Determination of health components and its promotion in Applied Scientific University
Subject Areas : Social Science Quarterly
Manije bahabriyan
1
(
Ph.D. student of Islamic Azad University, Tehran Research Sciences Branch, Department of Educational Management, Tehran, Iran
)
naderqoli qorchiyan
2
(
Assistant Professor of Islamic Azad University, Tehran Science Research Branch, Department of Educational Management, Tehran, Iran
)
Parivash jafari
3
(
Associate Professor, Islamic Azad University, Tehran University of Science Sciences, Tehran, Iran
)
Keywords: Health, Health Components, Health Promotion, Applied Scientific University,
Abstract :
The present study titled Determination of Health Components and its Promotion in Applied Scientific University has been done through a descriptive survey. For this purpose, first we have identified the dimensions and components of health, after assessing the status quo and determining the desirable condition of this university to formulate the framework. Conceptual and executive mechanisms to promote it.The statistical population of this study was 5639 people. A random stratified random sampling from this community, 700 individuals were selected and questioned by a researcher-made questionnaire.To determine the content validity of the questionnaire by reviewing the literature and opinion of the experts, factor analysis was used to determine the formal validity of the test method and the factor analysis was used to calculate the construct validity. On the other hand, Cronbach's alpha showed a reliability of 0.795.The study of dimensions of health and factor load of each of the components indicates that in the dimension of organizational culture and climate, the flexibility component (0.890), in the dimension of employees, the balance of work and life (0.922), in the management and leadership dimension , Planning component (0.890) and organizational structure dimension, control system component (0.924) has the most factor load.Finally, the conceptual model of the research, with 4 dimensions and 19 components and 32 executive tools, was used to assess the status quo and promote the desired situation, and the proportion of each of them was judged by experts.
_||_
