A Neutrosophic Approach to the Diet Problem: Enhancing Accuracy and Flexibility in Dietary Planning
Subject Areas : Fuzzy Optimization and Modeling JournalSamira Valipour 1 , Amirhossein Nafei 2
1 - Farvardin Institute of Higher Education, Ghaemshahr, Iran
2 - Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan
Keywords: Diet Problem, Food Mixture, Linear Programming, Uncertainty, Neutrosophic Triplets,
Abstract :
The diet problem, as a critical challenge in the health science and the food industry, involves optimizing the combination of foods to meet nutritional requirements at minimal cost. This research presents a novel and flexible linear programming model for the diet problem, integrating neutrosophic triplets to manage the inherent uncertainties and indeterminacies in nutritional data. Neutrosophic logic extends fuzzy logic by introducing an indeterminacy component, allowing for a more nuanced representation of the variability in the food nutritional contents and costs. In our study, we examine eight types of food and four essential nutrients, representing each food’s cost and nutritional content as neutrosophic triplets. These triplets encapsulate the degrees of truth, indeterminacy, and falsity inherent in the data. By converting the neutrosophic triplets into crisp values using a specific score function, we enable the application of traditional linear programming techniques. Our model aims to minimize the cost while ensuring that the diet meets all specified nutritional constraints. The practical implications of the neutrosophic model are demonstrated through a comprehensive case study, highlighting its effectiveness in diet planning and its applications within the food industry. The results underscore the model’s ability to handle data uncertainties robustly, providing a reliable and adaptable solution to the diet problem. This approach not only enhances the precision of dietary planning but also supports improved decision-making processes within the food industry, ultimately contributing to better health outcomes and more efficient resource utilization.
1. Azimi, S.M., Chun, H., Zhihong, C. & Nafei, A. (2021). A new approach for solving interval neutrosophic integer programming problems. Fuzzy Optimization and Modeling Journal, 2(2), 1-11.
2. Babaie-Kafaki, S., Ghanbari, R. & Mahdavi-Amiri, N. An efficient and practically robust hybrid metaheuristic algorithm for solving fuzzy bus terminal location problems, Asia–Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 29(2) (2012) 1-25.
3. Eiselt, H.A. & Sandblom C.L. Linear Programming and its Applications, Springer, Newyork (2007).
4. Geissler, C. & Powers, H. Human Nutrition, Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017).
5. Izonin, I., Ribino, P., Ebrahimnejad, A. & Quinde, M (2023). Smart technologies and its application for medical/healthcare services. Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments, 9, 1–3.
6. Li, J.T.. Liao, B., Lan, C.Y., Qiu, J.W. & Shu, W.S. (2007). Zinc, nickel and cadmium in carambolas marketed in Guangzhou and Hong Kong, China: Implication for human health. Science of The Total Environment, 388, 405-412.
7. Nafei, A., Javadpour, A., Nasseri, H., & Yuan, W. (2021). Optimized score function and its application in group multiattribute decision making based on fuzzy neutrosophic sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 36(12), 7522-7543.
8. Smarandache, F. A Unifying Field in Logics: Neutrosophic Logic, Neutrosophy, Neutrosophic Set, Neutrosophic Probability, 4th Edition, Infinite Study (2005).
9. Sun, C.H. Nutrition and Food Hygiene; Peoples Medical Publishing Press, Beijing (2012).
10. Wang, H., Smarandache, F., Sunderraman, R. & Zhang, Y.Q. Interval Neutrosophic Sets and Logic: Theory and Applications in Computing, Computing Research Repository (2005).
E-ISNN: 2676-7007 | Fuzzy Optimization and Modelling Journal 5(2) (2024) 72-81 |
|
|
|
|
Contents lists available at FOMJ
Fuzzy Optimization and Modelling Journal
Journal homepage: https://sanad.iau.ir/journal/fomj/ | ||
|
Paper Type: Research Paper
A Neutrosophic Approach to the Diet Problem: Enhancing Accuracy and Flexibility in Dietary Planning
Samira Valipour a, *, Amirhossein Nafei b
a Farvardin Institute of Higher Education, Qaemshahr, Iran.
b Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.
