Mechanical Behavior of the Copper Matrix Composite Reinforced by Steel Particles
الموضوعات :Vahid Norouzifard 1 , Ashkan Nazari Siahpoush 2 , Amir Talebi 3
1 - Department of Mechanical Engineering, Jundi-shapur University of Technology, Dezful, Iran
2 - Department of Materials and Metallurgy Engineering, Islamic Azad University-Dezful baranch, Dezful, Iran
3 - Faculty of Materials & Manufacturing Technologies, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
الکلمات المفتاحية: Copper, Composite, Fatigue Test, Microstructure, steel particles,
ملخص المقالة :
In this study, the microstructure, tensile, and fatigue behavior of the copper matrix composites reinforced by steel particles are investigated. The composite grades containing 2.5, 5.2, and 7.4 wt% steel particles up to 90 µm in size are manufactured by the casting method. The microstructure of the composite samples is studied by scanning electron microscopy. The tensile and fatigue test samples are prepared and tested based on the ASTM standard. Adding 2.5 wt% steel particles to the copper matrix increases the yield strength, tensile strength, and elongation of the pure copper by about 48, 21, and 4.8%, respectively. The fatigue test results show that reinforcing the pure copper with 2.5 wt% steel particles improves the fatigue life of the pure copper by 67, 31, and 86 percent in 60, 80, and 100 MPa amplitude stresses, respectively. On the other hand, further increasing the reinforcement particle content to 5.2 and 7.4 wt% causes unusual fatigue behavior and adversely affects the mechanical strength of the composite. Therefore, the fatigue life of the composite samples reinforced by more than 5.2 wt% steel particles is not a function of the stress level and does not increase with the decrease of the stress.
[1] S. Fu et al., “Effect of aging process on the microstructure and properties of Cu–Cr–Ti alloy,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, vol. 802, 2021, p. 140598.
[2] X. Gao et al., “Mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of graphene reinforced copper matrix composites,” Powder Technol., vol. 301, 2016, pp. 601–607.
[3] N. Somani, Y. K. Tyagi, P. Kumar, V. Srivastava, and H. Bhowmick, “Enhanced tribological properties of SiC reinforced copper metal matrix composites,” Mater. Res. Express, vol. 6, no. 1, 2018, p. 016549.
[4] R. kumar L and A. K. S, “Corrosion and wear behaviour of nano Al2O3 reinforced copper metal matrix composites synthesized by high energy ball milling,” Part. Sci. Technol., vol. 38, no. 2, 2020, pp. 228–235.
[5] K. K. Alaneme, E. A. Okotete, A. V. Fajemisin, and M. O. Bodunrin, “Applicability of metallic reinforcements for mechanical performance enhancement in metal matrix composites: a review,” Arab J. Basic Appl. Sci., vol. 26, no. 1, 2019, pp. 311–330.
[6] A. Brendel, C. Popescu, H. Schurmann, and H. Bolt, “Interface modification of SiC-fibre/copper matrix composites by applying a titanium interlayer,” Surf. Coatings Technol., vol. 200, no. 1-4, 2005, pp. 161–164.
[7]T. Köck, A. Brendel, and H. Bolt, “Interface reactions between silicon carbide and interlayers in silicon carbide-copper metal-matrix composites,” J. Nucl. Mater., vol. 362, no. 2–3, 2007, pp. 197–201.
[8] M. Abolghasem, A. Rashidi, S. M. Abbasi, and M. Mihanpanah, “Manufacture and mechanical properties study of copper-matrix nanocomposites reinforced with carbon nanotubes by means of powder metallurgy,” emergencias, vol. 6, 2013, pp. 22–27.
[9] G. Shao, P. Liu, K. Zhang, W. Li, X. Chen, and F. Ma, “Mechanical properties of graphene nanoplates reinforced copper matrix composites prepared by electrostatic self-assembly and spark plasma sintering,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, vol. 739, no. August 2018, 2019, pp. 329–334.
[10]C. Salvo, R. V. Mangalaraja, R. Udayabashkar, M. Lopez, and C. Aguilar, “Enhanced mechanical and electrical properties of novel graphene reinforced copper matrix composites,” J. Alloys Compd., vol. 777, 2019, pp. 309–316.
[11] K. Zhang, G. Shao, W. Li, X. Chen, F. Ma, and P. Liu, “Wear and Corrosion Behavior of Graphene-Nanoplate-Reinforced Copper Matrix Composites Prepared Through Electrostatic Self-Assembly,” J. Mater. Eng. Perform., vol. 28, no. 3, 2019, pp. 1650–1660.
[12] N. Vijay Ponraj, A. Azhagurajan, S. C. Vettivel, X. Sahaya Shajan, and P. Y. Nabhiraj, “Study of Processing and Microstructure of Copper Composite Reinforced with Graphene Nanosheet by Powder Metallurgy Technique,” Powder Metall. Met. Ceram., vol. 56, no. 9–10, 2018, pp. 523–534.
[13] K. K. Alaneme and B. U. Odoni, “Mechanical properties, wear and corrosion behavior of copper matrix composites reinforced with steel machining chips,” Eng. Sci. Technol. an Int. J., vol. 19, no. 3, 2016, pp. 1593–1599.
[14] S. Cardinal, J. M. Pelletier, G. Q. Xie, F. Mercier, and F. Dalmas, “Enhanced compressive plasticity in a Cu-Zr-Al – Based metallic glass composite,” J. Alloys Compd., vol. 782, 2019, pp. 59–68.
[15] J. Chen et al., “Fabrication and mechanical properties of AlCoNiCrFe high-entropy alloy particle reinforced Cu matrix composites,” J. Alloys Compd., vol. 649, 2015, pp. 630–634.
[16] V. Norouzifard, H. Naeinzadeh, and A. Talebi, “Fabrication and investigation of mechanical properties of copper matrix nanocomposite reinforced by steel particle,” J. Alloys Compd., vol. 887, 2021, p. 161434.
[17] Annual Book of ASTM Standards. E 466, 2016.
[18] Annual Book of ASTM Standards. E8/E8M, 2016.
[19] G. H. A. Bagheri, “The effect of reinforcement percentages on properties of copper matrix composites reinforced with TiC particles,” J. Alloys Compd., vol. 676, 2016, pp. 120–126.
[20] D. Hull, Fractography: Observing, Measuring and Interpreting the Fracture Surface Topography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
[21] H. ASM, Volume 12: fractography. ASM international, 1987.
[22] A. Echeverría and J. M. Rodriguez-Ibabe, “The role of grain size in brittle particle induced fracture of steels,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, vol. 346, no. 1–2, 2003, pp. 149–158.
[23] N. Chawla and K. K. Chawla, Metal Matrix Composites. Springer, 2006.
