Improving renewable energy policy planning and decision-making through MCDM combined method

Hossein Babaei ¹ ( Ph.D Student, Department of Industrial Engineering, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran )
Mehran Khalaj ² ( Assistant professor, Department of Industrial Engineering, Parand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran )
Maryam Dehghanbaghi ³ ( Assistant professor, Department of Industrial Engineering, Parand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran )
Ahmad Ebrahimi ⁴ ( Assistant professor, Department of Industrial Management and Technology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran )

Submited date : 2023-09-29 Accepted date : 2024-11-07

Keywords: : improving planning , decision-making , renewable energy policy, MCDM combined method,

Abstract :

Abstract

Introduction:Renewable Energy (RE) is a powerful solution to climate change, ensuring energy and getting it right. With the help of facilitating problems and surrounding system problems, the use of renewable energy is an important vehicle and it is not possible to benefit from it to renew the main inscription in the energy industry.

Method:In this case, it is theoretically not desirable to create a place for electrical installations such as solar among the various gases that determine and determine the installation and operation of the energy production system in your home. And a technical and economic proposal is a matter of political decision. Result:This is where the sources of energy production are lost, which can be replenished on the sides of the underground water supply. Power generation sources to power your home have advantages and disadvantages based on the orientation of the carburetor area, which is very high in the home. For this reason, this is the single point of view of AHP. It is not easy to use for a while.

Discussion:The intensity of the benefits of your hair is partly in the form of a numerical calculation, at the end of the algorithm there is an invention to choose a suitable value to use.

References:

[1]P. Baringanire, K. Malik, S. Ghosh Banerjee, Scaling up access to electricity: the case of Rwanda. Live wire 2014/22, Washington, DC. https://openknowledge. worldbank.org/handle/10986/18680, 2014.
[2]EWSA, Expression of interest for scaling up renewable energy program (SREP) financing for energy projects in Rwanda, energy, water and sanitation agency. https://www.climateinvestmentfunds.org/sites/default/files/meetingdocuments/ rwanda_eoi_0.pdf, 2014.
[3]M.C. Mukeshimana, Z.Y. Zhao, M. Ahmad, M. Irfan, Analysis on barriers to biogas dissemination in Rwanda: AHP approach, Renew. Energy 163 (2021) 1127e1137, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.051.
[4]The republic of Rwanda, 7 Years government Programme : national strategy for transformation (NST1) 2017-2024. http://www.minecofin.gov.rw/ fileadmin/user_upload/NST1_7YGP_Final.pdf, 2017.
[5]MININFRA, Rural Electrification Strategy, Rwanda: ministry of infrastructure. http://www.reg.rw/fileadmin/user_upload/Rural_Electrification_Strategy.pdf, 2016.
MININFRA, Energy sector strategic plan 2018/19 - 2023/24. Rwanda: ministry of infrastructure. http://www.reg.rw/fileadmin/user_upload/Final_ESSP.pdf, 2018.
[6]M.I. Khan, Evaluating the strategies of compressed natural gas industry using an integrated SWOT and MCDM approach, J. Clean. Prod. 172 (2018) 1035e1052, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.231.
[7]Z.Y. Zhao, H. Yan, J. Zuo, Y.X. Tian, G. Zillante, A critical review of factors affecting the wind power generation industry in China, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 19 (2013) 499e508, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.066.
[8]E.B. Agyekum, M.N.S. Ansah, K.B. Afornu, Nuclear energy for sustainable development: SWOT analysis on Ghana's nuclear agenda, Energy Rep. 6 (2020) 107e115, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.11.163.
[9]A.J. Njoh, The SWOT model's utility in evaluating energy technology: illustrative application of a modified version to assess the sawdust cookstove's sustainability in Sub-Saharan Africa, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 69 (2017) 313e323, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.049.
[10]Y. Lei, X. Lu, M. Shi, L. Wang, H. Lv, S. Chen, C. Hu, Q. Yu, S.D.H. da Silveira, SWOT analysis for the development of photovoltaic solar power in Africa in comparison with China, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 77 (2019) 122e127, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.04.005.
[11]Yasir Ahmed Solangi, Cheng Longsheng, Syed Ahsan Ali Shah . 2021. Assessing and overcoming the renewable energy barriers for sustainable development in Pakistan: An integrated AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Renewable Energy Volume 173, August 2021, Pages 209-222.
[12]Buket Karatop, Buşra Taşkan, Elanur Adar, Cemalettin Kubat . 2021. Decision analysis related to the renewable energy investments in Turkey based on a Fuzzy AHP-EDAS-Fuzzy FMEA approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering Volume 151, January 2021, 106958.
AbdullahYildizbasi. 2021. Blockchain and renewable energy: Integration challenges in circular economy era. Renewable Energy Volume 176, October 2021, Pages 183-197.
[13]Fatine Ezbakhe, Agustí Pérez-Foguet. Decision analysis for sustainable development: The case of renewable energy planning under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research Volume 291, Issue 2, 1 June 2021, Pages 601-613.
[14]S.K.Saraswat, Abhijeet K.Digalwar. 2021. Evaluation of energy alternatives for sustainable development of energy sector in India: An integrated Shannon’s entropy fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach. Renewable Energy Volume 171, June 2021, Pages 58-74.
[15]Bahareh Oryani, Yoonmo Koo, Shahabaldin Rezania, Afsaneh Shafiee. . Barriers to renewable energy technologies penetration: Perspective in Iran. Renewable Energy Volume 174, August 2021, Pages 971-983.
[16]Mohamed Abdel-Basset, Abduallah Gamal, Ripon K. Chakrabortty, Michael J.Ryan. Evaluation approach for sustainable renewable energy systems under uncertain environment: A case study. Renewable Energy Volume 168, May 2021, Pages 1073-1095.
[17]Ali Mostafaeipour, Marzieh Alvandimanesh, Fatemeh Najafi, Alibek Issakhov. Identifying challenges and barriers for development of solar energy by using fuzzy best-worst method: A case study. Energy Volume 226, 1 July 2021, 120355
[18]Ernesto Mastrocinque, F. Javier Ramírez, AndrésHonrubia-Escribano, Duc T.Pham. An AHP-based multi-criteria model for sustainable supply chain development in the renewable energy sector. Expert Systems with Applications Volume 150, 15 July 2020, 113321.
[19]Rajvikram Madurai Elavarasan, Syed Afridhis, Raghavendra Rajan Vijayaraghavan, Umashankar Subramaniam, Mohammad Nurunnabi. SWOT analysis: A framework for comprehensive evaluation of drivers and barriers for renewable energy development in significant countries. Energy Reports Volume 6, November 2020, Pages 1838-1864.
[20]Mohammed Seddiki, Amar Bennadji. Multi-criteria evaluation of renewable energy alternatives for electricity generation in a residential building. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Volume 110, August 2019, Pages 101-117.
[21]Ying Wang, Li Xu, Yasir Ahmed Solangi. Strategic renewable energy resources selection for Pakistan: Based on SWOT-Fuzzy AHP approach. Sustainable Cities and Society Volume 52, January 2020, 101861
[22]J. Vishnupriyan P.S.Manoharan. Multi-criteria decision analysis for renewable energy integration: A southern India focus. Renewable Energy Volume 121, June 2018, Pages 474-488.