Presenting a Conceptual Framework in the Entrepreneurial Strategic Factors of Government Managers (Managers of Isfahan Province)

الموضوعات :

Mahnaz Ghasemi Hosseinabadi ¹ , Morteza MousaKhani ² , Majid Ramezan ³

1 - Ph.D Candidate of Public Administration, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Professor, Department of Public Administration, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
3 - Associate Professor, Department of Human Resources, Malik Ashtar University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

تاريخ الإرسال : 07 الثلاثاء , ربيع الثاني, 1444 تاريخ التأكيد : 05 الخميس , جمادى الثانية, 1444 تاريخ الإصدار : 10 السبت , رمضان, 1444

الکلمات المفتاحية: conceptual framework, Isfahan, managers of government organizations, Strategic Factors, innovation, entrepreneurship,

ملخص المقالة :

Enthusiasm is one of the main psychological variables affecting the entrepreneurial intention of people, which as one of the dimensions of well-being in the work environment, expresses a positive and active feeling, which is known with a high level of work with interest and honor. The aim of the present research is to investigate the role of the entrepreneurial enthusiasm of managers in the organizational structure of managers of government organizations. According to the existing theoretical frameworks, the relationships between research variables have been evaluated by some quantitative methods. According to the characteristics of the statistical society, the non-probability and accessible sampling method was chosen for the experts. To determine convergent and divergent validity, Lisrel software was used, and for data analysis, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was usually used to test the normality of the data. The analysis of the obtained data showed that; GFI (normalized fit index) higher than 0.9 is a sign of a good fit of the model. RMSEA is equal to 0.055 (the root mean square of the error of approximation or the deviation test of each degree of freedom) and a value less than 0.08 indicates a good fit of the model. Shows, On the other hand, the P-value (significant level) is 0.0001, which is less than 0.05, so it is accepted with 95% confidence of the conceptual model of entrepreneurial enthusiasm of managers of public organizations. The results showed that the investigation of the entrepreneurial enthusiasm of managers of public organizations in Isfahan province showed factors such as organization atmosphere, perspective, and upstream documents, knowledge management in the organization, efficient human resources, and entrepreneurial culture in the organization, organizational learning, and entrepreneurial education. There is a desire for entrepreneurship in this.

المصادر:

1. Alvandi, A., Rahmaty, M., & Hosseini, S. (2022). Presenting a Development Model of Sport Entrepreneurship in the Professional Clubs of Premier Football League: A Mixed Approach. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 15(2), 203-221. Doi: 22059/jed.2022.329594.653784


2. Aminova, M., Mareef, S., & Machado, C. (2020). Entrepreneurship Ecosystem in Arab World: the status quo, impediments and the ways forward. International Journal of Business Ethics and Governance, 3 (3), 1-13. Doi: 51325/ijbeg.v3i3.37


3. Baum, R., & Locke, A. (2017). The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. Journal of applied psychology, 89(4), 587-598. Doi:1037/0021-9010.89.4.587


4. Bruton, G., Sutter, C., & Lenz, K. (2021). Economic inequality–Is entrepreneurship the cause or the solution? A review and research agenda for emerging economies. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(3), 143-160. org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106095


5. Dvoulety, O. (2021). Entrepreneurship during the times of COVID-19 pandemic: challenges and consequences. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 13(4), 489-506. Doi:10.1108/JEEE-09-2021-461


6. Hamdan, A., Ghura, H., Alareeni, B., & Hamdan, R. (2021). Entrepreneurship Growth in Emerging Economies: New Insights and Approaches. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 12(1), 1-14. org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1944750


7. Hardie, B., Highfield, C., & Lee, K. (2020). Entrepreneurship education today for students’ unknown futures. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4(3), 401- 417.


8. Herest, E., Carpenter, M., & Rapson, L. (2019). Emotional contagion as a precursor to collective emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


9. Ho, T., Wong, S., & Lee, H. (2020). A tale of passion: Linking job passion and cognitive engagement to employee work performance. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1), 26-47.


10. Karimi, M., Namamian, F., Vafaei, F., & Moradi, A. (2019). Using Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods for Evaluation the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Indicators. Journal of System Management, 5(4), 67-76. 20.1001.1.23222301.2019.5.1.7.8


11. Kouseh Gharravi, S., & Saffarian Hamedani, S. (2019). A Presentation of the Strategic Entrepreneurial Marketing Model in the Construction Industry. Journal of System Management, 5(1), 139-170. 20.1001.1.23222301.2019.5.1.7.8


12. Kuckertz, A., Berger, S., & Prochotta, A. (2020). Misperception of entrepreneurship and its consequences for the perception of entrepreneurial failure–the German case. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(8), 1865-1885. org/10.1108/IJEBR-02-2020-0060


13. Li, P., Li, B., Ziyang, L. (2021). The Impact of Entrepreneurship Perceptions on Entrepreneurial Intention during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Frontiers in Educational, 6(14), 361- 379. org/10.3389/feduc.2021.770710


14. Mostafazadeh, F., & Haghighat Monfared, J. (2021). Social Entrepreneurship Development Model in the Higher Education System. Journal of System Management, 6(4), 243-267. Doi: 30495/jsm.2021.680464


15. Nave, E. (2022). A systematic international entrepreneurship review and future research agenda. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 29(3), 15-32. org/10.1108/CCSM-11-2021-0204


16. Neck, H. (2019). Entrepreneurship: The Practice and Mindset. London: SAGE.


17. Osadolor, V., Emmanuel, K., Ejikeme, A., Taiwo, O. (2021). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention: The mediating role of the need for independence. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management, and Innovation, 17(4), 91-119. Doi: https://doi.org/10.7341/20211744


18. Sahiti, F. (2021). Institutions and entrepreneurial activity: a comparative analysis of Kosovo and other economies. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 10(1), 98-119. org/10.1108/JEPP-08-2020-0056


19. Rego, A. (2020). Does the need to belong moderate the relationship between perceptions of spirit of camaraderie and employees happiness? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(2), 148-164. Doi: 10.1037/a0014767


20. Russell, T. (2022). Integration intrapreneurship: implementing innovation in a public healthcare organization. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 11(50), 416-430. Doi: 10.1186/s13731-022-00248-x


21. Urbano, D., Aparicio, S., & Audretsch, D. (2019). Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned? Small Business Economics, 53(1), 21-49. org/10.1007/s11187-018-0038-0


22. Xie, X., Li, L., & Zhou, G. (2022). Economic inequality and entrepreneurship: Micro-evidence from China. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 14(2), 88-104. org/10.1002/sej.1441


23. Ziyae, B., & Sadeghi, H. (2020). Exploring the relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: the mediating effect of strategic entrepreneurship. Baltic Journal of Management, 17(6), 1-17. org/10.1108/BJM-04-2020-0124