Analyzing the Factors Affecting the Development of Agricultural Mechanization in Kurdistan Province

الموضوعات : Agricultural Extension

Ali Salihi ¹ , Solieman Rasouliazar ²

1 - Institute of Agriculture, Water, Food and Nutraceuticals, Mah.C., Islamic Azad University, Mahabad, Iran
2 - Institute of Agriculture, Water, Food and Nutraceuticals, Mah.C., Islamic Azad University, Mahabad, Iran

تاريخ الإرسال : 20 السبت , جمادى الثانية, 1446 تاريخ التأكيد : 12 الخميس , شوال, 1446 تاريخ الإصدار : 03 الخميس , ربيع الثاني, 1447

الکلمات المفتاحية: Agricultural Mechanization, Effective Factors, Development ,

ملخص المقالة :

The purpose of this study was to analyzing the factors affecting the development of agricultural mechanization in Kurdistan Province. To collect the necessary data, 390 farmers were selected and surveyed using cluster sampling methods. The reliability of the questionnaire was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient (0.85), while its validity was confirmed through the results of a pilot study and evaluations by agricultural experts and university faculty members. The effects of economic, social, and technical factors on the development of agricultural mechanization were analyzed using econometric methods and cross-sectional data from a single crop year in Kurdistan Province. Farmers identified several key obstacles to the adoption of mechanization, including fragmented land plots (56%), shortage of tractors and equipment (41%), high rental costs (70%), lack of timely access to machinery (60%), small land size (50%), inappropriate equipment (56%), and the wide geographical dispersion of their farmland. The estimation of the relationship between independent variables and the dependent variable (agricultural mechanization capacity) indicated that literacy, farming experience, educational attainment, access to credit, and the type of irrigation system had a positive and significant impact on mechanization development. Conversely, the number of land plots and the distance of farms from mechanization service centers and agricultural cooperatives had a negative and significant effect. These findings highlight the critical need for establishing localized mechanization service centers, promoting land consolidation strategies, and providing targeted technical training for farmers particularly in areas with dispersed land holdings as essential measures for advancing agricultural mechanization in Kurdistan Province.

المصادر:

