ارزیابی میزان رضایتمندی از تحقق ابعاد شهر دوستدار سالمند از منظر اجتماع محلی (مطالعه موردی: منطقه ۳ کلانشهر کرج)
الموضوعات :علی آرایی 1 , حسین نظم فر 2 , بختیار عزت پناه 3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری تخصصی جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، واحد مرند، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرند، ایران
2 - استاد گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران
3 - استادیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، واحد مرند، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرند، ایران
الکلمات المفتاحية: سالمندی جمعیت, کرج, رضایتمندی, فضاهای عمومی, شهر دوستدار سالمند,
ملخص المقالة :
در این پژوهش با ارزیابی وضعیت ابعاد تحقق شهر دوستدار سالمند، محلات منطقه ۳ کلانشهر کرج مورد بررسی قرار می‌گیرد. پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر روش توصیفی ـ تحلیلی می‌باشد. در این بررسی برای تجزیه وتحلیل داده‌ها از روش‌های استنباطی؛ آزمون T تک نمونه‌ای؛ آزمون تحلیل واریانس ANOVA و آزمون تعقیبی استفاده شده است. بر اساس یافته‌های آزمون t، شاخص کلی شهر دوستدار سالمند در محدوده مورد بررسی با میانگین 3.47 و آماره t 2.701- پایین‌تر از مد متوسط نظری یا مطلوبیت عددی آزمون (3.5) قرار دارد. در مجموع ارزیابی قابل قبولی از دیدگاه شهروندان وجود ندارند. اما در میان وضعیت ابعاد می‌توان گفت که ابعاد حمل و نقل و دسترسی (15/4) و احترام و پذیرش اجتماعی (71/3) دارای وضعیت قابل قبولی بوده اند. اما از دید ساکنان ابعاد فضاهای باز و ساختمان‌ها (39/3)، مسکن (06/3) و مشارکت اجتماعی (04/3) دارای ضعیف‌ترین وضعیت بوده‌اند. نتایج آزمون تعقیبی نشان می‌دهد که ارزیابی ابعاد یکسان نبوده و تفاوت معناداری در سطح محلات وجود دارد. در این میان، بعد حمل و نقل و دسترسی با مقدار F، 21.01 بیشترین مقدار اختلاف و تفاوت را دارد و می‌توان گفت که در بعد مشارکت اجتماعی، اختلاف تحقق شهر دوستدار سالمند در محلات مورد مطالعه بیش از سایر ابعاد است. پس از آن، بعد احترام و پذیرش اجتماعی با مقدار F، 17.03، فضاهای باز و ساختمان‌ها با آماره 14.32، مسکن با 11.03 و مشارکت اجتماعی با آماره 9.36 در رتبه‌های بعدی قرار دارند.
Ahmadi, Lawyer and Beheshti, Seyed Samad (2007). A Study of Demographic and Welfare
Characteristics in Iran, Population Quarterly, No. 61, pp. 40-59.
Ali Al-Hesabi, Mehran and Rafiei Farkhondeh (2012). Assessing the needs of the elderly in urban
spaces, a case study: Khald Brin Park, Shiraz. Armanshahr Architecture and Urban Planning, 5 (9),
247-257.
Asghari, A., Kamrava, S. K., Ghalehbaghi, B., & Nojomi, M. (2012). Subjective sleep quality in urban
population. Archives of Iranian medicine, 15(2), 95-98.
Asongu, S. A., Agboola, M. O., Alola, A. A., & Bekun, F. V. (2020). The criticality of growth,
urbanization, electricity and fossil fuel consumption to environment sustainability in Africa.
Science of the Total Environment, 712, 136376.
Baum-Snow, N., Henderson, J. V., Turner, M. A., Zhang, Q., & Brandt, L. (2020). Does investment in
national highways help or hurt hinterland city growth? Journal of Urban Economics, 115, 103124.
Bettencourt, L. M. (2020). Urban growth and the emergent statistics of cities. Science Advances,
6(34), eaat8812.
