بررسی روابط بین موفقیت تحصیلی دانش آموزان و توانایی شناختی مغز

الموضوعات :

پریسا کرمی ¹ (دانشجوی دکترای روانشناسی دانشگاه ازاد بیرجند)
نوشین کشفی ² (دانشجو دکتری روانشناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد بیرجند.)
سمانه سادات جعفر طباطبایی ³ (دکتری روانشناسی تربیتی، استادیار دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد بیرجند.)

تاريخ الإرسال : 15 الثلاثاء , ذو القعدة, 1443 تاريخ التأكيد : 15 الثلاثاء , ذو القعدة, 1443 تاريخ الإصدار : 21 الأحد , شوال, 1443

الکلمات المفتاحية:

ملخص المقالة :

هدف: در دنیای امروز آموزش، یکی از مهمترین ضروریات زندگی به شمار میرود؛ بطوریکه بدون آموزش ادامه زندگی در معرض خطر قرار میگیرد، ازآنجاییکه آموزش، نیازمند هزینه و بودجه زیادی است و آموزش تحصیلی دانش آموزان نیازمند موفقیت تحصیلی آنان است هدف از این مطالعه بررسی ارتباط میان عملکرد تحصیلی دانش آموزان و توانایی شناختی آن هاست. روش: این مطالعه مقطعی، مورد پژوهی در مورد دانش آموزان دبیرستان های ناحیه3 شهر مشهد در سال96-97 انجام شد و 395 نفر با روش نمونه گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند. ابزار مورد استفاده دراین مطالعه پرسشنامه توانایی های شناختی 30 گویه ای در 7 زیر مقیاس" حافظه فعال " ، " کنترل مهاری و توجه انتخابی " ، " تصمیم گیری "، "برنامه ریزی "، "توجه پایدار و انعطاف پذیری شناختی"بود. برای بررسی همبستگی بین معدل و کارکرد های اجرایی از آزمون همبستگی پیرسون استفاده شد. یافته ها: همبستگی معنی داری بین معدل تحصیلی و کل توانایی های شناختی و زیر مقیاس های حافظه فعال، کنترل مهاری و توجه انتخابی، تصمیم گیری، برنامه ریزی ، توجه پایدار و انعطاف پذیری شناختی (همگی در سطح p =0/0001) به غیر از شناخت اجتماعی (p= 0/969) مشاهده شد. نتیجه گیری: زیر مقیاس های توانایی شناختی ، حافظه فعال ، کنترل مهاری و توجه انتخابی، تصمیم گیری، برنامه ریزی، تئجه پایدار و انعطاف پذیری شناختی با معدل تحصیلی دانش آموزان ارتباط مثبت داشت.

المصادر:

 

Ackerman PL, Beier ME, Boyle MO. Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs? Psychol Bull. 2005;131:30-60.         

Anderson V, Rani Jacobs J, Anderson P. Executive functions and the frontal lobes: A lifespan perspective. New York: Taylor and Francis; 2008.

Bernstein J, Waber D. Executive capabilities from a developmental perspective. In:Meltzer L, editor. Executive function on education: From theory to practice. New York: Guilford Press; 2007

Besta JB, Millerb PH, Jack A. Naglieric relations between executive function and academic achievement from ages 5 to 17 in a large, representative national sample. Learn Ind Diff. 2011;21(4):327-36.

Blair C. How similar are fluid cognition and genera intelligence? A developmental neuroscience perspective on fluid cognition as an aspect of human cognitive ability. Behav Brain Sci. 2006;29:109-60.

Bosma H, Boxtel MPJ, Ponds RWHM, Houx PJH, Jolles J. Education and age-related cognitive decline: The contribution of mental workload. Educ Gerontol. 2003;29:165-73.

Brown AL. Transforming schools into communities of thinking and learning about serious matters. Am Psychol.  1997;52(4):399-413.

Cartwright KB. Literacy processes: Cognitive flexibility in learning and teaching. New York: Guilford Press; 2008.

Carretti B, Cornoldi C, De Beni R, Romano M. Updating in working memory: A comparison of good and poor comprehenders. J Exp Child Psychol. 2005;91:45-66.

Denckla M. Executive function: Binding together the definitions of attention deficit/ hyperactivity disorder and learning  disabilities. In: Meltzer L, editor. Executive function on education: From theory to practice. New York: Guilford Press; 2007.

