Implementation of the binding resolutions of the Security Council, with an emphasis on Resolution No. 2231 (JCPOA)
Subject Areas : International Legal ResearchMojtaba Nazif 1 , Alireza Zaheri 2
1 - Assistant Professor, Department of International Law, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. Email: mnazif690@gmail.com
2 - Assistant Professor, Department of International Law, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. (Author). Email: azaheri878@gmail.com
Keywords: Security Council, JCPOA, Resolution 2231, binding resolutions,
Abstract :
Field and Aims: The Security Council, with its political and powerful structure, is one of the pillars of creating and maintaining international order in the current environment. Among the various decisions of this organ, binding resolutions have a special place. Achieving to/ issuing against a chapter seven resolutions is a very powerful motivation among the actors of the international community. But in the final analysis, the way the resolution is implemented in the structure of the international community and the United Nations itself is more important.Method: The present research was conducted using an analytical method.Finding and Conclusion: By examining the practice of the United Nations and especially the practice of the Security Council, it is clear that the implementation of the resolutions of the seventh chapter is highly politicized and affected by the prevailing international atmosphere. Regardless of the impressive impact of these resolutions, experience has shown that in cases where the binding resolution is in conflict with the interests of a permanent member of the Security Council, even assuming the adoption of such a resolution, its implementation by the UN organs seems very unlikel. Resolution 2231, due to the change in the international atmosphere after its adoption, has not been immune from this scourge, and regardless of its binding structure, it seems very weak in the nature of its power to impose obligations and compulsions against the permanent members of the Security Council.
-زرنشان، شهرام. (1392). شکلگیری و شناسایی حقوق بینالملل عرفی. انتشارات گنج دانش.
-سادات میدانی، سیدحسین (1387). صلاحیت قانونگذاری شورای امنیت. دفتر مطالعات سیاسی و بینالمللی.
-شریف، محمد. (1382). بررسی دکترین نامحدود بودن صلاحیت شورای امنیت. انتشارات اطلاعات.
-صالحی، اکرم؛ دهشیری، محمدرضا و حاجی مینه، رحمت. (1398). ماهیت حقوقی- سیاسی خروج آمریکا از برجام. فصلنامه راهبرد سیاسی، 3(9)، 154-133.
-صبور، مسعود و زمانی، سید قاسم. (1399). قطعنامه 2231 شورای امنیت و خروج آمریکا از برجام: از شان نزول ماده 103 منشور ملل متحد تا نزولشان آن. پژوهشهای حقوقی، 19(44)، 36-7.
-فلسفی، هدایت الله. (1369). شورای امنیت و صلح جهانی. تحقیقات حقوقی، (8)، 104-35.
-ملاکریمی، امید؛ جلالی، محمود؛ رئیسی، لیلا. (1396). تحلیل حقوقی « قطعنامه 2231 شورای امنیت» و بررسی رابطه آن با «برجام». مطالعات حقوق عمومی، 47(4)، 1021-995.
-موسی زاده، رضا و کوهی، ابراهیم. (1389). حقوق سازمانهای بینالمللی: شورای امنیت. بنیاد حقوقی میزان.
-نظیف، مجتبی و ظاهری، علیرضا. (1397). نسل جدید موافقتنامههای بینالمللی: برجام. پژوهش حقوق عمومی، 19(58)، 192-165.
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1545067
_||_