Buffel, T., & Phillipson, C. (2016). Can global cities be ‘age-friendly cities’? Urban development and
ageing populations. Cities, 55, 94-100.
Buffel, T., Phillipson, C., & Scharf, T. (2018). Ageing in urban environments: Developing ‘agefriendly’cities.Critical Social Policy, 32(4), 597-617.
Burton, Elizabeth and Mitchell, Lane (2013). Universal urban design; Streets for life. Translated by
Elahe Saki and Farnaz Fanaei, Tehran: Armanshahr Publications.
Chan, A. W., Chan, H. Y., Chan, I. K., Cheung, B. Y., & Lee, D. T. (2016). An age-friendly living
environment as seen by Chinese older adults: A “Photovoice” study. International journal of
environmental research and public health, 13(9), 913.
Efroymson, D. (2015). Urban Menace or Valuable Asset? The Social and Economic Role of Street
Vendors in Cities. Health Bridge.
Emlet, C. A., & Moceri, J. T. (2012). The importance of social connectedness in building age-friendly
communities. Journal of aging research, 2012.
Esaluo, A. Bayat, M. Bahrami, A. (2014). Livability Imagery, A New Approach to Improving the
Quality of Life in Rural Communities (Case Study: Qom City, Kohak District) », Journal of
Environmental and Rural Housing, Volume 33, Number 146, pp. 120-107.
Farhoudi, Rahmatullah and Madahi Jila (2010). Investigating the functions of urban areas; Case study
Karaj city, Quarterly Journal of Human Geography, second year, third issue, pp. 123-136.
Fitzgerald, K. G., & Caro, F. G. (2015). An overview of age-friendly cities and communities around
the world. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26(1-2), 1-18.
Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class (Vol. 9). New York: Basic books.
Galea, S., Nandi, A., & Vlahov, D. (2005). The epidemiology of post-traumatic stress disorder after
disasters. Epidemiologic reviews, 27(1), 78-91.
Gulliford, M. (2003). Equity and access to health care. I: Gulliford M, Morgan M (eds). Access to
health care.
Habibi, Seyed Mohsen (2000). "Urban Space: A Theoretical Encounter". Sefeh Magazine, Shahid
Beheshti University, No. 33, pp. 11 and 12.
Habitat, U. N. (2016). World Cities Report 2016: Urbanization and Development–Emerging Futures.
Publisher: UN-Habitat.
Hatami, Mojtaba, Soleimani, Hossein, Gandamkar, Amir, Saberi, Hamid. (2020). Investigating the
strategies of the viability structure of Abarkooh city. Journal of New Attitudes in Human
Geography, 12 (3), 41-62.
HatamiNejad, Hossein; Heydari, Asghar; Najafi, Ismail; Abbasi Fallah, Wahid (2017). Dimensions of
quality of life of residents of urban car settlements (Case study: Islamabad neighborhood of Tehran
metropolis), Bi-Quarterly Journal of Urban Social Geography, Volume 4, Number 2, pp. 45-23.
Heidari, M.; Mohammadi, Sh. Rahmani, M.; (2021), Monitoring the theory of the right to the city in
the reproduction of the atmosphere of the elderly-friendly city (Case study: the worn texture of the
central part of Zanjan), Human Geography Research, Volume 53 (1), p. 195-212
Honey-Rosés, J., Anguelovski, I., Chireh, V. K., Daher, C., Konijnendijk van den Bosch, C., Litt, J. S.,
... & Sánchez, U. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on public space: an early review of the
emerging questions–design, perceptions and inequities. Cities & Health, 1-17.
Hossein Gholizadeh, A.; Jalukhani Niaraki, M, the first spiritual, M; HajiLu, F; (2020), Spatial
analysis and evaluation of urban spaces from the perspective of an elderly-friendly city (Case
study: District 6 of Tehran), Urban Planning Geography Research, Vol.8 (2), p. 371-389.