Detre JA, Wang J. Technical aspects and utilities of fMRI using BOLD and ASL. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113:621-34.

De La Paz S. Best practices in teaching writing to students with special needs. In: Graham S, McArthur CA, Fitzgerald J, editors. Best practices in writing instruction. New York: Guilford Press; 2007.

Deak GO. Foreword. In: Cartwright KB, editor. Literacyprocesses: Cognitive flexibility in learning and teaching New York: Guilford Press; 2008.

Diamond A. The early development of executive functions. In: Bialystok E, Craik F, editors. Lifespan cognition: Mechanisms of change. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.

Gatz M, Svedberg P, Pedersen NL, Mortimer JA, Berg S, Johansson B. Education and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease:Findings from the study of dementia in Swedish twins. J Gerontol Ser Psychol Sci Soc. 2001;56(5):292-300.

Gathercole S, Pickering SJ, Knight C, Stegmann Z. Working memory skills and educational attainment Evidence for national curriculum assessment at 7 and 14 years of age. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2004;18:1-16.

Ghorbanalizadeh Kh. Correlation between working memory with learning strategy and educational performance in Langrud high school students [dissertation]. Tehran: Allame Tabatabaye University; 2005. [Persian]

Graham S. Writing. In: Alexander PA, Winnie PH, editors. Handbook of educational psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2006.

Harris KR, Graham S. Helping young writers master the craft: Strategy instruction and self-regulation in the writing process. Cambridge, MA: Brookline; 1992.

Harris KR, Graham S, Mason LH. Self-regulated  strategy development in the classroom: Part of a balanced approach to writing instruction for students with disabilities. Except Child. 2003;35(7):1-16.

Jacobson D, Parker A, Spetzler C, Bruine de Bruin W, Hollenbeck K, Heckerman D, et al. Improved learning in U.S. history and decision competence with decision-focused curriculum. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):457-75.

Madrigal R. Hot vs. cold cognitions and consumers'reactions to sporting event outcomes. J Consum Psychol 2008;18(4):304-19

Meltzer L. Promoting executive function in theclassroom. New York: Guilford Press; 2010.

Meltzer L. Strategy use in children with learning disabilities: The challenge of assessment. In: Meltzer L, editor. Strategy assessment and instruction for students with learning disabilities: From theory to practice. Austin, TX: PRO-ED Publisher; 1993.

Meltzer L, Krishnan K. Executive function difficulties and learning disabilities: Understandings and misunderstandings. In: Meltzer L, editor. Executive function in education: From theory to practice. New York: Guilford Press; 2007.

Meltzer L. Executive function in education: From theory to practice. New York: Guilford Press; 2007.

Mizuno K, Tanaka M, Fukuda S, lmai-Matsumura K. Relationship between cognitive function and prevalence of decrease in intrinsic academic motivation in adolescents. Behav Brain Funct. 2011;7:4.

Missiuna C, Pollock N, Law M. The perceived efficacy and goal setting system. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 2004.

Missiuna C, Pollock N, Law M, Walter S, Cavey N. Examination of the perceived efficacy and goal setting system with children with disabilities, their parents and teachers. Am J Occup Ther. 2007;60(2):204

Murray B, Kaniasty K, Robertson DU. The combined and differential roles of working memory mechanisms in academic achievement. Pennsylvania: Indiana University of Pennsylvania; 2010.

Nejati V. Cognitive abilities questionnaire: Designing and psychometric properties. Adv Cogn Sci. 2006;32:33-9. [Persian]

Nejati V. Cognitive abilities questionnaire: Designing and evaluation of psychometric properties. Adv Cogn Sci 2013;3:11-5. [Persian]

Pressley M, Woloshyn V. Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children’s academic performance. 2^nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Brookline; 1995.

Riding RJ, Asadzadeh H, Grimley M, Banner G Working memory, cognitive style and academic attainment In: Nata R, editor. Progress in education. New York: Nava Science Publishers; 2001.

Stern Y. Cognitive reserve. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47:2015-28.

Vexelman C. Impact of working memory deficits on academic achievements with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder [dissertation]. Toronto: University of Toronto; 2009

Yu C. Perceptual learning in contrast discrimination and the (minimal) role of context. J Vision. 2004;4:169-82.