پیش¬بینی رابطه سازگاری تحصیلی با خودکارآمدی و مهارت اجتماعی
الموضوعات :
1 - دانشجوی دکترای روانشناسی تربیتی، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده روانشناسی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران. نویسنده مسئول Fatemeviyani2470@gmail.com,
الکلمات المفتاحية: خودکار آمدی, دانش آموز, سازگاری تحصیلی, مهارت اجتماعی,
ملخص المقالة :
چکیده مقدمه: سازگاری تحصیلی چندبعدی است و از عوامل متعدد تأثیر می¬پذیرد، پژوهش حاضر با هدف پیش¬بینی سازگاری تحصیلی دانش¬آموزان دوره¬ی اول متوسطه بر اساس خودکار آمدی، مهارت اجتماعی آنان انجام شد. روش پژوهش: روش پژوهش توصیفی و از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعه¬ی آماری پژوهش را کلیه دانش¬آموزان دختر دوره¬ی اول متوسطه شهر همدان به تعداد 4700 نفر تشکیل می¬داد که از بین جامعه¬آماری فوق تعداد 245 نفر دانش آموز دختر با استفاده از روش تصادفی طبقه¬ای نسبی به عنوان نمونه آماری انتخاب شد. جهت¬گردآوری داده¬ها از پرسشنامه‌های خودکارآمدی ماتسون و همکاران و مهارت اجتماعی بار- اّن استفاده شد. داده¬های گردآوری شده با استفاده از ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و رگرسیون چندمتغیری مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت. یافته ها: یافته¬های پژوهش نشان داد، بین سازگاری تحصیلی دانش¬آموزان دختر دوره¬ی اول متوسطه با خودکار آمدی و مهارت اجتماعی رابطه مثبت معنی¬دار وجود دارد. همچنین، نتایج تحلیل رگرسیون چندمتغیری نشان داد متغیرهای خودکار آمدی و مهارت اجتماعی 34 درصد از واریانس سازگاری تحصیلی دانش¬آموزان دختر دوره¬ی اول متوسطه را به طور معنی¬داری پیش¬بینی کنند. نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج نشان داد بین، سازگاری تحصیلی با خودکارآمدی و مهارت اجتماعی دانش آموزان رابطه معناداری وجود دارد.
References
1. Baker RW., Siryk B. Measuring Adjustment to College. Journal of counseling psychology. 2019; 3: 179-189. DOI: 10.12691/education-6-9-13
2. Abramson L., Alloy L., Hankin B., Clements C., Zhu L., Hogan M., Whitehouse W. Optimistic cognitive style and invulnerability to depression. In J. Gillham (ed.) the science of Optimism and Hope (pp. 75-98). Philadelphia, PA: Templesion Founction press; 2018. DOI:10.1037/0021-843X.115.1.145.
3. Abramson LY, Seligman MEP, Teasdal JD. Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal psychology. 2013; 87: 49-74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.87.1.49
4. Ainley J. School and the social development of young Austrians: Farmworkers, outcomes and influences. Paper presented at the 1999 Nation Social Outcome of Schooling Forum organized by the Performance Measurement and Review Branch, Education Queen land, Sufers Paradise, Australia; 2016.
5. American Occupational Therapy Association. Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and practice. American Journal of occupational Therapy. 2020; 56:609-39. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.74S2001
6. Amram Y. The contribution of Emotional and Spiritual Intelligences to Effective Business Leadership, Institute of Transpersonal Psychology, California; 2019. DOI: 10.4236/ojl.2015.42006.
7. Baker RW, Siryk B. Measuring Adjustment to College. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 2013;3: 179-189. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.31.2.179
8. Fredrickson BL. What good are positive emotions? (Electronic version). age of personal control. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016.
9. Pallock LL, Lamborn SD. Beyond parenting practices: Extended kinship support and the academic adjustment of African-American and European-American teens, Journal of-Adolescence. 2016; 29: 813–828. DOI:10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.12.003.
10. Hillary G, Brent M. Emotional, social, and academic adjustment of college students: A longitudinal study of retention. Journal of Counseling and Development. 2015; 281-288. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.34785/J012.2020.803.
11. Roeser RW, Eccles JS, Sameroff AJ. Academic and emotional functioning in early adolescence: Longitudinal relations, patterns, and prediction by experience in middle school. Development and Psychopathology. 2017; 10: 321-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101997.