Hsu, H. C. (2020). Associations of city-level active aging and age friendliness with well-being among
older adults aged 55 and over in Taiwan. International journal of environmental research and public
health, 17(12), 4304.
Inglehart, R. (1990). Values, ideology, and cognitive mobilization in new social movements.
Challenging the political order: new social and political movements in western democracies, 43-66.
Iranshahi, Ayub and Qala-e-Navi, Mahmoud (2016). Assessing the Conformity of Urban Spaces with
the Characteristics of an Elderly Friendly City, Journal of City Identity, No. 11, No. 30, pp. 69-82.
Jesus, Shahabuddin; Jomehpour, Mahmoud and Khaksari, Ali (2017), Needs and Problems of the
Elderly in Urban Space, Journal of Social Work, Second Year, No. 6, pp. 1-41.
Rogers, W)2003)"The excellent city park system", In what make it great and how to get there", (ed) p
Harnik. The trust for Public land; Pub, Washington, dc
Rostami, Faramarz (2010). Investigating and Analyzing the Distribution of Urban Public Services
from the Perspective of Spatial Justice, Case Study: Yasuj City, Master Thesis in Urban Planning,
Tarbiat Modares University.
Sadeghzadeh, Mohammad (2010) :. Spatial-Physical Organization of Mako City with Emphasis on
Urban Land Use, Master Thesis, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Isfahan.
Sasanpour Farzaneh, Tulaei Simin, Jafari Asadabadi Hamzeh (2013). Viability of cities for sustainable
urban development (Case study: Tehran metropolis). Geography Quarterly, Vol 12,(42); p 129 -
157.
Schmidt, S., & Németh, J. (2010). Space, place and the city: Emerging research on public space design
and planning. Journal of Urban Design, 15(4), 453-457.
Schweinsberg, Stephen, 2002. Sustainable Tourism Development and Rural Community University of
Technology, (Sustainable Tourism Cooperative Research Centre)
Shojaei, Dollar Am (2013). Analysis of effective factors on creating and promoting sociability in
public spaces of Tehran, case study: two neighborhoods and one district in District 7 of Tehran,
M.Sc. Thesis, Tehran University of Arts.
Statistics Center of Iran ر ,Census, Results of Karaj metropolis census in 2016.
Steels, Stephanie, 2015, Key characteristics of age-friendly cities and communities: A review, Cities,
Vol 47, P 45-52.
Sun, Y., Chao, T.-Y., Woo, J., & Au, D. W. (2017). An institutional perspective of Glocalization in
two Asian tigers: The “Structure− Agent− Strategy” of building an age-friendly city. Habitat
International, 59, 101–109.
Tang, B. S., & Wong, S. W. (2008). A longitudinal study of open space zoning and development in
Hong Kong. Landscape and Urban Planning, 87(4), 258-268.
Unwto, (2007). An introduction to destination Management, World tourism organization.www.pub,
Unwto.org.
Van Melik, R., Van Aalst, I., & Van Weesep, J. (2009). The private sector and public space in Dutch
city centers. Cities, 26(4), 202-209.
WHO (2015). Measuring the age-friendliness of cities: A guide to using core indicators.
Wong, R. C. P., Szeto, W. Y., Yang, L., Li, Y. C., & Wong, S. C. (2018). Public transport policy
measures for improving elderly mobility. Transport policy, 63, 73-79.
Wynants, M., & Engelen, S. (Eds.). (2010). We can change the weather: 100 cases of changeability
(Vol. 4). ASP/VUBPRESS/UPA.
Xu, P. (2020, July). Design of Urban Public Space Through Community Building. In International
Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (pp. 227-232). Springer, Cham.
Yang, W., & Kang, J. (2005). Acoustic comfort evaluation in urban open public spaces. Applied
acoustics, 66(2), 211-229.
Zarghani, Hadi; Kharazmi, Omid Ali and Johari, Leila (2015). Evaluation of indicators of elderly
friendly city in Mashhad with emphasis on socio-cultural indicators, Journal of Human Geography
Research, Volume 47, Number 4, pp. 673-688.
