The supremacy of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice in dealing with cyber aggression

Subject Areas : International Legal Research

Ali reza  Mohaghegh harcheghan ¹ (PhD Student in Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law, Theology and Political Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.)
mohammad  Ardebili ² (Dr. Mohammad Ali Ardebily: Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. (Author))
Ebrahim  Beigzadeh ³ (Professor, Department of International Law, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.)
Mohammad Ali  Mahdavi Sabet ⁴ (Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law, Theology and Political Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.)

Received: 2022-08-01 Accepted : 2023-02-06 Published : 2022-12-22

Keywords: International court of justice, jurisdiction, International Criminal Court, supremacy, cyber-aggression,

Abstract :

Field and Aims: On July 17, 2018, two decades after the adoption of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court activated its jurisdiction over the crime of aggression. This crime was defined in 2010 by the Assembly of States Parties to the Rome Statute (ASP) as a material element of state conduct. "crime of aggression" in a position to effectively control or direct the political or military actions of a State and is in flagrant violation of the Charter of Nations It is considered united. The purpose of this research is to examine the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice in dealing with the crime of aggression, with an emphasis on cyber aggression.Method: This research was analyzed in descriptive-analytical . Findings and Conclusion: Cyber aggression means aggression that has been committed by computer-centered networks. In order to attribute cyber attacks to the government, it is necessary to consider the criterion of effective control. What is meant by effective control is that the government in question has exercised authority to form cyber aggression. The International Criminal Court has two jurisdictional regimes regarding the crime of cyber aggression. The first case is initiated by government referrals or due investigations by the prosecutor, and the second case is initiated by the Security Council referrals. another result of the research shows that the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court in dealing with cyber aggression is superior to the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice.

References:

 

- اردبیلی، محمد علی (1400 ) حقوق جزای عمومی، جلد دوم، چاپ پنجاه و هشتم، تهران، انتشارات بنیاد حقوقی میزان

- اسلون، جیمز.جی و هرناندز، گلیدرآی (1396)، دیوان بین‌المللی دادگستری و توسعه حقوق سازمانی سازمان ملل متحد، چاپ اول، تهران: خرسندی.

- باستانی، برومند (1383). جرائم رایانه‌ای و اینترنتی، تهران: انتشارات بهنامی.

- دارابی‌نیا، مرتضی و فروغی‌نیا، حسین (1394)، رابطه شورای امنیت سازمان ملل متحد با دیوان کیفری بین‌المللی در زمینه‌ی جنایت تجاوز سرزمینی، پژوهشنامه حقوق کیفری، شماره 11.

- دیهیم، علیرضا (1384). درآمدی بر حقوق کیفری بین‌المللی در پرتو اساسنامه دیوان کیفری بین‌المللی، تهران‌: وزارت امور خارجه‌، مرکز چاپ و انتشارات‌.

- سلیمی، صادق (1393)، ارتباط شورای امنیت و دیوان بین‌المللی کیفری در پرتو کنفرانس کامپالا، مجله پژوهش حقوق عمومی، شماره 43

- سلیمی، صادق (1399)، محدودیت‌های دیوان بین المللی در اعمال صلاحیت نسبت به مرتکبین جنایت تجاوز، پژوهش حقوق عمومی، شماره 69

- شایگان‌فرد، مجید (1387)، دیوان بین‌المللی کیفری و صلاحیت رسیدگی به جنایت تجاوز، مطالعات حقوق خصوصی، سال 38، شماره 4.

- عاملی، سعیدرضا (1390). رویکرد قضایی به آسیب‌ها، جرائم و قوانین و سیاست‌های فضای مجازی، چاپ اول، تهران: انتشارات امیرکبیر.

- فروغی، فضل‌الله و عباسی، آسیه (1390)، صلاحیت دیوان کیفری بین‌المللی نسبت به جنایت تجاوز، مطالعات حقوقی، دوره سوم، شماره 2.

