cyberspace as a Factor Driving the Process of De-Bordering. Politics and Governance, 10(2).
20. Assaf, A., & Moshnikov, D. (2020). Contesting sovereignty in cyberspace. International Cybersecurity Law Review, 1(1), 115-124.
21. Goel, S. (2020). National cyber security strategy and the emergence of strong digital borders. Connections, 19(1), 73-86.
22. Deibert, R. J., & Pauly, L. W. (2019). Mutual entanglement and complex sovereignty in cyberspace. In Data Politics (pp. 81-99). Routledge.
23. Stadnik, I. (2021). Russia: An independent and sovereign Internet?. Power and Authority in Internet Governance, 147-167.
DOI:10.1365/s43439-020-00004-5
24. Stewart, D. P. (2018). Recent Developments in US Cyberlaw. Agenda Internacional, 25(36), 113-131
