ارزیابی تأثیر توسعۀ معماری میان‌افزا بر مشارکت اجتماعی شهروندان در بافت‌های تاریخی (مطالعۀ موردی: گذر تاریخی محمدیۀ شهر قزوین

الموضوعات :

عباس ده باشی پور ¹ , جمال الدین سهیلی ²

1 - دانش آموخته ی کارشناسی ارشد مهندسی معماری دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد قزوین
2 - دانشیار گروه معماری، دانشکدۀ معماری و شهرسازی، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران

تاريخ الإرسال : 19 الأحد , صفر, 1443 تاريخ التأكيد : 19 الأربعاء , ربيع الثاني, 1443 تاريخ الإصدار : 13 الجمعة , ذو الحجة, 1442

الکلمات المفتاحية: توسعۀ معماری میان افزا, بافت تاریخی, گذر محمدیۀ شهر قزوین, مشارکت اجتماعی,

ملخص المقالة :

توسعۀ معماری میان افزا با پرداختن به توسعه در درون و بازتوسعۀ محدوده، بااستفاده از پتانسیل های آن (مانند تاریخی بودن) سعی در بهره برداری از زمین های بلااستفاده و فرسوده در بافت شهری، از طریق خلق و یا بازسازی فضا، جهت جلوگیری از خزش شهری و بهبود شرایط بافت داشته و در شهرهایی نظیر قزوین که دائما در حال افزایش جمعیت بوده و موانع طبیعی و مصنوعی سبب محدودیت جهات گسترش آن شده، مهم تر می نماید. چون توسعۀ معماری میان افزا، میان بافت و در ارتباط مستقیم با جامعه شکل می گیرد، مشارکت اجتماعی به معنای فعالیت های ارادی افراد جهت ارتقاء حیات اجتماعی خود، به عنوان پتانسیلی در تمامی مراحل توسعه مدنظر قرار می گیرد. هدف اصلی این پژوهش پرداختن به بیان چگونگی رابطۀ میان دو متغیر فوق بااستفاده از روش تحقیق همبستگی می باشد. پس از مطالعات کتابخانه ای و تحقیقات میدانی، شاخص ها، مؤلفه ها و گویه هایی برای متغیرها تبیین، مدلی مفهومی جهت توجیه همبستگی آن ها ارائه و مطابق آن پرسشنامه ای تدوین و توزیع شد که با استفاده ازضریب آلفای کرونباخ، میزان پایایی آن تعیین و با استفاده از روش SPSS، ضریب پیرسون معادل 0.830 (نشان از همبستگی بالا و مثبت متغیرها) و ضریب معناداری معادل 0.000 (نشان از رابطه ای معنادار میان متغیرها)، محاسبه شد. نتیجۀ این پژوهش بیان می دارد که مفهوم توسعۀ معماری میان افزا با هدف تأمین نیازهای همه جانبۀ کاربران و با توجه به پتانسیل های موجود در محل، سبب ایجاد اعتماد و ارتقاء حس رضایت در افراد و نتیجتا منجر به گسترش همکاری و استفاده از توانایی های بالقوۀ آنان شده و افزایش مشارکت اجتماعی را در تمامی مراحل سبب می شود.

المصادر:

1. Abdullahpour. Nastaran and Soheili. Jamaleddin (2017). “Evaluation of the influential components of physical factors of social participation in the architecture of student camp complexes”. Social development studies in Iran Research Journal. 9(4). 69-82. (in Persian)


2. Abrahams. J. H (1990). Fundamentals of Sociological Development. Translated by Hassan Pouyan. First Volume. Chapakhsh Publications. Second Edition. Tehran. (in Persian)


3. Ahmadi. Zainab (2017). “Investigating the effects of social participation on the regeneration of worn-out urban fabric in Iran”. The Second National Conference on New Research and Educational Findings in Civil Engineering, Architecture, Urban Planning and Environment of Iran. Tehran. University of Tehran. (in Persian)


4. Alavi Tabar. Alireza. (2000).  Pattern of Citizen Participation in Cities Management (Global Experiences and Iran). First Volume. Municipalities Publications. First Edition. Tehran. (in Persian)


5. Alexander. C. (1977). A pattern Language. Oxford University press. New York.


6. Alipour. Roja and Khademi. Massoud (2011). “The effect of infill structures on stimulation of regeneration in worn tissues”. Landscape Journal. (14). 80-83. (in Persian)


7. Almond. G. A and Powell. G. B (2002). “Citizen participation and political presence”. Translated by Alireza Tayeb. Political-economic information Quarterly. (163-164). 136-147. (in Persian)


8. Anvari. Hassan. (2015). Culture of the day. Sokhan Publications. Ninth Edition. Tehran. (in Persian)


9. Arjmand Abbasi. Parisa (2008). “Feasibility study of endogenous development in Iran with the help of GIS tool Case study: Dehvanak neighborhood”. Master Thesis, University of Tehran. Supervisor: Farshad Nourian. Urbanism. Tehran. (in Persian).


