The Effects of Forming Parameters on the Single Point Incremental Forming of 1050 Aluminum Alloy Sheet
الموضوعات :
R Safdarian
1
(Department of Mechanical Engineering, Behbahan Khatam Alanbia University of Technology, Behbahan, Iran)
الکلمات المفتاحية: Response surface method (RSM), Single point incremental forming (SPIF), Finite element method (FEM), Fracture, GTN damage model,
ملخص المقالة :
The single point incremental forming (SPIF) is one of the dieless forming processes which is widely used in the sheet metal forming. The correct selection of the SPIF parameters influences the formability and quality of the product. In the present study, the Gurson-Tvergaard Needleman (GTN) damage model was used for the fracture prediction in the numerical simulation of the SPIF process of aluminum alloy 1050. The GTN parameters of AA 1050 sheet were firstly identified by the numerical simulation of tensile test and comparison of the experimental and numerical stress-strain curves. The identified parameters of the GTN damage model were used for fracture prediction in the SPIF process. The numerical results of the fracture position, thickness variation across the sample and forming height were compared with the experimental results. The numerical results had good agreement with the experimental ones. The effect of SPIF main parameters was investigated on the formability of samples by the verified numerical model. These parameters were tool rotation speed, tool feed rate, tool diameter, wall angle of the sample, vertical pitch, and friction between the tool and the blank.
[1] Bagudanch I., Garcia-Romeu M.L., Ferrer I., Lupiañez J., 2013, The effect of process parameters on the energy consumption in single point incremental forming, Procedia Engineering 63: 346-353.
[2] Gatea S., Ou H., McCartney G., 2016, Review on the influence of process parameters in incremental sheet forming, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 87(1): 479-499.
[3] Raju C., Haloi N., Sathiya Narayanan C., 2017, Strain distribution and failure mode in single point incremental forming (SPIF) of multiple commercially pure aluminum sheets, Journal of Manufacturing Processes 30: 328-335.
[4] Guzmán C.F., Yuan S., Duchêne L., Saavedra Flores E.I., Habraken A.M., 2018, Damage prediction in single point incremental forming using an extended Gurson model, International Journal of Solids and Structures 151: 45-56.
[5] Dakhli M., Boulila A., Tourki Z., 2017, Effect of generatrix profile on single-point incremental forming parameters,The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 93(5): 2505-2516.
[6] McAnulty T., Jeswiet J., Doolan M., Formability in single point incremental forming: A comparative analysis of the state of the art, CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 16: 43-54.
[7] Bagudanch I., Centeno G., Vallellano C., Garcia-Romeu M.L., 2013, Forming force in single point incremental forming under different bending conditions, Procedia Engineering 63: 354-360.
[8] Palumbo G., Brandizzi M., 2012, Experimental investigations on the single point incremental forming of a titanium alloy component combining static heating with high tool rotation speed, Materials & Design 40: 43-51.
[9] Hadoush A., van den Boogaard A.H., 2009, Substructuring in the implicit simulation of single point incremental sheet forming, International Journal of Material Forming 2(3): 181-189.
[10] Duflou J.R., Verbert J., Belkassem B., Gu J., Sol H., Henrard C., Habraken A.M., Process window enhancement for single point incremental forming through multi-step toolpaths, CIRP Annals 57(1): 253-256.
[11] Gupta P., Jeswiet J., 2017, Observations on heat generated in single point incremental forming, Procedia Engineering 183:161-167.
[12] Edwards W.L., Grimm T.J., Ragai I., Roth J.T., Optimum process parameters for springback reduction of single point incrementally formed polycarbonate, Procedia Manufacturing 10: 329-338.
[13] Bansal A., Lingam R., Yadav S.K., Venkata Reddy N., 2017, Prediction of forming forces in single point incremental forming, Journal of Manufacturing Processes 28: 486-493.
[14] Behera A.K., de Sousa R.A., Ingarao G., Oleksik V., 2017, Single point incremental forming: An assessment of the progress and technology trends from 2005 to 2015, Journal of Manufacturing Processes 27: 37-62.
[15] Martins P.A.F., Bay N., Skjoedt M., Silva M.B., 2008, Theory of single point incremental forming, CIRP Annals 57(1): 247-252.
[16] Martínez-Romero O., García-Romeu M.L., Olvera-Trejo D., Bagudanch I., Elías-Zúñiga A., 2014, Tool dynamics during single point incremental forming process, Procedia Engineering 81: 2286-2291.
[17] (ASTM) ASfTaM, Metals Test Methods and Analytical Procedures, 1999: 78-98, 501-508.
[18] Chu C.C., Needleman A., 1980, Void nucleation effects in biaxially stretched sheets, Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology 102(3): 249-256.
[19] He M., Li F., Wang Z., 2011, Forming limit stress diagram prediction of aluminum alloy 5052 based on GTN model parameters determined by in situ tensile test, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 24(3): 378-386.
[20] Kacem A., Jégat A., Krichen A., Manach P.Y., 2013, Forming limits in the hole-flanging process by coupled and uncoupled damage models, AIP Conference Proceedings 1567(1): 575-578.
[21] Hibbitt K., Sorensen, 2002, ABAQUS/CAE User's Manual, Incorporated.
[22] Hirt G., Ames J., Bambach M., Kopp R., 2004, Forming strategies and process modelling for CNC incremental sheet forming, CIRP Annals 53(1): 203-206.
