Investigation of Comparative Advantage and Supporting Policies of Date in Kerman Province

Subject Areas : Agricultural Economics Research

F. Shirani Bidabadi ¹ , R. Jolaie ² , H.R. Yousefzadeh ³

1 - نویسنده
2 - نویسنده
3 - نویسنده

Received: 2015-12-18 Accepted : 2015-12-18 Published : 2011-06-22

Keywords: Comparative Advantage, Kerman, Date, Effective Protection Coefficient, Domestic Resource Cost,

Abstract :

Comparative advantage is an economic term which is used to compare potential and actual production capacity of a country in a given commodity with the rest of the world. Iran is one of the main producers of dates. Thus, study of Iran’s comparative advantage in production of dates is very important from the stand point of de facto production. This study used Policy Analyses Matrix (PAM) and Domestic Resource Cost (DRC) for calculating the comparative advantage of date in Kerman province. For investigation support policies PAM indices were used. Amount of DRC index for date was 1.8 that demonstrated comparative disadvantage for this product. Nominal Protection Coefficient (NPC) index was 1.05 that indicated domestic policies increased farmer's income to the level which is above international prices. Nominal Protection Coefficient of Input (NPCI) index showed the effect of government policies on input prices. This index was 0.60 for Kerman date that showed government paid input subsidy to farmers. Effective Protection Coefficient (EPC) index was an index which showed outcome of government policies regarding both input used by the farmers and farmers' income. This index was 1.23 for Kerman date , that indicated government support for the product
 

References:

1. FAO, (2001) Policy analysis study: Egypt. Comparativeadvantage and competitiveness of major crops. Food and

Agriculture Organization of the United Nation.

2. Hussain M, Anwar S, and Hussai Z. 2006. Economics ofSugarcane Production in Pakistan: A Price Risk

Analysis,International Research Journal of Finance andEconomics, Issue 4. http://www.eurojournals.com/finance.html

3. Jiran A. and Jolaee R., 2005, study of comparative advantage andsupport indices of red meat., Agricultural Economics andDevelopment, 13(49), Tehran, Iran (in Persian)

4. Jolaee R. 2004, Managing cropping pattern of agricultural cropsin three cenbtral districts of Fars province using molti regionalmodel, PhD thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbit ModarasUniversity (in Persian)

5. Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture. 2005, Data Bank ofHorticultural crops. www.maj.ir

6. Mohanty S. Ch Fang. And J Chaundhary. 2002. Assessing thecompetitivness of Indian cotton production: A policy analysismatrix aproach, Center of agriculture and rural development,Iowa state university, Working paper 02-wp301.

7. Monke E. and S. Pearson. 1989. The policy analysis matrix foragricultural development, Ithaca. NY: Cornell university press.

8. Mosanejad M. 1996, comparative advantage of agricultural cropsand export promotion policy, Research report, AgriculturalPlanning and Economic Research Institute (APERI), Tehran, Iran.(in Persian).

9. Noori K. and Jahannama F. 2008, study of comparative advantageof spring Soybean in Iran. Research and construction inagronomy and Horticulture, 79 Summer 2008 issue. (in Persian).

10. Salvatore D. 1995, Teory and problems of internationalEconomics, Transelation, Nai publication House, Tehran, Iran.