10. Arjmandnia. Asghar. (2006). The mechanism of organizing and participation of people and non-governmental organizations in construction, exploitation and accommodation in new cities. Proceedings of urban development projects in new cities. Third Volume. New Civil City Publications. First Edition Tehran. (in Persian)


11. Azadkhani. Pakzad..Hosseinzadeh. Jafar and Heydari. Zohreh (2019). “Analysis of suitable zones of infill development in Ilam city”. Human settlement planning studies Research Journal. 14(1). 93-109. (in Persian)


12. Azemati. Hamid Reza..Sharghi. Ali..Hashemi. Zahra and Orouji. Mohammad Javad (2018). “Increasing the sense of belonging of citizens and promoting the identity of the city in the connection of urban landscape with historical buildings (Case study: Bastam historical complex and Taleghani street)”. Third National Conference on Architecture and Sustainable City. Tarbiat Dabir Shahid Rajaei University. Tehran. (in Persian)


13. Azemati. Hamidreza..Miri. Seyedeh Laia and Pour Baqer. Somayeh (2016). “Physical factors affecting the promotion of vitality in the regeneration of abandoned urban spaces”. International Conference on Architectural and Urban Engineering. Tehran. Iran. (in Persian)


14. Azkia. Mustafa and Ghaffari. Gholam Reza. (2004). Rural development with emphasis on the rural community of Iran. Ney Publications. First Edition. Tehran. (in Persian)


15. Babaie Aghdam. Fereydun..Ahar. Hasan..Gheysari. Hadithe and Tahmasebi. Farrokh (2017). “Analysis of intelligent development capacities of Maragheh city by applying the principle of infill development”. Geography and Planning Research Journal. 21(61). 75-91. (in Persian)


16. Bahadori. Lida (1998). “Explanatory report of urban development plan through revitalization and revitalization of dilapidated urban fabric of Birjand city”. Master Thesis, Shahid Beheshti University. Supervisor: Ghaffari. Urban Design. Tehran. (in Persian)


17. Bani Hashemi. Um Hani.. Sarvar. Rahim and Yousef Ali. Ziari (2014). “Infill architecture development in dilapidated urban tissues (Case study: Khani Abad neighborhood of Tehran)”. Land. 10(40). 41-54. (in Persian)


18. Birou. A. (1992). Social science culture. Translated by Baqer Sarukhani. Kayhan Publications. Second Edition. Tehran. (in Persian)


19. Caves. R. W. (2005). Encyclopedia of the city. Abingdon, Oxon, OX, New York, NY: Routledge.


20. Chalabi. Massoud. (2002). Experimental study of personality system in Iran. Published by Culture, Art and Communication Research Institute. First Edition. Tehran. (in Persian)


21. Cox. J. (2010): Immigrant Assimilation, Trust and Social Capital. Forschungsinstiut, zur Zukunft der Arbit Institute for the Study of Labor. Discussion Paper No. 5063.


22. Durkheim. E. (1990). About the division of social work. Translated by Alireza Tayeb. Babol Library Publications. First Edition. Tehran. (in Persian)


23. (EPA), United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2004). Making way for urban infill and brown field Redevelopment. John Wiley & Sons. New Jersey.


24. Fakhr Ahmad. Seyed Mahdi..Mohammad Reza. Pour Jafar and Taghvaei. Ali Akbar (2008). “Intra-city development planning, methods and necessities; Case Study: Dogonbadan (Gachsaran)”. City identity Research Journal. 2(2). 57-67. (in Persian)


25. Frankish. C. J..Kwan. B. A..Ratner. P..Higgins. J. and Larsen. c. (2005): Challenges of citizen participation in regional health authorities. Social Science & Medicine. 54. pp: 1471–1480.


