Sociological analysis of individualism among women and men and its related factors (Case study: People over 30 years old in Shiraz)

Subject Areas : Quarterly Journal of Woman and Society

mehdi masihi ¹ (student)
علی رضا کلدی ² (عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه علوم و تحقیقات تهران)
سید محمد صادق مهدوی ³ (عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه علوم و تحقیقات تهران)

Received: 2017-01-25 Accepted : 2020-08-31 Published : 2020-10-22

Keywords: Individualism, Gender, Comparison, Modernity,

Abstract :

Individualism, as one of the concepts of the modern era, has attracted the attention of many scholars due to the many consequences of today's society. The present study is aimed at comparing the status of individualism and its related factors among women and men. Simmel's Individualism Theory is considered as the theoretical framework of the research. The statistical population includes all 30-year-olds above the city of Shiraz, including women and men. Using the Cochran formula, 385 people were assigned a sample size of 5% error rate. The sampling method in this research is a multi-stage class. The data gathering tool was a questionnaire. The results showed that the individuality level of 61.5% of respondents was moderate. Also, 22.4% had low individualism and 16.1% had high individualism. The results of inferential statistics showed that only two variables with individuality did not have a significant statistical relationship. These two variables are marital status and income. Other variables such as age, religious beliefs, gender, educational level, socioeconomic status and the extent of using mass media with individuality were statistically significant. As a result, assumptions about the status of divorce and income have been rejected and other research hypotheses have been approved. The results show that with a confidence level of 99%, the level of individualism varies between men and women.

References:

-Aghabakshi, A. Ahmadirad,M.(2004). Culture of Political Science. Tehran, Chapar Publishing.

-Ahmadi, B. (1994). Modernity and Critical Thoughts. Tehran, Center Publishing.

-Ahmadi, F. (2004). Individuality is the foundation stone of the Bicompsy. Social Science Moon. The third period Seventh year, N 8.

-Afshani, A. Khorrampour, Y & Jahararchian, N. (2014). Investigating the Relationship between Globalization and Individualism among Yazd Youth. Social Science Journal of Shoushtar Azad University. Eighth year, No 26:3.

-Arastekho, M. (2002). Culture of scientific-social terms. Tehran, Chap pakhsh Publishing. First Edition.

-Arbelaster, A.  (1998). Western liberalism emerges and falls. Tehran, Markaz Publishing. Third Edition.

-Azadeh, A. & Tavakoli, A. (2007). Individualism and collectivism and religiosity. Quarterly Iranian Cultural and Communication Studies Association. No. 3 (9): 101.

-Behrovan, H. & Alizadeh, A. (2007). Studying individuality and its effective factors among students. Medical Journal of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. 26-1.

-Cooser, L. (2004). The Life and Thought of the Elders of Sociology. Mohsen, S. Tehran, Scientific Publishing.

-          Daniel, Storms. (2004). possessive individualism and the dimestic liberal roots of international theory. University of Manitoba. Winnipeg. Manitoba.june2-6.

-Goodarzi, M. (2016). Perspective of Iran. No. 96, March 2002 and April 2006, pp. 84-86.

-Jahanian, N. (1999), Individualism and the Liberal-Capitalist System. Book Publishing. No.3: 29

-Khajeh Noori, B. Parnian, L. & Jafari, M. (2013). Study of the relationship between cultural globalization and individualism and youthfulness. Applied Sociology. Year 24. No 52:4.

-Kwang-Il, Yoon. (2010). Political culture of individualism and collectivism. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy (political science) in the university of Michigan.

-Mohseni Tabrizi, A. & Sedaghat Fard, M. (2011). A Survey on Social Indifference in Iran. Journal of Applied Sociology, No. 3.

-Mojdefar, Saeed and Sabori Khosroshahi, Habib (2010). Individuality of children in the family. Social Sciences Research. forth year. No.4: 110 -94.

-Nikoo Goftar, M. (2014). An Interdisciplinary Approach to Social Health Study of the Role of Collegiate Individualism, Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, Volume 6, Issue 2.

-Rezaei, A. Inaloo, Mina. & Fakri, Mohammad. (2010). Management of the body and its relation with social factors. Journal of Strategic Women Studies. Year 12. 47-141.

-Riesman, David. (1956).”The Lonely Crowd. study of the changing American character”,with Nathan Glazer and Reuel Denney. Double day & Company INC. Gardencity. New York.

-Roskach, J. & Warren, R. (1976). Introduction to Sociology. Behrouz, N. & Ahmad, K. Tehran, Farvardin Library.

ـSchaffer, B. (2005). The Foundations of Youth Sociology. Karamatullah, R. Tehran, Iran.