A Comprehensive Model for the Assignment of Unfinished Development Projects with their Economic Approach: Qualitative Study
الموضوعات :
Hassan Ali Mohammadi
1
(Department of Industrial Management, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)
Mohammad Ghasemi
2
(Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran)
Kaveh Khalili Damghani
3
(Department of Industrial Management, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)
Gholamreza Hashemzadeh
4
(Department of Industrial Management, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)
الکلمات المفتاحية: Public-Private Partnership, Unfinished Construction Projects, Assignment, Economicization,
ملخص المقالة :
The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive model for the assignment of unfinished construction projects with their economicization approach. This research was conducted qualitatively with the data theory of the foundation. For this purpose, a researcher with 26 experts and specialists in the fields of Management and Planning Organization, the Majlis Research Center and the provincial civil affairs department coordination that purposive sampling (snowball) were interviewed. The text of the interviews was uploaded in MAXQDA10 software and then open coded using the software. After extracting the codes, the main categories were extracted using axial coding. Then, by discovering the relationship between the central categories, and then by performing selective coding and identifying the central category, the desired model based on data theory is presented as a paradigm. The results of data analysis in the form of a template are: Underlying conditions (classification of unfinished construction projects, their economization and assignment of unfinished construction projects), causal conditions (the first step is to control and limit the approval of new projects, the next step is to classify and present a schedule, economic For all incomplete development projects and transfers based on the existing legal instruments of transfers and participation), intervention conditions (lack of proper use of the capacities of existing laws and failure to specify the general policy law of the forty-fourth principle in the transfer of projects, lack of Effective entry of the Privatization Organization due to the difficulties of assigning development projects to companies, lack of accurate information on development projects of state-owned companies and provincial projects, between the systemic nature of the issue and the unclear method of pricing projects), strategies (codification of legal prerequisites, preparation of regulations and systems related to the transfer, preparation of a list of the most probable cases of transferable projects, coordination of responsible bodies due to the inter-institutional nature of the issue and determination of prices through auctions, negotiations, etc. Depending on the application of each method) and the outcome (creating sufficient motivation for managers, operators and current stakeholders of projects and projects by creating a method of returning the saved resources from investment with the participation of the private sector, aggregation and refinement A set of relevant and effective regulations and the availability of all laws and regulations governing private sector investment in development projects, the dissemination of information on all projects in the electronic system and public access to all investable applications as well as contract terms and all subsequent contract developments. The entire duration of the construction, operation or transfer, full transparency of the transfer process to reduce rent-seeking behaviors and pave the way for private sector activity).
Abu Hamza, Dariush. (2014) Organizing development projects (presenting an initial model) , Tehran: Islamic Consultative Assembly Research Center.
Ahsan, K. , Gunawan, I. , 2010. Analysis of cost and schedule performance of international development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 28 (2010) 68–78.
Cabinet of Ministers. (2004) National Land Management Criteria-Approval Letter 41279 T 31611 AH, Tehran: Management and Planning Organization.
Crawford L, Pollack J. 2004. Hard and soft projects: a framework for analysis. Int J Project Manage: 22: 645–53.
Country Management and Planning Organization. (1393) framework agreement public participation-Private “, Tehran.
Faqih Nasiri, Marjan et al. (2008 Development Planning; Principles, Concepts and Comparative Study of the Experience of Selected Countries and Iran (Vol. I), Tehran: Deputy of Planning and Economic Affairs of the Ministry of Commerce.
Flyvbjerg, B. , 2005. Policy and Planning for Large Infrastructure Projects: Problems, Causes, Cures. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3781.
Hallaj Neyshabouri et al. (1396). “(Assignment of development projects “ Current situation, obstacles and solutions “)”, Tehran: Islamic Consultative Assembly Research Center.
Ika L. A. , Hodgson D. , 2014. Learning from international development projects: Blending Critical Project Studies and Critical Development Studies, International Journal of Project Management, accepted 14 January 2014.
Ika, L. A. , 2012. Project management for development in Africa: why projects are failing and what can be done about it. Proj. Manag. J. 43 (4), 27–41.
Jalali Mousavi, Atefeh (1393) ». Review of the budget bill of 1392 for the whole country 57. Determining the task of semi-finished development projects “, Tehran: Islamic Consultative Assembly Research Center.
Khang, D. B. , Moe, T. L. , 2008. Success criteria and factors for international development projects: a life-cycle-based framework. Proj. Manag. J. 39 (1), 72–84.
Kim, J. H. , N. Biletska, and M. Darcy. 2015. “Public Investment Management for Public Private Partnership: Analytical Framework and Assessment Tool. “ Unpublished paper,World Bank, Washington, DC.
Li, Q. , Zhang, Y. H. , Zhang, J. , 2009. Practice and enlightenment of coordinated development between and rural areas in foreign countries. World Agric. 6, 25e28.
Mankiw G. , Romer D. , and Weil D. , 1992, “A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth”. , Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 107, No. 2, (May 1992), pp. 407-437.
Mardi, Mohammad (1393) ». Comparative study of other countries' experience in organizing development projects in Turkey “, Tehran: Islamic Consultative Assembly Research Center.
Miller R. , Lessard D. , 2000. The Strategic Management of Large Engineering Projects, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Rajaram, A. , T. M. Le, N. Biletska, and J. Brumby. 2010. “A Diagnostic Framework for Assessing Public Investment Management. “ Policy Research Working Paper 5397, World Bank, Washington, DC.
Rajaram, A. , T. M. Le, K. Kaiser, J. H. Kim, and J. Frank, eds. 2014. The Power of Public Investment Management: Transforming Resources into Assets for Growth. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Tavakoli, Ahmad (Autumn). (2007 What to do with unfinished construction projects “, Tehran: Journal of Economic Research, No. 26-29.
Yu J. , Leung M. , (2015). Exploring factors of preparing public engagement for large-scale development projects via a focus group study, International Journal of Project Management.
Zolaikhaei and Radfar.2020 “A System Model for Technological Capabilities Assessment in High-speed Train Industries“. , Journal of System Management, Volume 6, Issue 3, Autumn 2020, Pages 101-138.