A R T I C L E I N F O |
| A B S T R A C T The diet problem, as a critical challenge in the health science and the food industry, involves optimizing the combination of foods to meet nutritional requirements at minimal cost. This research presents a novel and flexible linear programming model for the diet problem, integrating neutrosophic triplets to manage the inherent uncertainties and indeterminacies in nutritional data. Neutrosophic logic extends fuzzy logic by introducing an indeterminacy component, allowing for a more nuanced representation of the variability in the food nutritional contents and costs. In our study, we examine eight types of food and four essential nutrients, representing each food’s cost and nutritional content as neutrosophic triplets. These triplets encapsulate the degrees of truth, indeterminacy, and falsity inherent in the data. By converting the neutrosophic triplets into crisp values using a specific score function, we enable the application of traditional linear programming techniques. Our model aims to minimize the cost while ensuring that the diet meets all specified nutritional constraints. The practical implications of the neutrosophic model are demonstrated through a comprehensive case study, highlighting its effectiveness in diet planning and its applications within the food industry. The results underscore the model’s ability to handle data uncertainties robustly, providing a reliable and adaptable solution to the diet problem. This approach not only enhances the precision of dietary planning but also supports improved decision-making processes within the food industry, ultimately contributing to better health outcomes and more efficient resource utilization. |
Article history: Received 1 July 2024 Revised 21July 2024 Accepted 3 August 2024 Available online 26 August 2024 | ||
Keywords: Diet Problem Food Mixture Linear Programming Uncertainty Neutrosophic Triplets |
1. Introduction
Human tissues contain a variety of natural elements, with over twenty crucial for supporting body metabolism and physiological functions [8]. These elements regulate cell membrane permeability, maintain inorganic ion concentrations in fluids inside and outside cells, support osmotic pressure, and help balance acid-base levels. Inadequate nutrient intake can disrupt metabolic processes and lead to subclinical deficiencies or nutritional diseases. So, it is very important that these substances are included in the daily diet to prevent potentially dangerous consequences.
Elements like K, Na, Ca, Mg, and P, making up more than 0.01% of body content, are termed macro-elements. Those with less than 0.01%, such as Fe, Cu, Zn, Cr, Mn, and Se, are trace elements, critical for metabolism and must be obtained continuously from food [14]. Nutrient intake significantly impacts human health, with both excess and deficiency potentially causing physiological abnormalities or disease. While necessary in small amounts, trace elements have narrow curative and toxic dose ranges, with excessive intake can enhance toxicity risks [8].
A dietary pattern refers to the quantity, variety, or combination of foods and beverages consumed. Different dietary patterns, influenced by nutritional content like high vegetable intake, fibers, animal fats, or processed foods rich in sodium and sugar, are associated with diverse health outcomes [8]. Food security, defined as access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food for an active and healthy life, is essential for maintaining health [14].
The daily diet of each individual can vary based on their age, gender, economic status, livelihood, and cultural background. For example, women over 25 years old require a daily intake of 25 grams of protein, whereas men over 25 years old require 63 grams of protein daily. Proteins prevent the loss of muscle tissue and are also highly effective in repairing skin and dental tissues. Proteins are made of amino acids. From a nutritional perspective, amino acids are categorized into three groups: essential, nonessential, and semiessential. Semi essential amino acids are produced by the body but are considered essential during times of stress. Nine amino acids are classified as essential because they cannot be synthesized by the human body and must be obtained from the diet. Nonessential amino acids, on the other hand, can be synthesized by the body even if they are not primarily derived from the diet. Semiessential amino acids are crucial for growth and development, particularly in children and pregnant women [8,14].
A balanced diet consists of proportionate ratios of carbohydrates, proteins, fats, vitamins, and minerals tailored to each individual’s needs. These ratios can vary depending on the person. Today, with advancements in science and technology, there is a growing desire among people for a higher quality of life alongside quantity. People now place significant importance on their dietary regimen across various lifestyles. Therefore, the role of nutrition specialists and dieticians in accurately calculating and tailoring dietary regimens to each individual becomes increasingly prominent amid these developments. However, assessing individual dietary intake poses methodological challenges, including accuracy, representativeness, and interpretation issues regarding energy and nutrient adequacy. It is often assessed probabilistically due to the inability to pinpoint individuals with inadequate intake [10]. Nevertheless, in the contemporary world, modern techniques exist that are capable of handling such uncertain situations [8,14].