26. Fukuyama. F. (2002): Social Capital and Development: the Coming Agena. SAIS Review. 22(1). pp: 23-37.


27. Ghadiri. Bahram and Arasteh. Shiva. (2006). New structures in historical environments. Cultural Research Office Publications. First Edition. Tehran. (in Persian)


28. Ghaffari. Gholamreza and Niazi. Mohsen. (2007). Sociology of participation. Nazdic publications. First Edition. Tehran. (in Persian)


29. Ghasemi. Mohammad Ali (2002). “Investigation of socio-economic factors affecting the participation of villagers in development projects: case study the central part of Kashan city”. Village and development Research Journal. 8(4). 78-111. (in Persian)


30. Gholabi. Fatemeh and Akhshi. Nazila (2015). “Social participation and social vitality”. Applied Sociology Research Journal. 26(59). 139-160. (in Persian)


31. Glendening. P. and Kietnitz. R. (2001). Models and Guidelines for Infill Development. Maryland Department of Planning.


32. Hajipour. Khalil..Fakhrahmad. Seyed Mojtaba and Soltani. Ali (2019). “Analysis of residents' satisfaction with the neighborhood based on the components of security and sense of belonging (Case study: Shiraz)”. Urbanism knowledge Research Journal. 2(4). 33-49. (in Persian)


33. Hojjat. Isa (2006). “Man-made identity, identity-making human (reflection on the relationship between identity and architecture)”. beautiful arts  Research Journal. 24(1010). 55-62. (in Persian)


34. Holub. R. (1999). Criticism in the public sphere. Translated by Hossein Bashirieh. Ney Publications. Second Edition. Tehran. (in Persian)


35. Infill Development Standards and Policy Guide. (2006). Center of Urban Policy Research. Edward. J. Bloustein School of Planning & Public Policy Rutgers , The State University Of New Jersey New Brunswick.


36. Ismailpour. Najma..Rahimian. Mohammad Hassan and Ghorbani. Sahar (2013). “Recreating worn-out urban structures with an emphasis on social mobilization; Case study of slaughterhouse neighborhood in Yazd”. Urban and regional studies and researches. 4(15). 123-140. (in Persian)


37. Khak Zand. Mahdi and Mokhtari. Mojdeh (2015). “Infill development, an approach to sustainable urban design”. International Congress on Sustainability in Architecture and Urban Planning. Dubai. (in Persian)


38. Mafi. Ezatullah and Namvar. Hamid (2016). “Investigating the factors affecting the social participation of citizens in urban development and management”. The Second National Conference on Modern Management Sciences and Sustainable Planning in Iran. Tehran. (in Persian).


39. Mahdi Nejad. Jamaleddin.. Azemati. Hamidreza and Sadeghi Habibabad. Ali (2017). “Exploration and importance of infill development in preserving and maintenancing valuable historical contexts”. Third National Conference on Architecture and Sustainable City. Tarbiat Dabir Shahid Rajaei University. Tehran. (in Persian)


40. Maknoon. Reza (2002). “Sustainable development and challenges”. Forty-fourth meeting of the presidents of universities and scientific and research centers (Collection of articles). Sharif University of Technology, Tehran. 7-9. (in Persian)


41. Mirmoghtadai. Mahta..Rafieian. Mojtaba and Sangi. Elham (2010). “A reflection on the concept of infill development and its necessity in urban areas”. Municipalities Journal. 10(98). 44-51. (in Persian)


42. Mohseni Tabrizi. Alireza (1990). “Investigating the participatory areas of the villagers and its relationship with agricultural promotion”. Ministry of Agriculture. First Edition. Tehran. (in Persian)


43. Mousavi. Mir Taher (2006). “Social participation as one of the components of social capital”. Social Welfare Research Journal. 6(23). 67-92. (in Persian)


44. Municipal Research & Services Center of Washington. (1997). Infill Development Strategies for Shaping Livable Neighborhoods. Report No.38.


