Impact of ambient ozone pollution on yield attributes of Pisum sativum L. plants by using ethylenediurea
Subject Areas : Plant PhysiologyFareeha Jabeen 1 , Shakil Ahmed 2 , Anis Shah 3
1 - Institute of Botany, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
2 - Institute of Botany, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
3 - Institute of Botany, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
Keywords:
Abstract :
Agathokleous, E., A.-C. Mouzaki-Paxinou, C. J. Saitanis, E. Paoletti and W. J. Manning. 2016a. The first toxicological study of the antiozonant and research tool ethylene diurea (EDU) using a Lemna minor L. bioassay: hints to its mode of action. Environmental pollution, 213, 996-1006.
Agathokleous, E., E. Paoletti, C. J. Saitanis, W. J. Manning, C. Shi and T. Koike. 2016b. High doses of ethylene diurea (EDU) are not toxic to willow and act as nitrogen fertilizer. Science of the total environment, 566, 841-850.
Agrawal, S., A. Singh and D. Rathore. 2005. Role of ethylene diurea (EDU) in assessing impact of ozone on Vigna radiata L. plants in a suburban area of Allahabad (India). Chemosphere, 61, (2) 218-228.
Ali, I., A. Rab and S. Hussain. 2002. Screening of pea germplasm for growth, yield and resistance against powdery mildew under the agro-climatic conditions of Peshawar [Pakistan]. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture (Pakistan),
Ashraf, I., M. Pervez, M. Amjad and R. Ahmad. 2011. Effect of varying irrigation frequencies on growth, yield and quality of peas seed. J Agric res, 49, (3) 339-351.
Ashrafuzzaman, M., F. A. Lubna, F. Holtkamp, W. J. Manning, T. Kraska and M. Frei. 2017. Diagnosing ozone stress and differential tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) with ethylenediurea (EDU). Environmental pollution, 230, 339-350.
Astorino, G., I. Margani, P. Tripodo and F. Manes. 1995. The response of Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Lit. to different dosages of the anti-ozonant ethylenediurea (EDU) in relation to chronic treatment with ozone. Plant Science, 111, (2) 237-248.
Avnery, S., D. L. Mauzerall and A. M. Fiore. 2013. Increasing global agricultural production by reducing ozone damages via methane emission controls and ozone‐resistant cultivar selection. Global change biology, 19, (4) 1285-1299.
Baqasi, L. A., H. A. Qari and I. A. Hassan. 2018. Physiological and Biochemical response of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to ambient O3 and the antiozonant chemical ethylenediurea (EDU) in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal, 11, (1) 45-51.
Brunschön-Harti, S., A. Fangmeier and H.-J. Jäger. 1995. Effects of ethylenediurea and ozone on the antioxidative systems in beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Environmental Pollution, 90, (1) 95-103.
Coyle, M., R. Smith and D. Fowler. 2003. An ozone budget for the UK: using measurements from the national ozone monitoring network; measured and modelled meteorological data, and a ‘big-leaf’resistance analogy model of dry deposition. Environmental Pollution, 123, (1) 115-123.
Emberson, L., P. Büker, M. Ashmore, G. Mills, L. Jackson, M. Agrawal, M. Atikuzzaman, S. Cinderby, M. Engardt and C. Jamir. 2009. A comparison of North American and Asian exposure–response data for ozone effects on crop yields. Atmospheric Environment, 43, (12) 1945-1953.
Feng, Z., S. Wang, Z. Szantoi, S. Chen and X. Wang. 2010. Protection of plants from ambient ozone by applications of ethylenediurea (EDU): a meta-analytic review. Environmental Pollution, 158, (10) 3236-3242.
Khan, T. N., A. Ramzan, G. Jillani and T. Mehmood. 2013. Morphological performance of peas (Pisum sativum) genotypes under rainfed conditions of Potowar region. J Agric Res, 51, (1) 51-60.
Mills, G. and H. Harmens. 2011. Ozone pollution: A hidden threat to food security. NERC/Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
Nawab, N. N., G. M. Subhani, K. Mahmood, Q. Shakil and A. Saeed. 2008. Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis studies in garden pea (Pisum sativum L.). Journal of Agricultural Research (Pakistan),
Oksanen, E., V. Pandey, A. Pandey, S. Keski-Saari, S. Kontunen-Soppela and C. Sharma. 2013. Impacts of increasing ozone on Indian plants. Environmental Pollution, 177, 189-200.
Singh, A. A., S. Singh, M. Agrawal and S. B. Agrawal. 2015. Assessment of ethylene diurea-induced protection in plants against ozone phytotoxicity. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 233, 129-184.
Smýkal, P., G. Aubert, J. Burstin, C. J. Coyne, N. T. Ellis, A. J. Flavell, R. Ford, M. Hýbl, J. Macas and P. Neumann. 2012. Pea (Pisum sativum L.) in the genomic era. Agronomy, 2, (2) 74-115.
Tiwari, S., M. Agrawal and W. J. Manning. 2005. Assessing the impact of ambient ozone on growth and productivity of two cultivars of wheat in India using three rates of application of ethylenediurea (EDU). Environmental Pollution, 138, (1) 153-160.
Tonneijck, A. and C. Van Dijk. 1997. Effects of ambient ozone on injury and yield of Phaseolus vulgaris at four rural sites in the Netherlands as assessed by using ethylenediurea (EDU). The New Phytologist, 135, (1) 93-100.
Van Dingenen, R., F. J. Dentener, F. Raes, M. C. Krol, L. Emberson and J. Cofala. 2009. The global impact of ozone on agricultural crop yields under current and future air quality legislation. Atmospheric Environment, 43, (3) 604-618.
Vandermeiren, K., L. De Temmerman and N. Hookham. 1995. Ozone sensitivity of Phaseolus vulgaris in relation to cultivar differences, growth stage and growing