- گیوکی، آذر؛ کفایی‌فر، محمدعلی و رضایی، محمدتقی (1400). حملات سایبری و لزوم رعایت اصول اساسی حقوق بشردوستانه در آن‌ها، تحقیقات حقوقی بین‌المللی، دوره 14، شماره 51.

- میرمحمدصادقی، حسین (1395)، دادگاه کیفری بین‌المللی، چاپ نهم، تهران: دادگستر.

- هنجنی، علی و فرهادنیا، سعید (1397). بررسی مسئولیت بین‌المللی دولت‌ها در قبال اعمال گروه‌های تروریستی، تحقیقات حقوقی، شماره 84.

- Ambos, Kai (2016). "Individual Criminal Responsibility for Cyber Aggression", Journal of Conflict & Security Law, Vol .21, No. 3, pp 495-504.

- Blokker, N. (2007). The Crime of Aggression and The United Nations Security Council. Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol 20, pp 867-894.

- Brier, Søren (2010). Cybersemiotics and The question of knowledge. In:nformation and Computation. Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic & Mark Burgin(eds). World Scientific Publishing Co.

- Claus Kreß (2019). On the Activation of icc Jurisdiction over the Crime of Aggression, Queen Mary Studies in International Law, Vol 33, pp. 43-64.

- Crawford, James (2005), Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts 2001, Lauterpacht Research Centre for International Law, University of Cambridge.

- Development, Concepts and Doctrine Center (2022) Cyber Primer, Head Doctrne, 3^rd Edition, Ministry of Defece, P 19

- Eichensehr, K. (2020). The law & politics of cyberattack attribution. UCLA Law Review, 67.

- Goldsmith, Jack (2013). How Cyber Changes the Laws of War, European Journal of International Law, Volume 24, pp 129-138.

- Graham, D. E. (2010). Cyber Threats and the Law of War. Journal of National Security Law and Policy, Vol 4.

- Grigg, D.W (2010). Cyber-Aggression: Definition and Concept of Cyberbullying. Aust. J. Guid. Counsell. Vol 20.

- Hongju Koh, Harold & Buchwald, Todd F (2017). The Crime of Aggression: The United States Perspective, American Journal of International Law, Volume 109, Issue 2, pp. 257 – 295.

- Horowitz, J. (2020). Cyber Operations under International Humanitarian Law: Perspectives from the ICRC. ASIL Insights.

- Kaczorowska, Alina (2015). Public International Law, fifth edition, London: Routledge.

- Madubuike-Ekwe, Joseph N (2021). Cyberattack and the Use of Force in International Law, Beijing Law Review, Vol 12, pp 631-649.

- Michael N Schmitt (2013) fivTallinn Manual on The International Law Applicable To Cyber Warfare1. Cambridge University Press, p.53

- Michael N Schmitt (2017). Tallinn Manual 2.0 on The International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations. Cambridge University Press, pp.82-89

- Miller.Kevin L (2014). The Kampala Compromise and Cyberattacks: Can There Be an International Crime of Cyber-Aggression? Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, vol 23.

- Nguyen, Reese (2013). “Navigating ‘Jus Ad Bellum’ in the Age of Cyber Warfare.” California Law Review 101(4), pp. 1079–1129.

- O’Connell, M. E. and Niyazmatov, M (2012). ‘What is Aggression? Comparing the Jus ad Bellum and the ICC Statute’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, vol 10, pp 189-207.

- Roscini, M. (2010). World Wide Warfare-Jus Ad Bellum and the Use of Cyber Force. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, vol 14, pp 85-130.

- Shaw, M. (2010). International Law (6th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

- Trahan, J (2018), From Kampala to New York—The Final Negotiations to Activate the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over the Crime of Aggression, International Criminal Law Review, Vol 18, pp 197-243.

- Wong, Meagan S (2021), Aggression and State Responsibility at The International Criminal Court, International & Comparative Law Quarterly, vol 70, issue 4.