The Relationship between the Mobility of Sperm on Pregnancy Results by Intrauterine Insemination
Subject Areas : Journal of Animal BiologyElnaz Lak 1 , Fatemeh Shahmolaghamsari 2 , Kamran Nasirzadeh 3 , Mahshid Elahi 4
1 - Departemant of Reproduction Biology, Research and Treatment Infertility Center, ACACER,Khouzestan, Ahwaz, Iran
2 - Research and Treatment Infertility Center, ACACER,Khouzestan, Ahwaz, Iran
3 - Research and Treatment Infertility Center, ACACER,Khouzestan, Ahwaz, Iran
4 - Research and Treatment Infertility Center, ACACER,Khouzestan, Ahwaz, Iran
Keywords: IUI, Sperm mobility, Pregnancy rates, Abortion rates, Birth rates,
Abstract :
Intrauterine insemination (IUI) is the first line of infertile couple treatment for its inexpensive and non-invasive. There is a wide range of indications like infertility with male causes, cervical-associated causes, and unknown causes for intrauterine sperm injection. Meanwhile, the main parameters of sperm such as count, mobility, and morphology of sperm play a key role in the success of this method. One of the significant problems in the quality of sperm is the reduced mobility of sperms. Based on the WHO, the mobility under 50%, concentration over 20 million, and morphology over 4% are considered as Astenoaspermia. This study was conducted on the effectiveness of mobility on the outcome of pregnancy with IUI among the infertile couples referring to Jahad Daneshgahi infertility center. A number of 215 samples were divided in three groups of mobility over 70% (normospermia), mobility between 50% and 70% (normospermia) and mobility under 50% (astenoaspermia). The sperms were prepared with SU. The studies indicated that on sperm mobility after preparing had significant increase in all groups. Ovarian stimulations were performed based on the international protocol and the prepared suspension sperm was injected slowly into the uterus with Catheter. The results of pregnancy in term of pregnancy rates, abortion rates, and birth rates were evaluated and analyzed statistically. The results indicated that mobility has no contribution in the significant increase of pregnancy outcomes due to intrauterine insemination.
1. Bartoov B., Berkovitz A., Eltes F., Kogosowski A., Menezo Y., Baraky., 2002. Real time fine morphology of motile human sperm cells is associated with IVF-ICSI outcome. Journal of Andrology, 23(1): 1-8.
2. Boomsma C.M., Heineman M.J., Cohlen, B.J., Farquhar C., 2007. Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination (review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (4): CD004507.
3. Cooper T.G., Noonan E., Von E.S., Aguer T., Barker H.W., Behre H.M., Haugen T.B., 2010. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Human Reporduction Update, 16: 231-245.
4. Dorjpurev V., Kuwahara A., Yano Y., Taniguchi T., Yamomato Y., Suto A., Tanaka Y.U., Matsuzaki T., 2011. Effect of semen characteristics on pregnancy rates following IUI. Journal of Medicine Investment, 58(1-2): 127-133.
5. Ghumman S., Adiga S.K., Upadya D., Kalthur G., Jayaraman V., 2011. Combination of swin-up and density gradient separation methods effectively eliminate DNA damaged sperm. Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association, 12(3): 148-152.
6. Hendin B.N., Falcone T., Hallak J., Nelson D.R., Vemullapalli S., Goldberg J., Thomas A.J., Agarwal A., 2000. The effect of patient and semen characteristic on live birth rate following IUI.A retrospective study. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 17(5): 245-262.
7. Hughes E.G., 1997. The effectiveness of ovulation induction and IUI in the treatment persistent infertility a meta-analysis. Human Reproduction, 12(9): 1865-1872.
8. Ihgnait P., Maiti G.D., Pillai A.K., Yadav J., 2013. To compare the effectiveness of Density Gradient Centrifugation and Swin-up Wash Semen prepartion technique on the clinical outcome in Intrauterine Insemination. Journal of Marine Medical Society, 15(2): 91-97.
9. Lemmens L., Kos S., Beijer C., Brinkman J.W., van der Horst F.A., van den Hoven L., Kieslinger D.C., van Trooyen-van Vrouwerff N.J., Wolthuis A., Hendriks J.C., Wetzels A.M., 2016. Predictive value of sperm morphology and progressively motile sperm count for pregnancy outcome on IUI. Fertility and Sterility, 105(6): 1462-1468.
10. Lindheim S.R., Barad D.H., Zinger M., Witt B., Amin H., Cohen B., Fisch H., Barng P., 1996. Abnormal sperm morphology is highly predictive of pregnancy outcome during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 13: 569-572
11. Mai X., Dingle X., Yeenc P., Tao D., 2018. Effects of sperm morphology and total motile spermatozoa number of the rate of pregnancy through artificial insemination. Acta Medica Mediterranea, 43: 553-587
12. Mehrafra M., Nobakhti N., Roshan Z., Dashtdar H., Hosseini A., 2003. The corrrlation between semen paramerts and pregnancy outcome after intrauterine insemination. Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 1(1): 29-33.
13. Natali II., 2011. Artifical insemination in farm animals. Capter, 7.21: 116-122
14. Ombelet W., Vandeput H., Van de putte P.G., Cox A., Janssen M., Jacobs P., Busmans E., Steeno O., Kruger T., 1997. Intauterine insemination after ovarin stimulation with clomiphene citrate: predictive potential of inseminating motile count and sperm morphology. Human Reproduction, 12: 1458-1463.
15- Pasqualtto E.B., Datichj A., Hendin B.N., Falcone T., Thomas A.J., Nelsone D.R., Agarawal A., 1999. Relationship of total motile sperm count and percentage motile sperm on successful pregnancy rates following IUI. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 16(9): 476-482.
16. Rajai F., Nasari S., Javadi M., 2017. Correlation between count and motile of sperm and age of woman with successful in outcome of IUI. Qazvin Journal of Medicine Science, 18: 22-28.
17. Smith S., Hosid S., Scott L., 1997. Use of postseparation sperm parameters to determine the method of choice for sperm preparation for assisted reproductive technology. Fertility and Sterility, 63: 591-97
18. Zhao Y., Vlahos V., Wyncott C., 2004. Impact of semen characteristics of the success of IUI. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 21(5): 143-148.
_||_