Mode of some of barley quantitative inheritance traits in normal irrigation and terminal drought stress conditions using generation mean analysis
Subject Areas : New Finding in Agriculture
S. Nakhjavan
1
(
Ph. D. in Plants Breeding, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch,Tehran, Iran
)
M. R. Bihamta
2
(
Prof., Tehran University, Karaj, Iran
)
F. Darvish
3
(
Prof., Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
)
B. Sorkhi
4
(
Assis. Prof., Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Karaj, Iran
)
M. Zahravi
5
(
Assis. Prof., Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Karaj, Iran
)
Keywords: generation mean analysis, barley, broad and narrow sense heritability, numbers of gene,
Abstract :
In order to study of heritability and gene action of some of quantitative traits of barley in two conditions, normal irrigation and terminal drought, cross was conducted between two genotypes (EM 79-4×1-BC-80628). In this cross EM 79-4 parent was sensitive to drought and the 1-BC-80628 parent was tolerant to drought. The parents with F1, F2, BC1, and BC2 generations produced from crosses were evaluated on field conditions using RCBD with 3 replications. This experiment was carried out in field of cereal breeding unit of Karaj Seed and Plant Improvement Institute during 2005-6 and 2006-7. In this study plant height, spike length, grain yield in plant , weight of 1000 grain ,harvest index, days to heading and days to physiological maturity were measured. Results indicated that mean of squares of generations for all the traits were significant therefore generation mean analysis for all traits was conducted. In normal irrigation conditions on heredity control for more traits except harvest index additive, dominance and epistasis effects were role, but in terminal drought conditions in heredity control for all traits additive, dominance and epistasis effects were rolled. The ranges of broad sense heritability on normal condition between 0.34 to 0.63 and narrow sense heritability between 0.25 to 0.53 but in terminal drought condition this ranges for broad and narrow sense heritability respectively between 0.48 to 0.77 and 0.29 to 0.62 were varied. Average numbers of gene in normal and terminal drought conditions were 1 to 7 and 1 to 3 genes respectively.
1- باقی زاده، ا. 1382. برسی صفات مرتبط با عملکرد در جو از طریق تجزیه به میانگین نسل ها و نشانگر های مولکولی. پایان نامه دکتری اصلاح نباتات دانشگاه تهران.
2- رضایی، ع. و منزوی کرباسی راوری، ب. 1372. بررسی کنترل ژنتیکی شاخص برداشت و عملکرد بیولوژیک در 8 واریته گندم پائیزه به روش تجزیه و تحلیل های دای آلل. مجله علوم کشاورزی ایران، شماره (1) 24 ص 17-7.
3- قنادها، م. ر. 1377. مطالعه نحوه توارث طول دوره کمون چهار رقم گندم نسبت به زنگ زرد. مجله علوم زراعی ایران. جلد شماره 1. ص71-53.
4-Chowdhry, M.A., Rasool, I., khaliq, I., Mahmood, T. and Gilani, M. M. 1999. Genetics of some biometric traits in spring wheat under normal and drought environment.Rachis Newsletter.18(1): 34-39.
5-Eshghi, R. and Akhundova, E. 2010. Inheritance of some important agronomic traits in hulless barley. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology.,Vol.12,No.1,2010.
6-Falconer, D. S. 1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics.3nd ed.Longman press, London.
7-Finlay, K. W. and Wilkinson, G. N. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in plant breeding program.Aust.J.Rgric. Res.14:742-754.
8- Gardner,C. O. 1963. Estimates of genetic Parameters in Cross fertilizing plant and their implication in plant breeding.PP.225-252.In: Hanson,Wid., and Robinson, H. F.(eds.) Statistical Genetic and plant Breeding ,Nat.Acids. Washington.465PP.
9-Hallauer, A. R. and Miranda, J. B. 1982. Quantitative genetic in maize breeding. The Iowa State univ.Press. Ames,Iowa.
10-Hayman, B. I. 1958. The separation of epistatic from additive and dominance variation in generation means. Heredity.12(3):371-390.
11-Khalifa, M. A. 1982. The inheritance of harvest index in barley.Barley Genetics Newsletter, vol.9.II.Reserchnotes PP: 52-54.
12-kularia , R. K. and Sharma, A.K. 2005. Generation mean analysis for yield and its component traits in barley (Hordeum Vulgare l.). Indian journal of Genetics and plant Breeding. 2005. Vole. 65, no. 2, pp:129-130, 8 refs.
13-Lande, R. 1981. The minimum number of genes contributing to quantitative variation between and within populations. Genetics 95: 541-553.
14- Mather, k. 1949. Biometrical Genetics. Mathen.London.364 PP.
15- Mather, K. and Jinks, T. L. 1982. Biometrical Genetics. 3nd ed chapman & Hall. London.396PP.
16- Miller, D. A. and Pikett, R.C. 1954. Inheritance of parent male fertility in Sorghum vulgar pers. Crop Sci.14:1-40.
17-Mulitze, D. k. and Baker, R. J. 1985. Evaluation of biometrical methods for estimation the number of genes 1-effect of sample size. theor. Appl. Genet -69: 553-558.
18-Prakash, V., Saini, D. D. and Singh, R.V.. 2004. Estimation of gene effects for grain yield and its components in barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.). Indian Journal of Genetics and plant Breeding, 2004, vol. 64, no.1, pp.69-70, 5 refs.
19-Prakash, V., Singh. R. V. and Saini, D. D. 2005. Gene action for grain yield and its related traits in barley (Hordeurn Vulgare L.)Crop Improvement, 2005, Vol.32, No.1, PP:40-43,7refs.
20-Redhu, A. S., Singh, R. K. and Luthara O. P. 1986.Genetic analysis of grain yield and its Components in some leaf rust resistance genotypes of wheat.Haryana Agric.uni.J.Res.16(3):228-232.
21-Richards, R. A. 1996. Defining Selection Criteria to improve yield under drought. Plant Growth Regulation.20:157-166.
22- Stuber, C. W., Moll, R. H. 1974. Epistasis in maize (zea mays L.) Crosses among lines Selected for superior inter variety single Cross Performances. Crop Sci.14:314-317.
23-Yadava, B., Tyagi, C. and Singh, D. 1998. Genetics of transgressive segregation for yield and yield components in wheat. Annals of Applied Biology 133(2):227-235.
24-Yadava, R., Maherchandani, N., Singh, M. and Singh, R. 1995. Comparison of the observed and predicted frequencies of transgressive segregates for yield and related traits in two bread wheat populations. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 55(3): 266-272.