In the realm of health science and the food industry, the diet problem represents a critical decision-making challenge, focusing on the optimal selection of foods to satisfy nutritional requirements while minimizing costs [7]. The complexity of this problem is amplified by the inherent uncertainties and indeterminacies in nutritional data, which arise from various factors such as agricultural practices, food processing methods, and individual dietary patterns [10]. Accurate and effective dietary planning is essential for promoting health, preventing nutritional deficiencies, and ensuring food security, underscoring the importance of developing robust models to address these issues [9].
Traditional approaches to the diet problem have predominantly relied on linear programming (LP) models [7]. These models are favored for their simplicity and the availability of efficient algorithms for their solution. However, the deterministic nature of classical LP models often falls short in capturing the uncertainties associated with real-world dietary data. For instance, the nutritional content of foods can vary significantly due to factors like soil quality, climate conditions, and food preparation techniques. Similarly, the cost of food items can fluctuate based on market dynamics, supply chain disruptions, and economic conditions. These variations necessitate a more flexible and comprehensive approach to model the diet problem effectively.
The motivation behind this study lies in the need for a more realistic and adaptable model that can handle the uncertainties and variabilities inherent in dietary data. Given the importance of accurate dietary planning for health and well-being, there is a significant demand for models that can incorporate and manage the imprecision and indeterminacies in nutritional information. Neutrosophic logic [13], with its capacity to represent truth, indeterminacy, and falsity simultaneously, offers a promising solution to this challenge.
As an extension of fuzzy logic [4], neutrosophic logic provides a powerful framework to handle uncertainty, indeterminacy, and inconsistency in data [15]. It incorporates an additional degree of indeterminacy, allowing for a more nuanced representation of real-world complexities [12]. In the neutrosophic theory, each element is characterized by three components: truth-membership (), indeterminacy-membership (), and falsity-membership (). These components capture the varying degrees of certainty, uncertainty, and falsehood associated with a particular piece of information [3].
In recent years, extensive research has been conducted on fuzzy set theory and its various extensions. Bayanati et al. [6] developed a methodology for prioritizing organizations in the tire industry based on their adoption of sustainable supply chain management practices, with a specific focus on mitigating environmental risks. Zhang et al. [11] introduced a decision framework to assess manufacturing companies' preferences for blockchain technology in Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM). Ada [1] proposed an innovative approach for supplier selection in sustainable agri-food supply chains by integrating the Fuzzy Analytic Network Process (FANP) and fuzzy VIKOR methods into a two-step hybrid solution. Bai et al. [5] utilized blockchain technology to create a hierarchical enabler framework to enhance Sustainable Supply Chain Transparency (SSCT) in the cocoa industry. Agrawal et al. [2] identified Critical Success Factors (CSFs) for the effective adoption of Sustainable Green Supply Chain Management (SGSCM) in the Indian brass manufacturing sector. Nafei et al. [20] presented a neutrosophic fuzzy decision-making framework that combines TOPSIS and autocratic methodology for selecting machines in industrial factories.
The objectives of this research are listed as follows:
· Integrating neutrosophic logic into traditional linear programming models for the diet problem enables the simultaneous representation of truth, indeterminacy, and falsity in dietary data;
· To develop a specific score function for converting neutrosophic triplets into crisp values, facilitating the application of linear programming techniques to manage data uncertainties in dietary planning;
· To demonstrate the practical implications of the proposed neutrosophic model through a comprehensive case study, showcasing its effectiveness in optimizing diet plans and supporting decision-making processes within the food industry.
This study proposes a novel application of neutrosophic logic to the diet problem, aiming to enhance the accuracy and robustness of dietary planning models. By representing food items’ cost and nutritional content as neutrosophic triplets [3], we can more accurately reflect the variability and uncertainty inherent in dietary data. The proposed model converts these neutrosophic triplets into crisp values using a specific score function [10], facilitating the application of LP techniques to solve the diet problem. This approach provides a more flexible and realistic diet planning framework and significantly contributes to the field by integrating modern decision-making tools with traditional LP methods [13].
This research makes several contributions to the field of dietary planning and optimization:
· Integration of Neutrosophic Logic: This research introduces the application of neutrosophic logic to the diet problem, an area where traditional linear programming models often fall short. By incorporating neutrosophic triplets, the study addresses the inherent uncertainties and indeterminacies in nutritional data, offering a more nuanced and realistic approach to dietary planning.
