Assessment of Variations of Three Infiltration Models for Furrow Irrigation

Subject Areas : Article frome a thesis

محمدرضا Emdad ¹

1 - استادیار و عضو هیات علمی موسسه تحقیقات خاک و آب

Received: 2013-09-16 Accepted : 2013-09-16 Published : 2013-08-23

Keywords: Infiltration, Volume balance, furrows irrigation, Kostiakov-Lewis, Philip and SCS,

Abstract :

Soil infiltration rate is the most important factor in designing irrigation systems. Therefore, selection of a suitable infiltration equation is a prerequisite for achieving the best performance of any irrigation system. As a plant’s performance integrates numerous factors, particularly water demand in arid environments, providing adequate and timely water in irrigated fields passes a challenge. In this regard, the coefficients of three popular infiltration equations, namely: Kostiakov-Lewis, Philip and SCS, were investigated along the volume balance equation. The cumulative infiltration depths in furrows planted with sweat corn were also compared using different equations. Three periods: first, mid and end of maize growth season were considered in this study. Results indicated that the application of Philip equation (one point method) was not applicable because it over-predicted the infiltration depths. Moreover, the mean absolute error (AAE) of the Philip equation (0.00683) and SCS equation (0.00373) were larger than that of the Kostiakov-Lewis equation (0.00253). Finally, the results revealed that the Kostiakov-Lewis equation were the best predictor of the three infiltration equations used in this study.

References:

3. Camacho, E. and C. Perez. 1997. Model
for management and control of furrow
irrigation in real time. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng.
123: 264-269.
4. Elliott, R. and W. Walker. 1982. Field
evaluation of furrow infiltration and
advance functions. ASAE. 25: 396-400.
5. Elliott, R. and W. Walker. 1983.
Infiltration parameters from furrow
irrigation advance data. Trans. of ASAE
26: 1726-1731.
6. Esfandiari, M. and B Maheshwari. 1997.
Field values for estimating surface storage
on clay soil. Irrig. Sci. 17: 159-161.
7. Fattah, H. and. S. Upadhyaya. 1996. Effect
of soil crust and soil compaction on
infiltration in yolo loam soil. Trans.
ASAE. 39: 79-84.
8. Gillies, M, R. Smith. And R. Raine. 2007.
Infiltration parameters from surface
irrigation advance and run-off data. Irrig.
Sci. 24: 25-35.
9. Guardo, M. and R. Oad. 2000. Comparison
of Zero-inertia and volume balance
advance – infiltration models. J. Hydraul.
Eng. 126: 457-465.
10. Hartley, D.M. 1992. Interpretation of
Kostiakov infiltration parameters for
borders. ASCE 118:156-165.
11. Khatri, L. and R. Smith. 2006. Real- time
prediction of soil infiltration characteristics
for the management of furrow irrigation.
Irrig. Sci. 25: 33-43.
12. 12- Maheshwari, B. 1997. Interrelations
among physical and hydraulic parameters
of non-cracking soils. J. Agric.
Eng. Res. 68: 297-309.
13. Maheshwari, B. And N. Jayawardane.
1992. Infiltration characteristics of some
clayey soils measured during border
irrigation. Agric. Water Manage. 21: 265-
279.
14. Martinez, J. 1999. Irrigation with Saline
water: benefits and environmental impact.
Agric. Water Manage. 40: 183-194.
15. Raine, R. 1999. Research, development
and extension in irrigation. National Centre
16. Raine, R. and J. Mcclymont. 1997. The
development of guidelines for surface
irrigation in areas with variable infiltration.
Proceeding of Australian Society of Sugar
Cane Technologists: 293-301.
17. Shepard, J. and W. Wallender. 1993. One
point method for estimating furrow
infiltration. Trans. ASAE 36: 395-404.
18. Valiantzas, J. 2001. Optimal furrow
design. ASCE 127: 201-208.
19. Valiantzas, J. and S. Aggelides. 2001.
Furrow infiltration estimation from time to
a single advance point. Agric. Water
Manage. 52: 17-32. 

_||_