Comparative Studying of Two Fictional Elements in the narratives of " Zal and Rudabeh " with " Romeo and Juliet "

Subject Areas : Abstract Articles

Akram Nadiri Kiwi ¹ , Nahid Ja'fari ²

1 - Graduate of the Department of Persian Language and Literature, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran
2 - Assistant Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran.

Received: 2019-07-13 Accepted : 2020-01-15 Published : 2020-11-21

Keywords: Plot, Characterization, Elements of the story, Romeo and Juliet, Keywords: Zal and Rudabeh,

Abstract :

Abstract         One of the traits of the story which has significant role in the writing scheme, coherence, and its development, is characterization and plot; because the writer should know how and with what language and function to create a character and give him/her the suitable rank and role and untie the puzzles which have been emerged during the events. In the oriental and occidental language and literature, the reason that poetry and prose works appeal the literary men is that they not only are indebted to the attractiveness of these individuals and heroes of this kind of story but also are the reasons of personal interference and the language and thought of its creator. This research has been done in bibliographical method and in descriptive – analytical style to investigate the effective elements in creating plot and characterization of the two significant factors in the two narratives of " Zal and Rudabeh " and " Romeo and Juliet ". The result of the comparison of the two stories are very similar to each other and the different frequencies of the types of personality are close to each other, except two clear differences which appear in the number of symbolic and simple characters, in the view point of story plot in both narratives. One can distinguish five ties that in the beginning both explain contradicting families which bring about different hindrances but at the end one attains joy and unity while the other ends in sorrow and death.  

References:

فهرست منابع و مآخذ

• ابراهیمی، نادر، (1369)، لوازم نویسندگی، تهران: فرهنگان.


• اخوّت، احمد، (1392)، دستور زبان داستان، اصفهان: فردا.


• انوشه، حسن، (1376)، فرهنگ­نامه ادبی فارسی، (گزیدة اصطلاحات، مضامین و موضوعات ادبی فارسی/ دانشنامة ادب فارسی)، تهران: سازمان چاپ و انتشارات، چاپ اوّل.


• سرّامی، قدمعلی، (1383)، از رنگ گل تا رنج خار (شکل­شناسی داستان­های شاهنامه)، تهران: علمی و فرهنگی، چاپ چهارم.


• سلاجقه، پروین، (1380)، صدای خط خوردن مشق، تهران: معین.


• فردوسی، ابوالقاسم حسن بن احمد، (1380)، شاهنامة فردوسی (براساس نسخة نه جلدی چاپ مسکو)، زیر نظر برتلس، یوگنی ادواردوویچ، تهران: ققنوس.


• گارفیلد، لیون، (1391)، داستان­های شکسپیر، ترجمة حشمت کامرانی، تهران، هرمس (کیمیا).


• محمودیان، محمّد رفیع، (1382)، نظریّة رمان و ویژگی­های رمان فارسی، تهران: فرزان.


• مقدادی، بهرام، (1378)، فرهنگ اصطلاحات نقد ادبی، تهران: فکر روز.


• میرصادقی، جمال، (1376)، عناصر داستان، تهران: علمی.


• __________ ، (1376)، ادبیّات داستانی، (قصّه، رمانس، داستان کوتاه، رمان)، تهران: علمی.