Involvement Load of Vocabulary Tasks IELTS preparation Vocabulary Course Books
الموضوعات : نشریه مطالعات آموزش زبان انگلیسی
Maryam Sadeghi Garmaroudi
1
(
English Language Teaching, Payame noor University, Tehran
)
Mohammad Aghajanzadeh
2
(
English Language Department, Payame Noor University, Rasht, Gilan, Iran
)
الکلمات المفتاحية: strategies, involvement Load Hypothesis- Involvement Load Index- Vocabulary Learning,
ملخص المقالة :
The importance of vocabulary is undeniable. EFL learners need sufficient lexicon in order to bea competitive speaker. Lots of strategies have been proposed. The concept of involvement loadwas first introduced by Hulstijn and Laufer (2001). They believed that deeper explanation oflexical information will result in better retention of them. The present study aimed at finding theinvolvement load indexes of vocabulary tasks used in two popular IELTS vocabulary books. Italso intended to find the most applied vocabulary learning strategies by IELTS learners. Datawere gathered from the intensive analysis of 20 selected task of “Oxford Word Skills” and“Advanced Vocabulary In Use”. Also 50 IELTS candidates were asked to fill a questionnaire.The results showed that books applied a variety of activities. The maximum index was 4 and theminimum was 1. The analysis showed that consolidating was used for the tasks with higherinvolvement load indexes. Tasks with lower involvement load indexes had other strategies likediscovery. Data analysis revealed that learners implied different strategies in learningvocabularies. The most popular strategy was germane to determination strategies, which areclustered under discovery Strategy.
Aebersold, J. A. Field, M. (1997). From reader to reading teacher: issues and strategies
for second language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Adler, N.(1991). Communicating across Cultural Barriers. International Dimensions of
OganizationalBehavior.Retieved from
https://global.duke.edu/sites/default/files/images/NancyAdlerCrossCultComm..pdf
Asgari, A & Bin Mustapha, G. (2011). The Type of Vocabulary Learning Strategies Used
by ESL Students in University Putra Malaysia. English Language Teaching, 4, 2,
84-90
JOURNAL OF TEACHING ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES, Vol. 7, NO. 2, fall 2018
52
Baleghizadeh,S.,& Abbasi,M.(2013). The Effect of Four Different Types of Involvement
Indices on Vocabulary Learning and Retention of EFL Learners. The Journal of
Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 5, 2, 1-26.
Bastanfar, A., & Hashemi, T. (2010). Vocabulary learning strategies and ELT materials:
A study of the extent to which VLS research informs local course books in Iran.
International Education Studies Vol. 3, 3 / Retrieved on 14th January 2014 from
http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ies/article/view/5493/5299.
Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Cho, K.S.,& Krashen, S (1994). ‘Acquisition of vocabulary from the Sweet Valley Kids
Series: adult ESL acquisition’. Journal of Reading, 37: 662–7
Craik, F.,& Lockhart. R( 1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour ,11(3): 671-684.
Decarrico, J. S. (2001). Vocabulary learning and teaching. Teaching English as a second
or foreign language, 3, 285-299.
Ellis, R., Y., Tanaka . A.,& Yamazaki. (1994). “Classroom interaction, comprehension,
and the acquisition of L2 word meanings”. Language Learning, 44, 449-491.
Fatalaki, J.(2014). Involvement Load Hypothesis: Word Meaning Retention across Oral
and Written Task Types. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences,
37, 29-45.
Ghorbani, M.,& Rahmandoost,M. (2012). Higher Task-induced Involvement Load
Enhances Students' EFL Vocabulary Learning. Journal of Language Teaching
and Research, 3, 6, 1203-1210.
Griffiths,C.(2004). Language Learning Strategies: Theory and Research. Occasional
Paper ,1,1-26.
Hulstijn, J. H. (1992). Retention of inferred and given word meanings: Experiments in
incidental learning. In. P. J. Arnaud & H. B’joint (Eds.), Vocabulary and Applied
Linguistics. London: Macmillan, 113-125.
Hulstijn, J., Hollander, M.,& Greidanus. T. (1996). Incidental vocabulary learning by
advanced foreign. language students: the influence of marginal glosses, dictionary
use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 327-
339. Retrieved from: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-
4781.1996.tb01614.x/full.
Intaraprasert, C. (2004). EST students and vocabulary learning strategies: A preliminary
investigation. Unpublished research, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon
Ratchasima, Thailand. Retrieved from :
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042813026426
Jing, L.,& Jianbin, H. (2009). An Empirical Study of the Involvement Load Hypothesis
in Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition in EFL Listening. Polyglossia , 16,1,11.
Krashen, S. D.,& Terrell, T. D. (2000). The natural approach: Language acquisition in
the classroom. New York: Longman.
Kulikova, O. (2015) .Vocabulary learning strategies and beliefs about vocabulary
learning: a study of beginning university students of Russian in the United States.
Iowa Research Online . Retrieved from : http://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/1868.
Laufer, B.,& Hulstijn, J. (2001) Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language:
The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22 (1): 1-26.
Mármol, G.,& Sánchez, A. (2013). The Involvement Load Hypothesis: It’s Effect on
Vocabulary Learning in Primary Education. RESLA, 26, 11-24.
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Shoari,E. Davatgari Asl, M. (2015). The Effect of Drawing Relevant Pictures on Iranian
Young EFL Learners’ L2 Vocabulary Performance. Journal of Applied Linguistics
and Language Research, 2(7), 196-210.
Siriwan ,M.(2007). english vocabulary learning strategies employed by rajabhat
university students. Unpublished thesis. Retrieved from
http://sutir.sut.ac.th:8080/sutir/bitstream/123456789/284/1/mayuree_fulltext.pdf
Thornbury, S. (2002). How to Teach Vocabulary. Harlow: Longman.
Yaqubi, B., Rayati, R.,& Allemzade Gorg, N. (2010). The Involvement Load Hypothesis
and Vocabulary Learning: The Effect of Task Types and Involvement Index on L2
Vocabulary Acquisition. JTLS, 2(1), 1-19.
