Material Extrusion AM with Water-soluble Feedstocks: Background, Benefits, and Barriers
الموضوعات : Journal of Environmental Friendly MaterialsA Nouroozi Dehsari 1 , A Askari 2
1 - Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ka.C., Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
2 - Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ka.C., Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
الکلمات المفتاحية: Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing (MEAM), Polyethylene.,
ملخص المقالة :
Material extrusion additive manufacturing (MEAM) has emerged as a versatile and cost-effective technology for fabricating complex three-dimensional components. This review focuses on the integration of water-soluble feedstocks in MEAM, highlighting their potential for environmentally sustainable and efficient manufacturing. Water-soluble polymers such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) serve as critical binder components, enabling the use of water as a debinding agent, which minimizes reliance on hazardous solvents and reduces environmental impact. The composition and optimization of feedstocks—including the balance of polymers, powders, and additives—play a pivotal role in determining rheological behavior, extrusion performance, and the mechanical properties of green and sintered parts. Challenges such as maintaining mechanical strength, managing environmental sensitivity, and ensuring consistency in processing are addressed. Key insights into the relationship between particle morphology, binder molecular weight, and process parameters such as extrusion temperature and nozzle design are meadiscussed. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of current advancements and limitations in using water-soluble feedstocks for MEAM, identifying future research opportunities aimed at enhancing process reliability and sustainability. The findings aim to support the wider adoption of MEAM in diverse applications, , leveraging innovative feedstock designs for more sustainable manufacturing practices
[1] Sadaf M, Bragaglia M, Slemenik Perše L, Nanni F. Advancements in metal additive manufacturing: A comprehensive review of material extrusion with highly filled polymers. J. Manu. Mat. Proc. 2024 ;8(1):14.
[2] Gonzalez-Gutierrez J, Cano S, Schuschnigg S, Kukla C, Sapkota J, Holzer C. Additive manufacturing of metallic and ceramic components by the material extrusion of highly-filled polymers: A review and future perspectives. Mate. 2018; 11(5):840.
[3] Hayat MD, Wen G, Zulkifli MF, Cao P. Effect of PEG molecular weight on rheological properties of Ti-MIM feedstocks and water de-binding behaviour. Powd. Tech. 2015 ;270:296-301.
[4] Manam NS, Harun WS, Ibrahim MH. Experimental study of solvent de-binding on water soluble PEG behavior for water atomised SS 316L compact. InNatl. Conf. Postgrad. Res 2016:187-192.
[5] Miclette O, Côté R, Demers V, Brailovski V. Material extrusion additive manufacturing of low-viscosity metallic feedstocks: Performances of the plunger-based approach. Addit. Manu. 2022 ;60:103252.
[6] Waalkes L, Längerich J, Holbe F, Emmelmann C. Feasibility study on piston-based feedstock fabrication with Ti-6Al-4V metal injection molding feedstock. Addit Manuf. 2020;35:101207.
[7] Hadian A, Fricke M, Liersch A, Clemens F. Material extrusion additive manufacturing of zirconia parts using powder injection molding feedstock compositions. Addit Manuf. 2022 ;57:102966.
[8]Lotfizarei Z, Mostafapour A, Barari A, Jalili A, Patterson AE. Overview of de-binding methods for parts manufactured using powder material extrusion. Addit. Manuf. 2023 ;61:103335.
[9] Sadaf M, Cano S, Gonzalez-Gutierrez J, Bragaglia M, Schuschnigg S, Kukla C, Holzer C, Vály L, Kitzmantel M, Nanni F. Influence of binder composition and material extrusion (MEX) parameters on the 3D printing of highly filled copper feedstocks. Polym. 2022 ;14(22):4962.
[10] Kukla C, Cano S, Kaylani D, Schuschnigg S, Holzer C, Gonzalez-Gutierrez J. De-binding behavior of feedstock for material extrusion additive manufacturing of zirconia. Pow. Metal. 2019 ;62(3):196-204.
