Cultural and Political Conservatism: The Significance of Moral Foundations

Subject Areas : INTERCULTURAL STUDIES QUARTERLY

mahmoudreza  rahbarghazi ¹ (استادیار علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه اصفهان)
samaneh  rahmani ² (دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه)
abolfazl  bafgeri ³ (دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه اصفهان)

Received: 2015-05-06 Accepted : 2015-07-08 Published : 2015-08-23

Keywords: Fairness, loyalty to a group, respecting authority, sacredness &amp, conservatism,

Abstract :

Assessing the effect of moral foundations on different aspects of socio-cultural and political life is difficult because there has not been sufficient data yet. However, doubtlessly, the influence of moral factors on humans’ behaviors is definitive. Although moral priorities are not necessarily determinant, they construct a complicated system of causal factors which can be important motivating factor in long term periods. Accordingly, the present study aims at investigate the effects of moral values on citizens’ orientations towards conservatism in cultural and political domains among students of University of Isfahan using Haidt and Graham’s Moral Foundations Theory. The present study also is to compare the degree of the relative significance of moral foundations as a variable determining of each ideas of political and cultural conservatism. The results of the present study indicate that moral foundations with coefficient determination as 45% can explain the highest variance of cultural conservatism. In addition, findings of the present study indicate that only two variables of care and respecting authority are effective on political conservatism, while care morality causes the reduction in political conservatism and the variable of respecting authority causes the increase in tendency towards political conservatism

References:

 

Ballew, C. C. & Todorov, A. (2007). Predicting political elections from rapid and unreflective face judgments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 17948–17953.

Boehm, C.(2012). Moral origins: The evolution of virtue, altruism, and shame. Basic Books.

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Graham, J., Haidt, J. & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029-1046.

Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366-385.

Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.

Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998-1002.

Haidt, J. (2008). Morality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 65–72.

Haidt, J. & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98–116.

Haidt, J. & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus: Special Issue on Human Nature, 133(4), 55–66.

Haidt, J. & Joseph, C. (2007). The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind (Vol. 3, pp. 367-391). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Haidt, J., Koller, S. & Dias, M. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 613–628.

Haidt, J. (2012) The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Random House LLC.

Hunter, J. D. (1991). Culture wars: The struggle to define America. New York: Basic Books.

Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61, 651–670.

Kinder, D. E. (1998). Opinion and action in the realm of politics. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 778–867). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Kohlberg, L.(1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive–developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347-480). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate: The essential guide for progressives. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.

Lieberman, M.(2013). Social:Why Our Brains are Wired To Connect Together. Crown.

McAdams, D. P. Albaugh, M., Farber, E., Daniels, J., Logan, R. L., Olson, B., et al. (2008). Family metaphors and moral in tuitions: How conservatives and liberals narrate their lives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 978– 990.

Shweder, R. A., Mahapatra, M., & Miller, J. (1987). Culture and moral development. In J. Kagan & S. Lamb (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children (pp. 1-83). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Suhler,Christopher L.and Patricia Churchland (2011). "Can innate, modular “foundations” explain morality? Challenges for Haidt's moral foundations theory."Journal of cognitive neuroscience 23, 2103-2116.