45. Nowruzi. Faizullah and Bakhtiari. Mahnaz (2010). “Social participation and social factors affecting it”. Strategy Research Journal. 18(53). 249-269. (in Persian)


46. OKI’s Community Choices. (2007). Infill Development.


47. Patrick. J. Boyle. (1996). Planning in the development process. Translated by Gholamreza Ahmadi and Saeed Shahabi. Phoenix Publications. First Edition. Tehran. (in Persian)


48. Pour Mohammadi. Mohammad Reza..shafa’ati. Arezoo and maleki. Kiomars (2013). “An Attitude Towards Infill Development and Its Strategic Role in Sustainable Urban Development”. Geography and Environmental Planning Research Journal. University of Esfahan. Esfahan. (in Persian)


49. Qara Begloo. Minoo..Nejad Ebrahimi. Ahad and Ardabilchi. Ilqar (2019). “Infill architecture; An interdisciplinary approach to design in a historical context (Case study: Constitutional commercial complex in the historical context of Tabriz Bazaar)”. Garden Comment Research Journal. 16(76). 57-68. (in Persian)


50. Rahnama. Mohammad Rahim and Razavi. Mohammad Mohsen (2012). “Investigating the effect of sense of spatial belonging on social capital and participation in neighborhoods of Mashhad”. beautiful arts- Architecture and Urbanism Research Journal. 17(50). 29-36. (in Persian)


51. Saeedi Rezvani. Navid and Kazemian. Gholamreza. (2001). Feasibility study of assigning new tasks to municipalities. First Volume (Review of Theoretical Developments and Global Experiences). Municipalities Publications. First Edition. Tehran. (in Persian)


52. Saeedi Rezvani. Navid and Kazemi. Davood (2011). “Recognition of the endogenous development framework in relation to the critique of current housing development policies (Mehr Housing) (Case study: Natanz city)”. Human Geography Research, Research Journal. 43(75). 113-132. (in Persian)


53. Saeedi Rezvani. Navid..Davoodpour. Zohreh..Fadavi. Elham and Sarvar. Rahim (2013). “Application of infill development principles in spatial-functional improvement of urban tissues (Case study: Region 17 of Tehran Municipality)”. Geography Research Journal. 11(36). 159-180. (in Persian)


54. Saif al-Dini. Franak. (1999). Vocabulary of urban and regional planning. Shiraz University Publications. First Edition. Shiraz. (in Persian)


55. Sharifian. Ehsan (2010). "Infill development Utilizing the internal capacities of the city”. Landscape Journal. 2(10). 47-50. (in Persian)


56. Soltani. Ali and Tahaei Moghaddam. Seyedeh Pardis (2020). “Assessing the status of sustainability components in Saghrisazan neighborhood of Rasht city using PESTEL analysis”. Urban planning Research Journal. 11(42). 21-36. (in Persian)


57. Soltani. Ali..Rahimi. Mohammad and Amiri. Seyed Noureddin (2020). “Identifying the historical context of Jahrom city with spatial analysis approach”. Urban planning Research Journal. Publish online: http://jupm.miau.ac.ir/article_4149.html. (in Persian)


58. Suchman. Diane R. & Sowell. Margaret B. (1997).  Developing Infill Housing in Inner-City.


59. Talkhab. Majid..Soltani. Ali..Khamseh. Mohsen and Hosseinpour. Mohammad (2015). “Analysis of neighborhood participatory management with emphasis on the role of social capital (Case study: District 1, Region 15 of Tehran Municipality)”. Geographical research of urban planning. 13(1). 101-122. (In Persian)


60. Tavassoli. Gholamabbas. (2010). Sociological Theories. Samt Publications. Second Edition. Tehran. (in Persian)


61. Vahida. Fereydun. and Niazi. Mohsen (2004). “The Relationship between Family Structure and Social Participation in Kashan”. Social Science Letter Research Journal. (23). 117-145. (in Persian)


62. varethi. Hamid Reza (2004). “An analysis of the situation of the historical context of Isfahan”. Isfahan Culture Quarterly. (27 & 28). 62-71. (in Persian)


63. Wheeler. Stephen M. (2001). Smart infill creating more livable communities in the bay area. greenbelt alliance.


64. Willey. John. and sons. (2006). Planning and Urban Design Standards. American Planning Association (APA).


65. Zare Shahabadi. Akbar and Nourian Najaf. Mohammad (2012). “Investigating the relationship between social trust and social participation among students of Yazd University”. Economic Sociology and Development Research Journal. (1). 47-69. (in Persian)


66. Ziari. Keramatullah..Abbasi Fallah. Vahid..Heydari. Asghar and Najafi. Ismail (2018). “Renovation of worn-out tissue using participatory approach and social capital (Case study: District 2, Region 9 of Tehran)”. Geography and Human Relations. 1(1). 390-411. (in Persian)