[11] Porter MA. Effects of binder systems for metal injection molding. 2003.
[12] Rane K, Strano M. A comprehensive review of extrusion-based additive manufacturing processes for rapid production of metallic and ceramic parts. Adv. Manu. 2019 ;7:155-73.
[13] Chen G, Wen G, Edmonds N, Cao P. Water de-binding behavior of water-soluble Ti-MIM feedstock. Pow. Metal. 2015 ;58(3):220-27. [14] Rane K, Barriere T, Strano M. Role of elongational viscosity of feedstock in extrusion-based additive manufacturing of powder-binder mixtures. Int. J. Adv. Manu. Tech. 2020 ;107(11):4389-402.
[15]Ang X, Tey JY, Yeo WH. 3D printing of low carbon steel using novel slurry feedstock formulation via material extrusion method. Appl. Mat. Today. 2024 ;38:102174.
[16] Eickhoff R, Antusch S, Nötzel D, Hanemann T. New Partially Water-Soluble Feedstocks for Additive Manufacturing of Ti6Al4V Parts by Material Extrusion. Mater. 2023;16(8).
[17] Rau DA, Bortner MJ, Williams CB. A rheology roadmap for evaluating the printability of material extrusion inks. Addi. Manu. 2023 ;75:103745.
[18] Suwanpreecha C, Manonukul A. A review on material extrusion additive manufacturing of metal and how it compares with metal injection moulding. Metal. 2022 ;12(3):429.
[19] Piérard-Smeets A, Dembinski L, Abboudi S. Experimental study of water de-binding on water soluble PEG behavior for SS 316L parts printed by pellet-based additive manufacturing process. InTechnological Systems, Sust. Saf. 2024.
[20] Singh G, Missiaen JM, Bouvard D, Chaix JM. Additive manufacturing of 17–4 PH steel using metal injection molding feedstock: Analysis of 3D extrusion printing, de-binding and sintering. Addi.Manu. 2021 ;47:102287.
[21] Singh G, Missiaen JM, Bouvard D, Chaix JM. Additive manufacturing of 17–4 PH steel using metal injection molding feedstock: Analysis of 3D extrusion printing, de-binding and sintering. Addi. Manuf. 2021 ;47:102287.
[22] Li YM, Liu XQ, Luo FH, Yue JL. Effects of surfactant on properties of MIM feedstock. Trans. Non. Meta. Soc. China. 2007 ;17(1):1-8.
[23] Forstner T, Cholewa S, Drummer D. Influence of wax addition on feedstock processing behavior in additive manufacturing of metals by material extrusion. Prog. Addi. Manuf. 2024 ;9(3):625-32.
[24] Hnatkova E, Hausnerova B, Hales A, Jiranek L, Derguti F, Todd I. Processing of MIM feedstocks based on Inconel 718 powder and partially water-soluble binder varying in PEG molecular weight. Pow. Tech. 2017 ;322:439-46.
[25] Cerejo F, Gatões D, Vieira MT. Optimization of metallic powder filaments for additive manufacturing extrusion (MEX). Int. J. Adv. Manu. Tech. 2021 ;115(7):2449-64.
[26] Marnot A, Koube K, Jang S, Thadhani N, Kacher J, Brettmann B. Material extrusion additive manufacturing of high particle loaded suspensions: a review of materials, processes and challenges. Vir. Phys. Protot. 2023 ;18(1):e2279149.
[27] Annoni M, Giberti H, Strano M. Feasibility study of an extrusion-based direct metal additive manufacturing technique. Proc. Manu. 2016 ;5:916-27.
[28] Zhang H. Development of water-soluble PEG-based binder systems for Ti Metal Injection Moulding (Doctoral dissertation, Res.Space@ Auckland).
[29] Zhang H, Hayat MD, Zhang W, Singh H, Hu K, Cao P. Improving an easy-to-debind PEG/PPC/PMMA-based binder. Polym. 2022 ;262:125465.
