The effect of different time periods following blood flow occlusion cycles on performance in competitive judo athletes
Subject Areas : Physiology of Fitnessamin Farzaneh hesari 1 , mojtaba farzaneh 2 , yosef goliyan 3
1 - Department of Exercise Physiology, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran
2 - Department of Exercise Physiology, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari
3 - Department of Exercise Physiology, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University
Keywords: ischemia, special judo test, anaerobic performance,
Abstract :
Introduction and Purpose: Cycles of blood flow occlusion (BFO) leads to improvement in sports performance, but the effect of time periods between occlusion and exercise on performance is still unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different time periods following cycles of blood flow occlusion improves performance in competitive judo athletes. Material and Methods: In a randomized, crossover study, 10 competitive judo athletes participate in this study. Each subject was randomized in three conditions: occlusion 20 minute before exercise, occlusion 20 minute before exercise and a sham intervention without ischemia. Two special judo test (SJFT) with an interval of 60 second and a RAST test 15 minute after 2th SJFT were performed in per session. BFO was conducted with fasten of elastic wraps to the upper thighs and consisted of three 5-minute cycles of ischemia, followed by five minutes of perfusion. One-way repeated measures ANOVA and Benferroni post-hoc test were used. Findings: Blood flow occlusion had no significant effect in index of first and second special judo test. BFO 5 and 20 min perior exercise resulted in significant improvement peak power and mean power than sham. Conclusion: It seems that blood flow occlusion in 5 and 20 min before exercise, do not improve special judo fitness test and improves anaerobic power in competitive judo athletes.
1. Murry C E. Jennings, R B. Reimer, K A. Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium. Circulation. 1996, 74(5):1124-36.
2. Candilio, L. Hausenloy, D J. Yellon, D M. Remote ischemic conditioning: a clinical trial's update. J Cardio vasc Pharmacol Ther. 2011, 16(3):304-12.
3. De Groot, P C. Thijssen, D H. Sanchez, M. Ellenkamp, R. Hopman, M T. Ischemic preconditioning improves maximal performance in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011,108(1):141-6.
4. Incognito A, Burr J, Millar P. The Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning on Human Exercise Performance. Sports Med J. 2015,15:4, 245-258.
5. Jean-St-Michel, E. Manlhiot, C. Li, J. Remote preconditioning improves maximal performance in highly trained athletes. Med Sci Sports Exer. 2012, 43(7):1280-6.
6. Clevidence, M W. Mowery, R E. Kushnick, M R. The effects of ischemic preconditioning on aerobic and anaerobic variables associated with submaximal cycling performance. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016, 112(10):3649-54.
7. Gibson, N. White, J. Neish, M. Effect of Ischemic Preconditioning on Land-Based Sprinting in Team-Sport Athletes. Int J Sports Physiol and Perform. 2014, 8: 671-676.
8. Sterkowicz, S. Franchini, E. Specific fitness of elite and novice judoists. Hum Kinet. 2001, 6(2): 44-52.
9. Lalonde, F. Curnier, D. Can anaerobic performance is improved by remote ischemic preconditioning? Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2015, 5, 68-79.
10. Zagatto AM, Beck WR, Gobatto CA. Validity of the running anaerobic sprint test for assessing anaerobic power and predicting short-distance performances. The Journal of Srength and Conditioning Research; 2019, 23(6): 1820-1827.
11. Patterson, S. Bezodis, N. Glaister, M. Pattison. J. The Effect of Ischemic Preconditioning on Repeated Sprint Cycling Performance. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2017,24(5), 63-74.
12. Sabbagh, S. Henry Salzman, M M. Kloner, R A. Simkhovich, B Z. Rezkalla, S H. Remote ischemic preconditioning for coronary artery bypass graft operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016, 96(2):727-36.
13. Wang, W Z. Stepheson, L L. Fang, X H. Khiabani, K T. Zamboni, W A. Ischemic preconditioning-induced microvascular protection at a distance. J ReconstrMicrosurg. 2014, 20: 175–181.
14. Kanoria, S. Glantzounis, G. Quaglia, A. Dinesh, S. Fusai, G. Davidson, B R. Seifalian, A M. Remote preconditioning improves hepatic oxygenation after ischaemia reperfusion injury. TransplInt. 2016, 25: 783–791.
15. Zhou, K. Yang, B. Zhou, X M. Tan, C M. Zhao, Y. Huang, C. Liao, X B. Xiao, H B. Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on the flow pattern of the left anterior descending coronary artery in normal subjects. Int J Cardiol. 2017, 122: 250–251.
16. Enko, K. Nakamura, K. Yunoki, K. Miyoshi, T. Akagi, S. Yoshida, M. Toh, N. Sangawa, M. Nishii, N. Nagase, S. Kohno, K. Morita, H. Kusano, KF. Ito H. Intermittent arm ischemia induces vasodilatation of the contralateral upper limb. J Physiol Sci. 2014, 61:507–513.
17. Mansour, Z. Bouitbir, J. Charles, A L. Talha, S. Kindo, M. Pottecher, J. Zoll, J. Geny, B. (2012). Remote and local ischemic preconditioning equivalently protects rat skeletal muscle mitochondrial function during experimental aortic cross-clamping. J Vasc Surg. 55:497–505, e491.
18. Kraus, A. Pasha, E. Machin, D. Kloner, R. (2015). Bilateral Upper Limb Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Improves Peak Anaerobic Power. Sport Med. 9: 1-6.
19. Pang, C Y. Yang, R Z. Zhong, A. Xu, N. Boyd, B. Forrest, C R. Acute ischemic preconditioning protects against skeletal muscle infarction in the pig. Cardiovasc Res. 2016, 29: 782–788.
20. Loenneke J, Kearney ML, Thrower AD, Collins S, Pujol TJ. The acute response of practical occlusion in the knee extensors. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 2015, 24: 10, 2831-34.
