Evaluation of Monetary and Fiscal Policy Based on New Keynesian Dynamic General Equilibrium Model in Iran’s Economy

الموضوعات :

Maryam Sharifnezhad ¹ , Sadegh Bakhtiari Koohsorkhi ² , Sara Ghobadi ³

1 - Department of Economics, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2 - Department of Economics, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
3 - Department of Economics, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

تاريخ الإرسال : 29 السبت , شعبان, 1440 تاريخ التأكيد : 01 الإثنين , صفر, 1441 تاريخ الإصدار : 10 الأربعاء , ذو القعدة, 1441

الکلمات المفتاحية: Monetary and Fiscal policy, Generalized Methods of Moments, New Keynesian,

ملخص المقالة :

This paper examines monetary and fiscal policy through the estimation of a New-Keynesian dynamic general equilibrium model for Iran’s economy. In this New-Keynesian dynamic general equilibrium model, the consumers encounter the liquidity constraint and the firms face sticky prices, while they are changing them. In the model presented, a role is considered for both government spending and taxation, besides the monetary rule. Then, the model is estimated using Iran's data over the period of 2002-2017, through the method of generalized moments which leads into valuable insight. The results indicate that aggregate demand reacts to changes in interest rates. When inflation occurs, regardless of its source, it is persistent and inertia.The monetary policy has a forward-looking behavior. The output gap with a lag has a negative effect on government spending and the short-term impact of the output gap on government spending is smaller than its impact on taxation (Tax responses to the output gap are stronger and positive).

المصادر:

[1] Gali, J., L opez-Salido, D., Valles, J., Technology shocks and monetary policy: Assessing the Fed’s performance, Journal of Monetary Economics, 2003, 50, P. 723–743. Doi: 10.1016/S0304-3932 (03)00037-0

 

[2] Gali, J., Gertler, M., Lopez-Salido, D., European inflation dynamics, European Economic Review, 2001, 45(7), P. 1237–1270. Doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921 (00)00105-7

 

[3] Dixit, A., Lambertini, L., Monetary–fiscal policy interactions and commitment versus discretion in a monetary union, European Economic Review, 2001, 45(4–6), P.977–987. Doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00134-9

 

[4] Buti, M., Roeger, W., In’t, V., Stabilizing output and inflation in EMU: Policy conflicts and cooperation under the stability pact, Journal of Common Market Studies, 2001, 39(5), P.801–828. Doi: 10.1111/1468-5965.00332

 

[5] Melitz, J., Some cross-country evidence about debt, deficits, and the behaviour of monetary and fiscal authorities, CEPR Discussion Papers, 1997.

 

[6] Muscatelli, VA., Tirelli, P., Trecroci, C., 10 Monetary and fiscal policy interactions over the cycle: some empirical evidence. Monetary Policy, Fiscal Policies and Labour Markets: Macroeconomic Policymaking in the EMU, 2004. P. 256.

 

[7] Smets, F.,Wouters, R. ,An Estimated Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model of the Euro Area, Journal of the European Economic Association, 2003, 1(5), P. 1123-75. Doi: 10.1162/154247603770383415

 

[8] Peiris, SJ., Saxegaard, M., an Estimated DSGEModel for Monetary Policy Analysis in Low-Income Countries, International Monetary Fund; 2007, Dec 1

 

[9] Resende, C., Rebei, N., ,Estimating the Degree of Fiscal Dominance in a DSGE Model with Sticky Prices and Non-Zero Trend Inflation, International Department Bank of Canada, 2008, Mar 4.

 

[10] Moshiri, S., Bagheri Pormehr,SH., Mousavy nik,H.,Surveying Degree of Fiscal Dominance in Iran’s Economy in a General Equilibrium Dynamic Stochastic Model, Quarterly Journal of Economic Growth and Development Research, 2012, 2(5), P.69-90.

 

[11] Zarra Nezhad, M., Anvari, E. Designing Optimum Monetary and Fiscal Policies of Iran Under Uncertainty in Micro-Founded Macroeconomic Model, Quarterly Economics and Regional Development (Knowledge and Development), 2012, 3, P.1-27.

 

[12] Komijani, A., Tavakolian, H., Monetary Policy under Fiscal Dominance and Implicit Inflation Target in Iran: A Dsge Approach, Journal of Economic Modeling Research, 2012, 2(8), P.86-118.

 

[13] Khiabani, N., Amiri, H., The Position of Monetary and fiscal Policies with emphasizing on Oil Sector with DSGE Models (the case of Iran), Economic Research, 2014, 14(54), P. 133-173.

 

[14] Eslamloueyan, k., Yazdanpanah, z., The Existence of a Risk-Taking Channel of Monetary Policy Transmission in Iran’s Banking System, Journal of Economic Modeling Research, 2018, 8(31), P. 7-40.

 

[15] Izadkhasti, H., Analyzing the Impact of Monetary Policy in a Dynamic General Equilibrium Model: Money in Utility Function Approach, Journal of Economic Modeling Research, 2018, 8(31), P. 72-101.         

 

[16] Gali, J., The New Keynesian Approach to Monetary Policy Analysis: Lessons and New Directions, The scienc and practice of monetary policy today, 2010, P. 9-19. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-02953-0_2

 

[17] Gali, J., The State of New Keynesian Economics: A Partial Assessment, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2018, 32(3), P .87-112. Doi: 10.3386/w24845

 

[18] Walsh, C. Monetary theory and policy. 2010, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

 

[19] Paez-Farrell, J., Monetary policy rules in theory and in practice: evidence from the UK and the US, Applied Economics, 2009, 41(16), P. 2037-46. Doi: 10.1080/00036840701689496

 

[20] Muscatelli, VA., Tirelli, P., Trecroci, C. The Interaction of Fiscal and Monetary Policies: Empirical evidence and optimal policy using a structural New-Keynesian model, Journal of Macroeconomics, 2004, 26, P. 257–280.

 

[21] Clarida, R., Gali, J., Gertler, M., Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: Evidence and some theory, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2000, CXV (1), P. 147–180. Doi: 10.1162/003355300554692

 

[22] Giannoni, MP., Woodford, M., Optimal interest-rate rules: I. General theory, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2003, No.W.9419. Doi: 10.3386/w9419

 

[23] An, S., Schorfheide, F., Bayesian Analysis of DSGE Models, Econometric Reviews, 2007, 26(2), P.113-172. Doi: 10.1080/07474930701220071

 

[24] Hansen, L.P., Large sample properties of generalized method of moment’s estimators, Econometrica, 1982, 50, P. 1029–1054. Doi: 10.2307/1912775

 

[25] Izadikhah, M., Saen, RF., Ahmadi, K., How to assess sustainability of suppliers in the presence of dual-role factor and volume discounts? A data envelopment analysis approach, Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 34(03), 1740016, Doi: 10.1142/S0217595917400164

 

[26] Boivin, J., Has U.S. Monetary Policy Changed? Evidence from Drifting Coefficients and Real-Time Data, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2006, 38(5), P. 1149-1173. Doi:10.3386/w11314

 

[27] Parvin, s., Shakeri, A., Ahmadian, A., Balance Sheet Effects Of Monetary Policy on Banking System andv Macroeconomic Variables of The Iranian Economy: A DSGE Approach, Iranian  Econnomic Research, 2014, 19(58), P. 77 -115.

 

[28] Rafei, M., Bahrami, J., Daneshjafari, D., Evaluation of Fiscal Policy for Economy of Iran in a Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model based on Real Business Cycles, Economic Research, 2014, 14(54), P. 33-65.