Evaluation forage yield and quality of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) accessions in dryland conditions of Eastern Azerbaijan
Subject Areas : Journal of Plant Ecophysiologyfarid noormand moaied 1 , ali ashraf jafari 2 , Ahmad Razban Haghighi 3 , F. Seiedi 4
1 - master science
2 - Prof., Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands. I.R.Iran.
3 - Researcher. Agriculture and Natural Resources Research Center, West Azarbayejan province, Iran
4 - استادیار، بخش تحقیقات گیاهپزشکی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی آذربایجان شرقی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، تبریز، ایران
Keywords: Correlation, Protein, Plant height, Crude fiber, Early flowering,
Abstract :
In current research, the forage yield and quality of 49 accessions of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) were examined using simple lattice design with 2 replications under dryland farming system during 2005-2007 in the Agriculture Research Station of Khosroshahr -Eastern Azerbaijan. The traits: forage dry matter yield, plant height, growth vigour, flowering date, leaf to stem ratio and quality traits consisted of dry matter digestibility, crude protein, water soluble carbohydrates, crude fiber, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber and total ash were evaluated during 2 years (2006-2007) . The results of combined analysis showed significant differences among accessions and among years. Total means of forage dry matter yield were 5.43 , 4.45 t/ha in years 2 and 3, respectively. The results of correlation analysis among traits indicated that selection for higher forage dry matter yield was produced with earlier flowering, tall plant height and major growth vigour. Considering to negative relationship of forage dry matter yield and quality, from between genotypes with high yield, mostly were selected high the amount of leaf to stem ratio, crude protein, dry matter digestibility, water soluble carbohydrates, and total ash and down amount of crude fiber, acid detergent fiber and neutral detergent fiber. For this purpose the genotypes of Khoramabad, Ghara yonja, Flavarjan, Ghazaghestan and Kordestan with average values of 6.5 – 8.5 t/ha forage dry matter yield were tendered for produced synthetic variety.
جعفری، ع. و ا. گودرزی. 1385. بررسی تنوع ژنتیکی و روابط بین عملکرد، کیفیت و صفات زراعی در 72 جمعیت یونجه چند ساله. فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی تحقیقات ژنتیک و اصلاح گیاهان مرتعی و جنگلی ایران. جلد 14 شماره 4، صفحه 229-215.
جعفری، ع.، م.نصرتی نیگجه و ح. حیدری شریف آبادی. 1382. بررسی عملکرد علوفه، صفات مورفولوژیکی و صفات کیفی در 18 رقم و اکوتیپ یونجه زراعی در شرایط مطلوب و تنش خشکی. فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی تحقیقات ژنتیک و اصلاح گیاهان مرتعی و جنگلی ایران، شماره 11، صفحه 62-53.
رضایی، ع.م. 1372. به نژادی یونجه. مرکز نشر دانشگاهی تهران، 233 صفحه.
رضوی اهری، و. 1380. بررسی تنوع ژنتیکی نشانگرهای پروتئینی درجمعیتهای یونجه وارتباط آنها با صفات زراعی. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشداصلاح نباتات. دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز. 123 صفحه.
زمانیان، م.1383. مقایسه عملکرد علوفه وصفات موروفولوژیکی ارقام شبدر.مجله علوم زراعی ایران. 6: 192-202.
شرفه، م. و ج.اسماعیل زاده. 1367. بررسی مقاومت پنج رقم یونجه به نماتد ساقه درشرایط طبیعی. مجله آفات و بیماری های گیاهی. 56: 21-25.
کریمی، ه. 1376. زراعت واصلاح گیاهان علوفهای. انتشارات دانشگاه تهران. 414 صفحه.
کوچکی، ع. و ع.ریاضی. 1359. مقایسه 6 رقم یونجه از نظر درصد پروتئین، درصد دیواره سلول، قابلیت هضم ماده خشک و قابلیت هضم دیواره سلول. مجله علوم کشاورزی 7: 3-12.
Faraghei, Sh., M.Farshadfar and E.Farshadfar. 2007. Study of chemical composition and nutrition value of perennial Lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) and genetic diversity based on SDS- PAGE marker.Iranian Journal of Rangelands and Forests Plant Breeding and Genetic Research, 15: 196-210.
Gepts, P. and R.Papa. 2003. Possible effects of (trans) gene flow from crops on the genetic diversity from landraces and wild relatives. Environmental Biosafety Research, 2: 89-103
Hanna, W.W.1993. Improving forage quality by breeding, International Crop Science, 1: 671-675.
Hanson, A.A., D. Barens and R.R. Hill.1988. Alfalfa and alfalfa improvement American society of Agronomy Pablication.1084pp.
Hart, R.H., R.B.Piers and C.H.Hanson.1988. Alfalfa yield, specific leaf weight, co2 exchange rate and morphology, Crop Science, 18:469-653.
Jafari, A.A., A.R.Sayed Mohammadiand N.R.Abdi. 2007. Variation in seed yield and yield components in 31 genotypes of wheat grass (Agropyron desertorum) through the analysis of operating. Iranian Journal of angelands and Forests Plant Breeding and Genetic Research, 15: 221-211.
Jafari, A.,V. Connolly, A.Frolich and E.K.Walsh.2003. A note on estimation of quality in perennial ryegrass by near infrared spectroscopy. Irish Journalof Agricultural and Food Research 42:293-299.
Julier, B., CH.Huygh, P.Guy and M.L.Crochemore.2004. Genetic variation in the medicago sativa complex. http://ressourees ciheam. Org/om/pdf/c 18/96605763-pdf.
Julier, B., CH.Huyghe and CH.Ecall. 2000. Within-and among cultivar Genetic variation in alfalfa forage quality, morphology and yield. Crop Sci. 4: 362-365.
Le Singor, C., K.Gallardo, M.J.Prosper, C.Salon, L.Quillien and K.Thompson.2005. Genetic diversity for seed protein composition in medicago trunculata. Plant Genetic Resources. 3: 59-71.
Manly, B. F. J.1994. Multivariate statistical methods. Chapman & Hall London, 215p.
Nematzadeh, Gh and Gh.Kiani. 2010. Plant Breeding (Classic Methods). The first volume.Mazandaran University Press, Sari, Iran, page 153.
Pourfarhad, A., F. Noormand Moaed, S. Aharizad and A.A. Jafari. 2009. Alfalfa ecotype classification groups using analysis of multivariate statistical. Journal of Scientific – Research, 9: 13-1.
Rooney, W.L., D.Z.Skinnerand J.D.Fritz.1997.Combing ability for protein degradability in alfalfa. Crop Sci. 37: 128-131.
Smith, D., W.R. Kehrand M.V.Tesar. 1975. Establishment and management of alfalfa. American Society of Agronomy Madison, USA. 432 PP.
Steel, R.G.D. and J.H.Torrie.1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. A Biometrical Approach, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill Book Company, London, P.633.
Tucak, M., S. Popovic, T. Cupic, V. Spanic and I.Jug. 2011. Phenotypic Diversity of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) Germplasm. Poljoprivreda, 17: 36-41.
_||_