Study of Factors Affecting Investment and Ways of Securing Liquidity:Case Study of Rural Cooperatives in Fars Province

Subject Areas : Agricultural Economics Research

B. Najafi ¹ , M.H. Tarazkar ² , A. Shirvanian ³

1 - استاد دانشگاه شیراز و دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد مرودشت
2 - دانشجوی دکترای اقتصاد کشاورزی دانشگاه شیراز
3 - دانشجوی دکترای اقتصاد کشاورزی دانشگاه شیراز

Received: 2015-12-17 Accepted : 2015-12-17 Published : 2011-12-22

Keywords: Investment theory, securing liquidity, rural cooperatives and Fars province,

Abstract :

With sequence to role of cash flow in agriculture, the object of the study is to recognize factors affecting investment and ways of securing liquidity in rural cooperatives. Data were collected from a sample of 32 cooperatives, 15 rural cooperatives manager and 152 member of rural cooperative in Fars province. Results of the study reveled that access to cash played a major role in investment behavior of cooperatives. In addition, other factors such as marginal profitability, scale and debt-capital ratio affecting on decision to invest. Also, results indicated that only 33 percent of cooperatives manager had suitable finance managerial ability. Finally, ways of securing liquidity in rural cooperatives were suggested  

References:

1. Ahmadpour, M. Hosseini, R. 2007. Factors affecting credit

demand in Sistan. Journal of Agricultural Economics and

Development.58: 91-110.

2. Bierlen, R. W. and A. M. Featherstone. 1998. Fundamental q,

cash flow, and investment: Evidence from farm panel data. The

Review of Economics and Statistics. 80: 427-435.

3. Chaddad, F. R., M. L. Cook and T. Heckelei. 2005. Testing for

the presence of financial constraints in US agricultural

cooperatives: An investment behavior approach. Journal of

Agricultural Economics. 56: 385-397.

4. Erickson, T. and T. M. Whited. 2000. Measurement error and the

relationship between investment and q. Journal of Political

Economy. 108:1027-57.

5. Hassanpourkashani,. S. 2007. Study of financial constraints and

investment in production cooperatives of Fars province. M.S.

Thesis. Shiraz University. Shiraz 1027-1057.

6. Hoshi, T., A. K. Kashyap and D. Scharfstein. 1991. Corporate

structure, liquidity, and investment: Evidence from Japanese

industrial groups. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 106: 33-60.

7. Murray, G. 1983. Management strategies for corporate in British

agricultural cooperatives. Agricultural Administration. 14: 51-63.

8. Rokneddineftekhari,E. R. and Einali, J. Effects of microcredit on

agricultural development. Agricultural Economics and

Development. 56:45-76.

9. Russo, C. and M. Sabbatini. 2002. Equity management practices

in Italian agricultural cooperatives: A cluster analysis approach.

EAAE Congress