Subject Areas :

یوسف  درویشی ¹ (استادیار گروه جغرافیا ، دانشگاه پیام نور ایران.)
مرضیه  موغلی ² (دانشیار و عضوهیات علمی ، واحد لارستان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، لارستان، ایران.)

Received: 2018-11-04 Accepted : 2020-09-07 Published : 2020-09-22

Keywords:

References:

References

1. Papli Yazdi, Mohammad. Hossein and Mehdi Saghaei (2002), Tradition, Modernity, Reading an Article: Geography consists of human interaction, technology, management and environment. Quarterly Journal of Geographical Research, Vol[In persian]

2. Rowlin, B. (2005), Being aware, the criterion of moral value, in: Bio-environmental ethics, translation: Fatemeh Valiani, Volume 1, Editor: Louis P. Poiman, Tehran: Development Publishing, 432.

3. Abedi Sarvestani, Ahmad and Mansour Shah Vali (2009), The Role of Agricultural Promotion in Promoting Bio-Environmental Ethics of Farmers, Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 120-130. [In persian]

4. Abedi Sarvestani, Ahmad and Mansour Shah Vali (2008), The Necessity and Characteristics of Research in Bio-Environmental Ethics, Quarterly Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, Vol. 3, No. 3 and 4, pp. 56. [In persian]

5. Abedi Sarvestani, Ahmad (2008), Explaining the theory of bio-environmental ethics of students and professors of Shiraz University with the theory of procedures, doctoral dissertation, supervisor, Dr. Mansour Shah Vali, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Shiraz University. [In persian]

6. Abedi Sarvestani, Ahmad, Mansour Shah Vali and Seyed Mostafa Mohaghegh Damad (2007), The Nature and Perspectives of Bio-Environmental Ethics with Emphasis on the Islamic Perspective, Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, Vol. [In persian]

7. Mardia, K, Kent, J, Baby, J, Translation: Mohammad Mehdi Tabatabai (1997), Multivariate Analysis. Tehran: University Publishing Center[In persian]

8. Abaidoo, S. (1997); Human-Nature Interaction and the Modern Agricultural Regime: Agricultural Practices and Environmental Ethics. PhD Dissertation, Dept. of Sociology, University of Saskatchewan, Canada.

9. Abedi-Sarvestani, A. and Shahvali, M. (2008a); Ecology and ethics: Some relationships for nature conservation. Journal of Applied Sciences, 8(4): 715-718.

10. Abedi-Sarvestani, A. and Shahvali, M. (2008b); Environmental ethics: Toward an Islamic perspective. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, 3(1): 609-617.

11. Burton, M. (1972); Semantic dimensions of occupation names. In: R. N. Shepard, A. K. Rommey and S. B. Nerlove (editors), Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications in the Behavioral Sciences (Vol.1). (pp.55-71). New York: Seminar Press.

12. Carroll, J. D and Chang, J. J. (1970); Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of "Eckart-Young" decomposition. Psychometrica, 35: 283-319.

13. Carroll, J. D. (1972); Individual differences and multidimensional scaling. In: R. N. Shepard, A. K. Rommey and S. B. Nerlove (editors), Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications in the Behavioral Sciences (Vol.1). (pp.105-155). New York: Seminar Press.

14. Collins, A. J. (1980); Introduction to Multivariate Analysis. New York: Chapman and Hall.

15. Correa, A. D; Diaz, J. Suarez, E. and Hernandez, B. (1993); Multidimensional scaling reliability in similarity judgments about environmental sentences. Quality & Quantity, 27: 201-209.

16. De Pau la, G. O. and Cavalcant, R. N. (2000); Ethics: Essence for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 8: 109-117.

17. Donald, I. and Cooper, S. (2001); A facet approach to extending the normative component of the theory of reasoned action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40: 599-624.

18. Dunlap, R. E. and Van Liere, K. D. (1978); A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results: The new environmental paradigm. Journal of Environmental Education, 9: 10-19.

19. Garson, G. D. (2007); Multidimensional Scaling. Available at: http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu, Accessed: 15 October. 2007.

20. Hatcher, T. (2004); Environmental ethics as an alternative for evaluation theory in for-profit business contexts. Evaluation and Program Planning, 27: 357-363.

21. Hernandez, B. Suarez, E. Martinez-Torvisco, J. and Hess, S. (2000); The study of environmental beliefs by facet analysis, research in the Canary Islands, Spain. Environment and Behavior, 32(5): 612-636.

22. Kortenkamp, K. V. and Moore, C. F. (2001); Ecocentrism and anthropocentrism: Moral reasoning about ecological commons dilemmas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21: 261-272.

23. Kroemker D. and Mosler, H. J. (2002); Human vulnerability- factors influencing the implementation of prevention and protection measures: an agent based approach. In: K. Steininger and H. Weck-Hannemann (editors), Global Environmental Change in Alpine Regions: Recognition, Impact, Adaptation and Mitigation. (pp.93-112). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

24. Leutner, D. and Weinsier, P. D. (1991); The structure of student interest in computers and information technology: An application of facet theory and multidimensional scaling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26(4): 709-736.

25. Lundrigan, S. and Canter, D. (2001); A multivariate analysis of serial murderers’ disposal site location choice. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21: 423-432.

26. Malhotra, N. K. (1987); Validity and structural reliability of multidimensional scaling. Journal of Marketing Research, 24: 164–173.

27. Maslovaty, N. and Kuzi, E. (2002); Promoting motivational goals through alternative or traditional assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 28: 199-222.

28. Maslovaty, N. Marshall, A. E. and Alkin, M. C. (2001); Teachers' perceptions structured through facet theory: Smallest space analysis versus factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(1): 71-84.

29. Oughton, D. (2003); Protection of the environment from ionizing radiation: Ethical issues. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 66: 3-18.

30. Rodgers, J. L. (1991); Matrix and stimulus sample sizes in the weighted MDS model: Empirical metric recovery functions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15(1): 71-77.

31. Schultz, P.W and Zelezny, L. (1999); Values as predictors of environmental attitudes:Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19: 255- 265.

32. Schultz, P. W; Gouveia, V. V. Cameron, L. D. Tankha, G. Schmuck, P. and Franek, M. (2005); Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4): 457-475.

33. Shye, S. Elizur, D. and Hoffman, M. (1994); Introduction to Facet Theory. London: Sage.

34. Shye, S. (1998); Modern facet theory: Content design and measurement in behavioral research. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 14(2): 160-171.

35. Silva, D. L. (2001); The Buddhist attitude towards nature. In: Pojman L. P. (editor), Environmental Ethics: Readings in Theory and Application (pp. 256-260). London: Thompson and Learning.

36. Simon-Brown, V. (2004); Intelligent consumption: Addressing consumer responsibilities for natural resources and beyond. Journal of Extension, 42(5). Available at: http://www.joe.org/joe/2004august/a1.shtml.

37. Siu, O. L. and Leung, T. W. (1999); A comparative study on value of money among university students in China and Hong Kong: A facet approach. Education Journal, 27(2): 1- 20.

38. Stern, P. and Dietz, T. (1994); The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 56: 121-145.

39. Summers, J. and Mackay, D. B. (1976); On the validity and reliability of direct similarity judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 13: 289-295.

40. Thompson, S. and Barton, M. (1994); Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14: 199–210