Mechanism and dynamism of family values ​​in Ilam (a mixed study)

Subject Areas : Quarterly Journal of Woman and Society

zahra abdolahi ¹ (Officer)
Yarmohammad Ghasemiy ² (Department factually unevsity)
Nair Pirahari ³ (Department factually unevsity)
khalil mirzaei ⁴ (Depart ment faculty member f azad university)

Received: 2021-07-08 Accepted : 2022-01-25 Published : 2022-04-21

Keywords: Modernity, Family values, change, traditions, hybrid approach,

Abstract :

Over the past few decades, the innstitutionof the family, influenced by the process of modernity, has undergone profound changes at both the objective level – structural and subjective. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to study the mechanism and dynamism of family values ​​in Ilam. The method used is a sequential combination research method. The study population of this study were couples of two decades (1365-1375 and 1385-1695) living in Ilam that based on purposive sampling method (qualitative part) and random (quantitative part) the required information was collected. In the exploratory (qualitative) part of the research, 110 concepts, 23 component categories and 27 major categories were extracted, and the nuclear category, which is a theory discovery, was introduced as a modern and fragile family. The results show that the evolution of family values ​​between the two generations is evident in the areas of spouse selection, lifestyle, family traditions, and children. As a result of the family; It is moving towards a modern and fragile family.
The findings of the quantitative section, while confirming the results of the qualitative section, indicate that family values ​​in recent decades in Ilam have been influenced by the process of modernity and its consequences and during the process of transformation of values ​​with the focus on fading traditions.

References:

1- Inglehart‚ R. (2007). Modernization‚ Social Change and Continuation of Traditional Values‚ translated by Hamed Haji Heidari‚ Yas Strategy Journal.

2- Moeidfar‚ S.(2012).Sociology of Social Issues in Iran‚ Tehran: Noor Alam Publishing. https://s21.picofile.com/file/ 8447067318/9011396H0688_r3.pdf.html

3- Toffler‚ A.(2006). Shock Ayandeh‚ translated by Heshmatollah Kamrani‚ Simorgh Publishing‚ third edition.

4- Azad Armaki‚ T.‚ Khademi‚ H. (2003). Value Preferences of Tehran Students‚ Cultural Research Letter‚ Year 8‚ Vol.

5- Bourdieu‚ P.(2001). Theory of action: practical reasons and rational choice‚ Translated by Morteza Mardiha‚ Tehran: Naghsh and negar.

6- Craib‚ Y.(2009). Modern Social Theory from Parsons to Habermas‚ translated by Abbas Mokhber‚ Agah Publishing‚ First Edition.

7- Ahmadzadeh Kermani‚ R. ‚ Ghasemi‚ T.(2013). Investigating the role of the Internet on family values‚ Quarterly Journal of media Studies‚ Year 8‚ No. 23.

8- Mohammadpour‚A.(2007). Semantic Reconstrruction of Development and Social Change‚ PhD Thesis in Development Sociology‚ Shiraz University.

9- Jayakody‚ R‚ A. Thornton‚ and W. Axinn(2007) International Family Change: Ideational Perspectives. New York: Taylor & Francis Group‚ LLC.

10- Zahedi‚ M.‚ Khezrnejad‚ A. (2013). Modernization and the process of changing values in the field of family‚ Iranian Journal of Sociology‚ Volume 14‚ Number 1.

11- Inglehart, Ronald (2000) Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural,Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

12- Borhosseinbeigi‚ M.(2004).Investigating the relationship between the internet and the value between the two generation‚ Master Thesis in Sociology‚ Faculty of Social Sciences‚ Tehran.

13- Tavakoli‚ M.(2009). Values‚ concepts and research tools Nos15 and 14.

14- Mohammadpour‚ A. (2013). Qualitative research method: Logicand design in qualitative methodology‚ Volume 1‚ Tehran.

15- Creswell‚ J. W. (2003) Research Design: Qualitative‚ Quantitative‚ and Mixed Methods Approaches‚ Second Edition‚ Thousand Oaks‚ CA: Sage Publications.

16- Strauss and Corbin(1998) Basic of Qualitative Research‚ London: Sage Publication

17- Smith‚ Tom W.(2004). The generation gap revisited. Network on transitions to adulthood and policy brief‚ issue 5.

18- Neuman‚ lobert(2006) Social Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches‚ Thierd Edition. London: Alln and Bacon.

19- Vitali‚ Agnese & et al. (2008)“Preference Theory and Low Fertility: A Comparative Perspective″ Euopean Demographic Research papers.

20- Giddens‚ A.(2013). Modernity and personalization: Society and Personal Identity in the New Age‚ translated by Nasser Mofaghian‚ Tehran: Ney publishing.

21- Kafashi‚ M.(2009). Investigating the Impact of the Internet on Family Values‚ Social Research Quarterly‚ Second year‚ No.3

22- Donoghoe‚ M. C. et al (2003). Life-style Factors and Social Circumstances of Syring Sharing in Injecting Drug Users‚ British Journal of Addiction.

23- Veblen‚ T.(2010). Economic theory of women clothing‚ translated by Mohammad Reza Taheri‚ bi-monthly Surah Andisheh‚ vol.14.

24- saraei‚ H. (2007). Continuity and change of family in the context of demographic transition‚ Letter of the Iranian Demographic Association‚ No.2.

25- Ghaffari‚ GH.(2016). National Survey of Values and Attitudes Third Wave‚ Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance‚ Fall.

26- Lahasaeizadeh‚ A. ‚Abdollahi‚ A.(2002). Sociology of the Third World. Shiraz:Navid.

27- Mcquail‚ D.(2003). An Introduction to the Theory of Mass Communication‚ translated by Parviz Ejlali‚ Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance‚ Center for Media Studies and Research.

28- Safiri‚ Kh. (2009). Qualitative research method‚ Tehran: Pouya Payam Publishing‚ second edition.

29- Abdi‚ A.(2014). Introduction to Research in Family Sociology in Iran‚ Tehran: Ney.

30- Rafipour‚ F.(2000). Development and Contradiction‚ Tehran: Shahid Beheshti Publishing Center.

31- Sadeghi‚ R.‚ Rezaei‚ M. ‚ Partovi‚ L. (2011). Tradition‚ Modernization‚ and the Family: A Study of Family Continuity and change in Tribal Communities‚ Women Research Quarterly‚ Volume 7‚ Issue 4.

32- Sheikhi‚ M.(2001). Sociology of Women and Family‚ Tehran: Anteshar Co.

33- Inglehart, R. (2000) Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural,Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.