Performance Evaluation and Sensitivity Analysis of Various Models of SIRMOD Software in Furrow Irrigation Design

Subject Areas : Subjects

M. مرادزاده ¹ (دانشجوی دکتری آبیاری و زهکشی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز)
S. برومندنسب ² (استاد گروه آبیاری و زهکشی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز)
R. لاله زاری ³ (دانشجوی دکتری آبیاری و زهکشی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز)
M. بهرامی ⁴ (دکتری آبیاری و زهکشی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز)

Received: 2014-03-01 Accepted : 2014-03-01 Published : 2013-11-22

Keywords: SIRMOD, furrow irrigation, advance phase, recession phase, Sensitivity analysis,

Abstract :

As furrow irrigation is practiced on a large percentage of farm fields in Iran, the design and operation of this system calls for improvement. As collecting the necessary data to predict of advance and recession curves in a furrow requires field accurate measurements. These operations are costly and time consuming and the use of approved models is advantageous. The main objective of this study was evaluating the hydrodynamic, zero inertia, and kinematic wave models prediction by field observation using the SIRMOD software. Sensitivity analysis for this software was performed by employing three input parameters: discharge, Manning's roughness coefficient and furrow slope. Field experiment performed at the Research Farm of Faculty of Water Sciences Engineering, the Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. Data were collected from three furrows, 60, 80 and 90 meters long, with three replications and three discharges of 1.0, 1.25 and 1.5 liters.sec^-1. Four indices: 45 degree line (a), model average prediction error (E_r), regression coefficient (R²) and average relative error of model (E_a) were used to evaluate the model’s predictions. The results of sensitivity analysis indicated that the SIRMOD software was sensitive to variations of input parameters. The predicted values of advance phase for all models were more than the observed values, but, generally, the amounts of (a) and R² indicated that the hydrodynamic and zero inertia models had better performance in prediction of advance phase compared with the kinematic wave model. Moreover, the hydrodynamic and zero inertia models, as in the advance phase, predicted the regression phase better compared with the kinematic wave model.

References:

4. Abbasi, F., M. Mahmodian Shooshtari, and
J. Feyen. 2003. Evaluation of various
surface irrigation numerical simulation
models. J Irrig. Drain. Eng. ASCE.
129:208–213.
5. Bassett, D. L. 1972. A mathematical model
of water advance in border irrigation.
Trans ASCE. 15: 992-995.
6. Bautista, E., and W.W. Wallender. 1992.
Hydrodynamic furrow irrigation model
with specified steps. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng.
ASCE. 118: 450-465.
7. Elliott, R.L., W.R. Walker, and G.V.
Skogerboe. 1982. Zero inertia modeling
of furrow irrigation advance. J. Irrig.
Drain. Eng. ASCE. 108: 179-195.
8. Esfandiari, M. 1997. Evaluation of Furrow
irrigation models for southeast Australia.
Ph.D. thesis, University of Western
Sydney, Richmond, Australia, 359p.
(Unpublished).
9. Key, M. 1990. Recent developments for
improving water management in surface
irrigation and overhead irrigation. Agri.
Water Manage. 17: 7-23.
10. Kincaid, D.C. 1970. Hydrodynamic of
border irrigation. PhD Dissertation,
Department of Agricultural Engineering,
Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins,
Colorado.
11. Kruger, W.E, and D.L. Bassett. 1965.
Unsteady flow of water over a porous
bed constant infiltration. Trans. ASCE. 8:
60-61.
12. Maheshwari, B.L., T.A. McMahon, and
A.K. Turner. 1990. Sensitivity analysis
of the parameters of border irrigation
models. Agri. Water Manage. 18: 227-
287.
13. McCuen, R.H. 1973. The role of
sensitivity analysis in hydrologic
modeling. J. Hydrol. 18:37-53.
14. Merriam, J.L. 1977. Efficient Irrigation.
California Polytechnic and State Univ.,
San Luis Obispo, Calif.
15. Reyej, M.W., and W.W.
Wallender. 1985. Furrow irrigation
simulation time reduction. J. Irrig. Drain.
Eng. 11: 134-146.
16. S
chwankl, L.J., and W.W. Wallender.
1988. Zero inertia furrow modeling with
variable infiltration and hydraulic
characteristics. Trans. Am. Soci. of Agri.
Eng. 31:1470-1475.
17. Shayya, W.H., V.F. Barlts, and L.J.
Segerlind. 1993. Kinematic-wave furrow
irrigation analysis: a finite element
approach. Trans. ASCE. 36:1733-1742.
18. Strelkoff, T. 1972. Prediction of
increases in surface-irrigation
efficiencies. Proc. Nati. Water Resour
Meeting, ASCE, New York.
19. Strelkoff, T. 1994. SRFR, A model of
surface irrigation .U.S. Water Conserv.
Lab. Phoenix, AZ.
20. Walker, W.R., and F. Gichuki. 1985.
Documentation of surface irrigation
models. Report Utah State Univ., Logan,
Utah, USA.
21. Walker, W.R, and A.S. Humpherys.
1983. Kinematic-wave furrow irrigation
model. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. ASCE. 109
:
377
-392
.
22
. Walker, W.R., 1989. SIRMOD, A model
of surface irrigation. Utah State Univ.,
Logan, Utah, USA.

_||_