· Novel Modeling Approach: The study develops a novel and flexible linear programming model that integrates neutrosophic triplets. This innovative approach allows for the simultaneous representation of truth, indeterminacy, and falsity in dietary data, thereby enhancing the model's robustness and reliability.
· Enhanced Decision-Making: By converting neutrosophic triplets into crisp values using a specific score function, the study enables the application of traditional linear programming techniques. This hybrid approach not only maintains the simplicity and efficiency of LP models but also significantly improves their ability to handle data uncertainties, leading to more accurate and adaptable dietary recommendations.
· Practical Implications: The practical applicability of the proposed model is demonstrated through a comprehensive case study. The results highlight the model's effectiveness in diet planning and its potential applications within the food industry. The study underscores how this approach can support better decision-making processes, contributing to improved health outcomes and more efficient resource utilization.
· Contribution to Health Sciences and Food Industry: This research bridges the gap between advanced mathematical modeling and practical applications in health sciences and the food industry. By providing a robust framework for generating reliable dietary recommendations, the study supports the formulation of balanced diets, prevention of nutritional deficiencies, and promotion of overall health and well-being.
· Foundation for Future Research: The introduction of neutrosophic logic into dietary planning opens new avenues for further research. This study sets the stage for exploring more sophisticated methods for determining and validating neutrosophic triplets, developing alternative score functions, and integrating this approach with other advanced decision-making frameworks such as multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) or machine learning.
The paper proceeds as follows. Section 2 discusses a classic LP model for the diet problem. In Section 3, we present a detailed formulation of the neutrosophic model of the problem, followed by a method for converting neutrosophic triplets into crisp values. To support our analytical efforts, we numerically test the given model in Section 4, in which the effectiveness of our approach is demonstrated through a comprehensive case study involving eight food items and four essential nutrients. The case study highlights the practical implications of the neutrosophic model for diet planning and the food industry, showcasing its ability to manage data uncertainties and support better decision-making. Finally, we summarize the concluding remarks in Section 5.
2. Linear programming model of the diet problem
As known, LP is widely recognized as a powerful tool that bridges the gap between mathematical programming and decision-making. This methodology frequently appears in various domains, including management, health science, economics, and engineering, due to its robust framework and versatility in solving optimization problems [7]. The popularity of LP models is largely attributed to their linear structure, which simplifies both the objective function and the constraints, making them highly interpretable and manageable.
One of the core strengths of the LP lies in its ability to efficiently handle a wide range of optimization problems [7]. Given the availability of effective algorithms for solving LP models, it is a common practice to approximate other mathematical programming models within the LP framework. This adaptability ensures that LP remains preferred for various optimization scenarios, providing clear and actionable solutions to complex problems.
A prominent application of LP in health science is the diet problem, also known as the food mixture problem. This problem focuses on selecting the optimal quantities of different foods to meet specified nutritional requirements at the lowest possible cost. The diet problem exemplifies the practical application of LP in real-world scenarios, addressing economic and health-related concerns. In the context of the diet problem, two primary versions can be formulated within the LP framework [7]:
§ Minimizing the cost of the diet: This version aims to reduce the overall cost of the diet while satisfying specific nutritional constraints. The objective is to ensure that all essential nutrients are included in the diet in adequate amounts, without exceeding a predetermined budget;
§ Maximizing the nutritional content: This version focuses on maximizing the nutritional values of the diet subject to budget constraints. Here, the goal is to achieve the highest possible nutritional intake within a fixed cost limit, ensuring that the diet remains affordable while being nutritionally rich.
To model the first version of the diet problem, we generally need to consider the following parameters:
§ Types of food (): Different food items available for inclusion in the diet;
§ Types of nutrients (): Various essential nutrients that must be included in the diet.
For each food item and nutrient , we define
§ : The amount of nutrient in one unit of food ;
§ : The cost of one serving of food ;
§ : The diet’s minimum acceptable quantities of nutrient ;
§ : The diet’s maximum acceptable quantities of nutrient .
