Factors influencing the release of co2 in Iran (Case study plants)
Subject Areas : Financial Economics
مرجان Daman keshan
1
(عضو هئیت علمی دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی واحدتهران مرکزی)
محسن Nazari
2
(عضو هئیت علمی دانشگاه تهران)
الهام سادات Rezaei
3
(دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد توسعه اقتصادی)
Keywords:
Abstract :
The environmental problems especially climate changes due to significant increase in green housegases,have been a global problem in last few decads. Among the green housegases,carbondioxid(co2 )is the most important. The average co2 emission is increased 607 kg in 1967(1346) to 4977.7 kg in 2003(1382) and 6881.7 kg in 2007(1386)respectively.It shows that co2 emissionrate is 11times.The social costs for deterioration of environmental due to consumption of fossil fules in 2007(1386) in Iran for SPM,CO2 ,SO2 ,NOX,is about 92195 Bilion Iranian Rials which equals to 19.3% of GDP.The CO2 portion has been 39381 Bilion Iranian Rials which is about 9414 Bilion Iranian Rials was emitted by power plants.Therefor ,the factors that affecting co2 emission ,should be studied considering high rate of co2 production in Iran especially by power plants.In this research by means of algebraic decomposition methods the observed changes are analyzed in to five different factors:productioneffect,structural effect, energy intensity effect and ful mix effect.This research has been done for period of 2001-2006(1380-1385) for the Iranian power plants.The research shows that out put effect was the most effect on increasing co2 emissions.And co2 emissions are possible to decrease without decrease out put if structural and efficiency energy and ful mix improves.
- هرامی، محمد حسین، بررسی میزان انتشار هیدروکربن های آروماتیک و آلاینده های so2 ،NO و co در پالایشگاه کرمانشاه، تعیین سهم نقاط انتشار و ارائه راهکارهای بهینه کنترلی،پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات،1386
10- وزات نیرو، "ترازنامه انرژی" سال‌های مختلف
11- Any, B.W., zhang, F.Q., (1999), Inter-regional comparisons of energy-related CO2 emissions using the decomposition Technique, Energy 24, 297-305
12- G.ipekTunk, SerapTurut-Asik, ElifAkbostanci(2009), A decomposition analysis CO2emissions energy use: Turkish case, Energy policy, 37,4689-4699
13- Greening, L.A., (2004), Effects of human behavior on aggregate carbon intensity ofpersonal transportation: comparison of 10 OECD countries for the period 1970-1993, Energy Economics 26(1), 1-30
14- Hea-jinlim, seuhg-Hoonyoo, Seung-junkwak (2000), Industrial CO2 emissions energy use in Korea A structural decomposition analysis, Energy policy 37, 686-698
15- Ilyoung oh, waltherwehrmeyer, YacobMulugetta (in press), Decomposition analysis andMitigation strategies of CO2 emission energy consumption in South Korea, energy policy
16- K. Liaskas, G.Mavrotas, M.Mandaraka, D.Diakoulaki (2000), Decomposition ofindustrial CO2 emissions: the case of European Union, energy economics. 22, 383-394
17- Migvel Angel Tavancon, pablodel Rio, (2007), CO2 emissions and intersectorallinkages.The case of Spain, Energy policy 75, 1100-1116
18- Shyamal Paul, nabindraNath Bhattacharya (2004), a decomposition analysis, Energy policy 32, 585-593
19- Sun, J.W., (1999), Decomposition of aggregate CO2 emissions in the OECD: 1960-1995, The Energy Journal 20. 147-155
20- Zhang, F.Q, Ang B.W. (2001), Methodological issues in cross-
Country decomposition of energy and environment indicators, Energy Economics 23(2), 179-190
21- Zhou, Any B.W. (2008), Decomposition of aggregate CO2 emissions: A production-Theoretical approach, Energy Economics 30, 1054-1064
22-http:/www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol
23-http:/www.clean energy.com
