A Study on the Social Factors Influencing Scientific Papers Presentations among PhD Candidates at IAU of Babol
الموضوعات :
Manouchehr Pahlavan
1
(Department of Sociology, Babol Branch, Islamic Azad University, Babol, Iran)
Hoda Rezaei Roshan
2
(Department of Sociology, Babol Branch, Islamic Azad University, Babol, Iran)
Seyyedeh Hedyeh Hosseini
3
(Department of Sociology, Ministry of Education, Amol, Iran)
الکلمات المفتاحية: Regression, age, gender, marital status, Social Factors, Babol, IAU, Scientific papers,
ملخص المقالة :
The purpose of the present paper was to pursue the social factors involving in scientific papers and also examine the impact of tendency of PhD candidates to participate in research projects, membership and activity of PhD candidate at conferences, the willingness in scientific collaboration of professors and researchers. The sample size consisted of 92 PhD candidates at Islamic Azad University (IAU) of Babol branch in 2016. Furthermore, based on the present research findings, the regression effect indicated the independent variables had a significant effect on presenting scientific papers. Also the Chi-square test showed that there was no significant relationship among age, marital status, gender and presenting scientific paper. But there was significant relationship between the occupation and presentation of scientific papers. Finally, the active PhD candidates who prepared scientific paper among the age group of 26-36 years.
Abramo, G., Cicero, T., & Dangelo, C. A. (2015). Should the research performance of scientists be distinguished by gender? Journal of informetrics, 9 (1), 25–38.
2. Charyton, C., Elliott, J. O., Rahman, M. A., Woodard, J. L., & DeDios, S. (2011). Gender and science: Women nobel laureates. The Journal of creative behavior,45(3), 203–214.
3. Isfandyari-Moghaddam, A., Hasanzadeh, M., & Ghayoori, Z. (2012). A study of factors affecting research productivity of Iranian women in ISI. Scientometrics, 91(1), 159–172.
4. Kreiman, G., Maunsell, J. (2011). Nine criteria for measuring scientific output, front computneurosci, Vol. 5, No. 48, doi: 10.3389/fncom.2011.00048.
5. Perlin, M., Santos, A., Imasato, T. Borenstein, D., Silva, S. (2017). The Brazilian scientific output published in journals: A study based on a large CV database. Journal of Informetrics, 11, pp. 18-31.
6. Prpi, K. (2002). Gender and productivity differentials in the science. Scientometrics, 55(1), 27–58.
7. Rabani, R., Rabani, A. (2011). Presenting a sociological model to enhance the scientific output in scientific communities (case study: Isfahan University), Journal of higher education in Iran, 4(2), pp. 65-98.
8. Van Arensbergen, P., Van der Weijden, I., Van den Besselaar, P. (2012). Gender differences in scientific productivity: A persistent phenomenon? Scientometrics, 93(3), 857–868.
9. Tuesta, E. Delgado KV., Mugnaini, R., Digiampietri, LA., Mena-Chalco, JP, Pérez, J. (2015). Analysis of an advisor–advisee relationship: An exploratory study of the area of exact and earth sciences in Brazil. PloS One 10(5), e0129065.
10. Borrego, A., Barrios, M. Villarroya, A., Olle, C. (2010). Scientific output and impact of postdoctoral scientists: a gender perspective, Scientometrics, 83(1), pp 93–101.
