Evaluation the Attitudes of Followers of Monotheistic Religions to the Development of Sustainable Tourism in Isfahan
Subject Areas : Family
Hamid Reza
eshghipour
1
(Ph.D. of Culture and Communication, Imam Reza International University, Tehran, Iran)
ebrahim
fayaz
2
(Associate Professor, Faculty of Social Sciences of Tehran University, Iran)
Abdollah
bicheranlou
3
(Assistant Professor, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, iran)
Keywords: Tourism, Isfahan, sustainable development of tourism, Monotheistic religions,
Abstract :
Tourism has long been the subject of religious and religious teachings in various titles and has been spoken in most religions around the world in terms of travel, journeys, journeys and tours of informative lectures in the form of revelation or myth. In this regard, this research has been carried out in a quantitative manner in order to measure the attitudes of followers of monotheistic religions about sustainable tourism development in Isfahan. the attitudes of followers of monotheistic religions, a questionnaire consisting of 114 questions of 5 choices was made and then This questionnaire, according to the Cochran formula, showed 384 . According to the size of millions of Muslims in Isfahan in comparison with the population of several hundreds to thousands of Christians, Jews and Zoroastrians, the Cochran formula did not count them in statistical sample. Therefore, using the method The logarithmic sample size of 951 was determined to prevent it The probability errors and the accuracy of 980 statistical samples were surveyed. there is a significant difference between "attitudes of followers of monotheistic religions based on the teachings of holy books" and "their religion" on the development of sustainable tourism in Isfahan. In general, the results of regression analysis show that the most suitable model for predicting the development of sustainable tourism for the respondents of "religions to the four monotheistic religions" in Isfahan is the variables: religious, religious, and consequential, which shows that 13.4% The dependent variable variables are explained by the above three variables (independent variables).
_||_
