Urban Park Design in Iran: Investigation of Factors Affecting Users’ Psychological Benefits
الموضوعات :Mehraneh Rayatidamavandi 1 , Brian Swank 2 , Mohsen Faizi 3
1 - Ph.D. Candidate, Iran University of Science and Technology, ,Tehran,Iran.
2 - B.Sc. State University of New York-College of Environmental Science and Forestry, New York, United States.
3 - Professor, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
الکلمات المفتاحية: Tehran, Iran, Urban parks, Psychological restoration, Nature, Design guidelines, Users’ preferences and percept,
ملخص المقالة :
Park design in Iran has followed the traditional European style since the Qajar dynasty. Thefamiliarity of Iranians with the spirit of Persian gardens and the low quality of the newest parks is such that usersprefer ancient geometrical Persian gardens. Today, those responsible for the design of urban green spaces lackingexamples differing from the traditional and thus they are in need of an adequate set of guidelines for how to design forpresent conditions, users, and their needs. This research focuses on the relationship between park design componentsand users’ psychological restoration regarding their preferences and perceptions to increase the quality of parks,diminish vandalism, and increase user agency. Psychological restoration is the likeliness that people will be able torest and recover their ability to focus. A random sample of 100 Tehranian residents was taken by presenting themwith images depicting 6 urban parks from around their city. The results were analyzed by grouping into categories:1-similar activities and 2-by counting and categorizing the individual descriptions of components (frequency of words)contributing to restoration likelihood. Findings showed that the categories mentioned most frequently for high levelsof restoration were natural categories including trees, shrubs, grasses, flowers, and water. Findings with low levelsof restoration and recovery consisted of negative contextual conditions and the absence of nature such as high risebuildings around the parks, lack of trees, and crowds of people. The activities imagined more frequently were playingand other physical activities, social activities, and relaxation.
Amackchi, H. (1995). The place of green space in urban comprehensive plan. Tehran: Ministry of Interior.
Appleton, J. (1975). The Experience of Landscape. London: Wiley.
Daneshpour, Z., & Mahmoodpour, A. (2009). Exploring the people's perception of urban public parks in Tehran. Stiges: REAL CORP.
Dines, N., & Cattell, V. (2006). Public Spaces, Social Relations and Well-being. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Fainstein, S. (2005). Cities and diversity. Urban Affairs Review , 41, 3–19.
Faizi, M. (2006). The Role of Urban Parks in a Metropolitan City. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES , 12, 29-34.
Falamaki, M. (2010). Aks-e Rokh-e Bagh [The Picture of Garden]. Tehran: Nashre- Faza.
Francis, C., & Marcus, C. (1998). People Places: Design Guidelines for Urban Open Space. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Gehl, J. (2003). Livet mellem husene udeaktiviteter og udemiljøer (Life Between the Buildings Outdoor Activities and Outdoor Environments). København: Arkitektens Forlag.
Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. (2003). Landscape planning and stress. Urban Forestry and Greening , 1, 1-19.
Hobhouse, P., Hunningher, E., & Harpur, J. (2004). Gardens of Persia. Kales Press.
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology , 3, 169–183.
Lam, K.-C., Ng, S.-L., Hui, W.-C., & Chan, P.-K. (2005). Environmental quality of urbanparks and open spaces in Hong Kong. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment , 1, 55–74.
Lofland, L. (1998). The Public Realm:Quintessential City Life. New Brunswick and London: Aldine Transaction.
Lotfi, S., Mahdi, A., & Mohammadpour, S. (2014). Investigating the Distribution, Standards and Calculation of the Urban Green Space per capita Based on the Soltani's Model. Geography and Urban Planning , 1-18.
Maleki, S., Rahimi, V., Noori, E., & Hatami, D. (2015). Investigating the Impact of Social and Physical Factors of Urban Environments on the Quality of Living. Journal of Geography and Envoronmental Studies , 13 (40), 19-42.
Mansouri , A. (2010). Income of 4 consecutive generations of urban parks. Journal of Manzar , 10.
Medghalchi, L., Ansari, M., & Bemanian, M. (2014). Sense of Place in Persian Garden. Bagh-e- Nazar , 11 (28), 25-38.
Neuvonen, M., Sievänen, T., Tönnes, S., & Koskela, T. (2007). Access to green areas and the frequency of visits – a case study in Helsinki. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening , 4, 235–247.
Nielsen, T., & Hansen, K. (2006). Nearby nature and green areas encourage outdoor.CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture,. Nutrition and Natural Resources , 59, 1-10.
Nordh , H., Hartig, T., HagerhalL, C., & Fry, G. (2009). Components of small urban parks. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening , 8, 225-235.
Nordh, H., & Østby, K. (2013). Pocket parks for people – A study of park design and use. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening , 12, 12-17.
Nordh, H., Hagerhall, C., & Holmqvist, K. (2012). Tracking restorative componentS. Landscape Reaserch .
Stigsdotter, U. K., Ekholm, O., Schipperijn, J., Toftager, M., Kamper-Jørgensen, F., & Randrup, T. B. (2010). Health promoting outdoor environments-Associations between green space, and health, health-related quality of life and stress based on a Danish national representative survey. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine, 38(4), 411-417.
Thompson, C. (2002). Urban open space in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning , 2, 59–73.
Whyte, W. (1980). The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces (Washington ed.). Conservation Foundation.
Zannin, P., Ferreira, A., & Szeremetta, B. (2006). Evaluation of noise pollution in urban parks. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment , 1, 423–434.
