Inefficiency of legal laws in applying to damages caused by artificial intelligence
الموضوعات : journal of Artificial Intelligence in Electrical Engineering
Ehsan Lame
1
(MA in International Trade Law, Pardis Branch of Islamic Azad University)
Zohre Roozbahani
2
(IT Engineering, University of Applied Science and Technology Informatics of Iran)
ahmad rouzbahani
3
(Msc in software engineering, Azad University of South Tehran)
shahriar eslamitabar
4
(Faculty Member of Smart University of Medical Sciences)
الکلمات المفتاحية: "ethics", "legal personality", "artificial intelligence", "civil responsibility",
ملخص المقالة :
The emergence and increasing progress of artificial intelligence has faced the legal science with unsolvable challenges. Artificial intelligence systems, like other new technologies, have faced serious challenges to the principle of accountability and legal rules about civil responsibilities (compensation for damages caused by artificial intelligence systems). This is an important issue that ensures the confidence of potential victims of these systems and trust in the artificial intelligence industry. In the face of changes in smart technology, the courts experience challenges in applying traditional laws that the current laws are unable to respond to, and regulatory organizations and legislators must pay attention to the fact that the current laws are not responsive in monitoring artificial intelligence and exercising legal responsibilities. They need to pay attention to the special and new law. But the important issue that the legislators in all legal systems are concerned with is whether artificial intelligence is considered a legal entity or not, and whether artificial intelligence can be tried, which has not yet been answered. This article, while reviewing the nature and elements of artificial intelligence, which it is necessary for lawyers and lawyers to know, examines the various aspects of the challenges facing the science of law in the field of artificial intelligence and examines the ineffectiveness of the laws governing the damages caused by artificial intelligence. The result is that the rules of audience need to be revised in dealing with the responsibilities arising from artificial intelligence.