12. Baker RW, Siryk B. Measuring adjustment to college. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 2016; 31: 179-189. DOI: 10.12691/education-6-9-13.
13. Epstin JB, RobertsonM, Emertson S, Pillips N, Stevenso Moore P. Quality of life and oral function in patients treated with relation therapy for head & neck cancer. Head Neck. 2017; 23: 389-398. DOI:10.1002/HED.1049.
14. Harrison LJ, Clarke L, Ungerer JA. Children’s Drawing Provide a New Perspective on Teacher-Child Relation Quality and School Adjustment. Australia Macquarie University, Early Childhood Research Quarterly. 2018; 55-71. 10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.10.003.
15. Yusliza Mohd Y. Self-Efficacy, Perceived Social Support, and Psychological Adjustment in International Undergraduate Students in a Public Higher Education Institution in Malaysia, Journal of Studies in International Education. 2012; 16 (4):353-371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315311408914.
16. Amram Y, DryerC. The development and preliminary validation of the Integrated Spiritual Intelligence Scale (ISIS). Palo Alto, CA: Institute of Transpersonal Psychology Working Paper; 2017. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/12/1140.
17. Doğutaş, A. Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Teacher Candidates on Readiness to Teaching Profession at a University in Turkey. Iğdır Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2016; (9): 1-24. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/igdirsosbilder/issue/66814/1044855
18. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation, John Willy, New Yourk; 2000. DOI:10.1002/0470846283.
19. Ciarrochi J, Forgas JP, Mayer JD. Emotional intelligence in life. Philadelphia. PA: psychology press. Current Directions in Emotional Intelligence Research. In Lewis, M. et al (eds), Handbook of Emotions. New York, Gilford press; 2021. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203943397.
20. Cohen R, Maunt BM, Strobrl MG, Buif MC. children with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education. 2019; 14:79-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321998072.
21. Enochs WC, Roland CB. Social adjustment of college freshmen: the importance of gender. Journal of Special Education. 2016; 1:11-31. DOI: 10.12691/education-6-9-13.
22. Fairclugh D. Design and Analysis of Quality-of-life Studies in Clinical trials. Chapman & Hall. London; 2000. Doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02304-8.
23. Fersterling F. Attribution: An Introduction to Theories, Research and Applications. Published by psychology press Ltd; 2001. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315804514.
24. Matson JL, Fee VE, Coe DA, Smith D. A Social Skills program for developmentally delayed preschoolers Journal of Clinical Child Psychology. 2013; 20(4): 428-433. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250302400101.
25. Riazie F. Comparison of problem-solving ability and its components in divorced and normal parents with the level of social skills of female children. Master Thesis of Islamic Azad University, Hamadan Branch; 2014. URL: http://jpcp.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-532-en.html
26. Bell J. A secure base. New York: Basic Books; 2018.
27. Khosrow Javid M. Evaluation of validity and construct validity of Shot Social Skills Scale in adolescents. Master Thesis in General Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran; 2017. 10.22034/SSYJ.2020.679056.
28. Bell J. The Bar- on model of emotional- social intelligence (ESI). Psychotherapy, 2006; 18: 13- 25. DOI: 10.4236/mme.2013.31003.
29. Naqshbandi S. Bell compatibility test standardization. Ph.D. dissertation of Islamic Azad University; 2001.
30. Belogini, WC, Stackert RA, Bursik K. Consequences of different kinds of parented discipline. In M.L. Hoffman L.W. Hoffman (Eds), Review of chilled development research, New York: Russel sage foundation; 2013.
31. Hamre BK, Pianta RC. Can instructional and emotional support in the first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure? Child Development. 2005; 76:949–967. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3696607.
32. Goleman D. Emotional Intelligence, Bantam Books, N.Y; 2005.
33. Murris P. Relationships between Self – efficacy and symptoms of anxiety disorders and depression in a normal adolescent sample. Personality and Individual Differences. 2022; 32: 337-348. DOI:10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00027-7
34. Berman KL. The effects of social skills training on the interactions of unpopular and popular press engaged in cooperative tasks. Paper presented at the meeting of the society for Research in Child Development. 2013; 55:151-162. DOI: 10.4236/ce.2019.1012191.
