Analysis of Hydrogen-Induced Cracking and Lamination in a Pipeline Steel Based on Fitness-For-Service Assessment

Subject Areas : journal of New Materials

Farzad Pahnaneh ¹ (Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, IranTehran, Iran)
Shahabedin Zangeneh ² (Department of Materials and Textile Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.)
FARID NAEIMI ³ (Advanced Materials Research Center, Materials Engineering Department, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran.)

Received: 2022-08-23 Accepted : 2023-02-02 Published : 2022-08-23

Keywords: Hydrogen-induced cracking (HIC), Failure assessment diagram(FAD), Lamination, Fitness-for-Service (FFS)assessment,

Abstract :

Abstract Introduction: Fitness-for-service (FFS) assessment is one of the standard methods used in oil and gas structures. This method is for assessment the defects of pipes and equipments, which can be operated without repair or replacement if the existing defects are within the accepted range of this standard. Methods: During inspection of an 7-km-long pipeline made of API X52 steel carrying hydrocarbons containing wet H2S, hydrogen-induced cracking (HIC) and Lamination was found at different locations along the pipeline length. Microstructural investigations by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed stepwise cracking (SWC) as the result of the presence of MnS inclusions. Fitness-for-service (FFS) assessment based on API579-1/ASME FFS-1 was performed to decide on the pipeline serviceability. Findings: The finite element analysis (FEA) results showed that the HIC-damaged pipeline was acceptable per level-3 FFS requirements and the pipeline understudy was fit for service. The remaining life of the damaged pipeline should also be periodically monitored using failure assessment diagram (FAD).

References:

1.                  Lynch, S.P.  2013. Mechanisms and kinetics of environmentally assisted cracking. current status, issues, and suggestions for further work. Metall. Mater. Trans. A. 44(3), 1209–1229.     

2.                  Zangeneh, Sh. 2021. Fitness-for-service assessment of local thin area in a line pipe,  J Failure Anal Preven, 3, 1085–1095.

3.                  Soliman, A.A. et al. 2018. Pressure carrying capacities of thin walled pipes suffering from random colonies of pitting corrosion. Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 166, 48–60.

4.                  Shah, U. Prasad, P. 2019. Fitness for service assessment of carbon steel vessel with localized deformation during PWHT,  in ASME 2019 pressure vessels & piping conference.

5.                  Jacquemin, T. et al. 2018. Contribution of finite element analyses to crack-like flaw assessments in a gas pipeline, Int. J. Press, Vessels Pip. 161, 41–49.

6.                  Bakhtiari, R. et al.  2017. Fitness for service assessment of a pressure vessel subjected to fire damage in a refinery unit. Eng,  Failure Anal, 80(Supplement C), 444–452.

7.                  Zangeneh, S. Lashgari, H.R. Sharifi, H.R. 2020. Fitness-for-service assessment and failure analysis of AISI 304 demineralized-water (DM) pipeline weld crack,  Eng Failure Anal, 107, 104210.
 

8.                  Han, Z. et al. 2016. Fitness-for-service of a column equipment containing dent defects based on API 579 Level 3 analysis and considering the dynamic loads. in ASME 2016 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference.

9.                  Bakhtiari, R. Zangeneh, S. 2018. Evaluation of hydrogen damage in a fire tube using microstructure/mechanical properties studies, Eng. Fail. Anal,  90, 231–244.

10.              Attia, M.S., et al., 2016. Assessment of corrosion damage acceptance criteria in API579-ASME/1 code. International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design,. 12(1): p. 141-151.       

11.              Peng, J., C. Zhou, and Q. Dai. 2013. Interaction and Assessment of Multiple Local Wall Thinning Defects. in ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference.

12.              Yamaguchi, A. 2013. Investigation of Burst Pressure in Pipes With Square Wall Thinning by Using FEA and API579 FFS-1. in ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference.

13.              Domizzi, G. Anteri, G. Ovejero-Garcı ´a, J. 2001. Influence of sulphur content and inclusion distribution on the hydrogen induced blister cracking in pressure vessel and pipeline steels, Corrosion Sci. 43(2), 325–339.

14.              Boukortt, H. et al. 2018, Hydrogen embrittlement effect on the structural integrity of API 5L X52 steel pipeline,  Int. J. Hydrog, Energy. 43(42), 19615–19624.

15.              Park, C. Kang, N. Liu, S. 2017. Effect of grain size on the resistance to hydrogen embrittlement of API 2W Grade 60 steels using in situ slow-strain-rate testing,  Corros, Sci, 128, 33–41.        
 

16.              Javidi, M. Ghassemi, A. Lalehparvar , M,M. 2017. Amine corrosion and amine cracking of API 5L X52 carbon steel in the presence of hydrogen sulphide and carbon dioxide. Corros. Eng., Sci. Technol, 52(7), 510–519.

17.              Soudani, M. et al. 2018. Efficiency of green inhibitors against hydrogen embrittlement on mechanical properties of pipe steel API 5L X52 in hydrochloric acid medium. J Bio- and Tribo-Corrosion. 4(3), 36.

18.              Chatzidouros, E.V. et al. 2011. Hydrogen effect on fracture toughness of pipeline steel welds, with in situ hydrogen charging. Int, J. Hydrog. Energy. 36(19), 12626–12643.

19.              API 579-1/ASME FFS-1. 2021 .FITNESS FOR-SERVICE. Page of 515, 9-22.  

20.              Sharples, J. Hadley, I. 2018. Treatment of residual stress in fracture assessment: background to the advice given in BS 7910:2013. Int.J. Press. Vessels Pip. 168, 323–334.        

21.              Bouchard, P,J.  2007. Validated residual stress profiles for fracture assessments of stainless steel pipe girth welds. Int. J. Press, Vessels Pip. 84(4), 195–222.