A sample data set for the dietary plan has been provided in Table 1 [7]. Especially, using these parameters, the problem can be formulated as follows [7]:
In this formulation, the objective function represents the total cost of the diet, which we aim to be minimized. Also, here the decision variable shows the quantity of the th food, .
By solving this LP model, we can determine the optimal combination of the food items that meet the nutritional requirements at the lowest cost. This approach provides a structured and effective method for diet planning, highlighting the practicality and utility of the LP models in addressing complex decision-making problems in the health science. However, it is worthy to note that the exact value of the diet data may not be provided because of the uncertain environment surrounded the health care.
Table 1. A sample standard data set for the diet problem (RDA: Recommended Daily Allowance)
Food | Price ($) | Protein | Fiber | Carbs | Calories | Cholesterol | Vitamin A | Vitamin C | Saturated fat | Sodium | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Big Leo Burger | 3.29 | 24 | 3 | 44 | 530 | 65 | 10% | 4% | 10 | 1,020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Banana Split | 53.99 | 8 | 3 | 96 | 510 | 30 | 3% | 33% | 8 | 180 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raw broccoli, 1 cup | 450 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 25 | 0 | 27% | 137% | 0 | 24 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Whole grain bagel | 480 | 5 | 3 | 27 | 140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 270 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2% Milk, I cup | 400 | 8.5 | 0 | 13 | 130 | 20 | 10% | 4% | 3 | 125 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange juice, 1 cup | 250 | 2 | I | 27 | 110 | 0 | 2% | 100% | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RDA | ----- | 56 | 30 | 130 | K | 300 | 100% | 100% | 24 | 2,400 |
Food | Cost () | Nutrient 1 () | Nutrient 2 () | Nutrient 3 () | Nutrient 4 () | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Food 1 | (0.9, 0.1, 0.1) | (0.9, 0.1, 0.1) | (0.5, 0.2, 0.1) | (0.8, 0.2, 0.1) | (0.6, 0.2, 0.1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Food 2 | (0.8, 0.1, 0.2) | (0.7, 0.2, 0.1) | (0.6, 0.1, 0.2) | (0.4, 0.3, 0.2) | (0.7, 0.1, 0.2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Food 3 | (0.7, 0.2, 0.1) | (0.8, 0.1, 0.2) | (0.7, 0.2, 0.1) | (0.5, 0.1, 0.3) | (0.8, 0.2, 0.1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Food 4 | (0.6, 0.3, 0.1) | (0.6, 0.3, 0.1) | (0.9, 0.2, 0.1) | (0.3, 0.2, 0.4) | (0.5, 0.3, 0.1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Food 5 | (0.9, 0.1, 0.2) | (0.5, 0.2, 0.2) | (0.4, 0.1, 0.3) | (0.7, 0.2, 0.1) | (0.6, 0.1, 0.3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Food 6 | (0.7, 0.1, 0.3) | (0.7, 0.1, 0.3) | (0.5, 0.3, 0.2) | (0.6, 0.1, 0.2) | (0.7, 0.1, 0.2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Food 7 | (0.8, 0.2, 0.2) | (0.8, 0.2, 0.2) | (0.6, 0.2, 0.2) | (0.5, 0.2, 0.2) | (0.8, 0.2, 0.2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Food 8 | (0.6, 0.3, 0.2) | (0.6, 0.3, 0.2) | (0.5, 0.3, 0.2) | (0.4, 0.3, 0.2) | (0.7, 0.3, 0.2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bounds | ----- |
|
|
|
|
Food | Cost () | Nutrient 1 () | Nutrient 2 () | Nutrient 3 () | Nutrient 4 () |
Food 1 | 3.38 | 3.38 | 1.82 | 3.04 | 2.28 |
Food 2 | 2.85 | 2.66 | 2.28 | 1.88 | 2.66 |
Food 3 | 2.66 | 2.85 | 2.66 | 1.90 | 3.04 |
Food 4 | 2.38 | 2.38 | 3.42 | 1.52 | 2.28 |
Food 5 | 2.85 | 1.88 | 1.96 | 2.66 | 2.28 |
Food 6 | 2.28 | 2.28 | 1.82 | 2.28 | 2.66 |
Food 7 | 2.66 | 2.66 | 2.28 | 1.88 | 3.04 |
Food 8 | 2.38 | 2.38 | 1.82 | 1.52 | 2.66 |