1. Agazhi, Z. D., Mada, M., & Alemu, M. (2024). Production efficiency of wheat farmers in the Arsi Zone, Oromia Region of Ethiopia. Discover Food, 4(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44187-024-00134-3
2. Alizadehnia, M. (2024). Adaptive Analysis of Production Cooperatives with the Functions of Agricultural Innovation Management System: A Case Study of Khuzestan Province. International Journal of Agricultural Science, Research & Technology (IJASRT) in Extension & Education Systems, 14(1), 75 - 85.
3. Amjadi, A., & Chizari, A. H. (2006). Agricultural mechanization in Iran. Agricultural Economics and Development, 14(3), 155-182. doi: 10.30490/aead.2006.58912
4. Anonymous. (2023). The agricultural status of Kurdistan province. Kurdistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center. https://kurdistan.areeo.ac.ir/fa-IR/kurdistan.areeo.ac/38168
5. Autio, A., Johansson, T., Motaroki, L., Minoia, P., & Pellikka, P. (2021). Constraints for adopting climate-smart agricultural practices among smallholder farmers in Southeast Kenya. Agricultural Systems, 194, 103284.
6. Belton, B., & Filipski, M. (2019). Rural transformation in central Myanmar: By how much, and for whom? Journal of Rural Studies, 67, 166–176.
7. Belton, B., Win, M. T., Zhang, X., & Filipski, M. (2021). The rapid rise of agricultural mechanization in Myanmar. Food Policy, 101, 102095.
8. Bigdeli, A. (2009). Study of the development of agricultural mechanization in Hamedan Province. Agronomic Engineering, 3 (2), 117-131.
9. Bradfield, T., Butler, R., Dillon, E., Hennessy, T., & Kilgarriff, P. (2021). The effect of land fragmentation on the technical inefficiency of dairy farms. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72(2), 486–499.
10. Chi, T. T. N. (2010). Factors affecting mechanization in rice harvesting and drying in the Mekong Delta, South Vietnam. Omonrice, 17, 164–173.
11. Daum, T., & Birner, R. (2020). Agricultural mechanization in Africa: Myths, realities and an emerging research agenda. Global Food Security, 26, 100393.
12. Dawane, V. T., Kapse, P. S., Kadam, R. P., Jakkawad, S. R., & Deshmukh, P. R. (2025). Analysis of Socio-Economic Determinants of Farmers’ Attitude towards Online Agricultural Marketing. International Journal of Agricultural Science, Research and Technology in Extension and Education Systems (IJASRT in EESs), 15(1), 1–6. http://ijasrt.iau-shoushtar.ac.ir
13. del Corral, J., Perez, J. A., & Roibas, D. (2011). The impact of land fragmentation on milk production. Journal of Dairy Science, 94(1), 517–525.
14. Diao, X., Takeshima, H., & Zhang, X. (2020). An evolving paradigm of agricultural mechanization development: How much can Africa learn from Asia? Intl Food Policy Res Inst. IFPRI books, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), number 9780896293809
15. Gavgani, M. S., Mohammadzamani, D., & Par-Shokohi, M. G. (2022). Assessment of the factors contributing to the lack of agricultural mechanization in Jiroft, Iran. Open Agriculture, 7(1), 782–793.
16. Guan, N., Liu, L., Dong, K., Xie, M., & Du, Y. (2023). Agricultural mechanization, large-scale operation and agricultural carbon emissions. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 9(1), 2238430.
17. Hiironen, J., & Niukkanen, K. (2014). On the structural development of arable land in Finland–How costly will it be for the climate? Land Use Policy, 36, 192–198.
18. Huo, Y., Ye, S., Wu, Z., Zhang, F., & Mi, G. (2022). Barriers to the development of agricultural mechanization in the North and Northeast China plains: A farmer survey. Agriculture, 12(2), 287.
19. Iyere Freedom, C. J., Onwubuya, E. A., Arigbo, P. O., & Molokwu, R. I. (2024). Determinants of Beneficiaries Level of Utilization of Value Chain Development Programme Services by Cassava Producers in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural Science, Research & Technology (IJASRT) in Extension & Education Systems, 14(2), 133-140.
20. Khumbulani, K., Akwasi Antwi, M., Rubhara, T. T., Nxumalo, K. K. S., Antwi, M. A., & Rubhara, T. T. (2020). Determinants of use of farm mechanization services in emerging farmers, north west province, South Africa. Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, 56(2), 221–228.
21. Krejcie, R. V, & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607–610.
22. Kurniawan A, E., Nurjanana, N., Imang, N., Busari, A., Purwanti, P., & Darma, D. C. (2024). Uncovering the sustainability of agricultural cooperatives in East Kutai, Indonesia. International Journal of Agricultural Science, Research and Technology in Extension and Education Systems, 14(1), 57-74.
23. Latruffe, L., & Piet, L. (2014). Does land fragmentation affect farm performance? A case study from Brittany, France. Agricultural Systems, 129, 68–80.
24. Liu, J., Yasir, H., Tahir, H., & Awan, A. G. (2025). Full mechanization: a path to increased farm income, food security, and environmental quality in developing countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05720-0
25. Looga, J., Jürgenson, E., Sikk, K., Matveev, E., & Maasikamäe, S. (2018). Land fragmentation and other determinants of agricultural farm productivity: The case of Estonia. Land Use Policy, 79, 285–292.
26. Lu, F., Meng, J., & Cheng, B. (2024). How does improving agricultural mechanization affect the green development of agriculture? Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 472, 143298.
27. Maklavani, F. H., Parashkoohi, M. G., Zamani, D. M., & Afshari, H. (2025). Investigating the impact of integrating land consolidation with agricultural mechanization on the technical, energy, and environmental dimensions of paddy production. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 56(1).
28. Mrema, G., Kienzle, J., Headquarters, Mpagalile, J., & Agricultural. (2018). Current Status and Future Prospects of Agricultural Mechanization in Sub-Saharan Africa [SSA]. Ama, Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa & Latin America, 49.
29. Napasintuwong, O., & Emerson, R. D. (2005). Farm Mechanization and the Farm Labor Market: A Socioeconomic Model of Induced Innovation. Working Papers 15652, University of Florida, International Agricultural Trade and Policy Center.
30. Niskanen, O., & Heikkilä, A.-M. (2015). The impact of parcel structure on the efficiency of Finnish dairy farms. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 44(1), 65–77.
31. Orea, L., Perez, J. A., & Roibas, D. (2015). Evaluating the double effect of land fragmentation on technology choice and dairy farm productivity: A latent class model approach. Land Use Policy, 45, 189–198.
32. Panta, B., Pandey, R. P., Ghimire, B., & Neupane, N. (2024). Relevance and determinants of farm mechanization in the diverse geographic context of Nepal. International Journal of Agricultural Extension, 12(2), 253–267.
33. Pawlak, J., Pellizzi, G., & Fiala, M. (2001). Development of agricultural mechanisation to ensure a long-term world food supply. General background information and requirements. Club of Bologna: Proceedings of the 12st Members’ Meeting, Bologna (Italy), 18th-19th November, 2001-XXXII EIMA, 24–47.
34. Qian, L., Lu, H., Gao, Q., & Lu, H. (2022). Household-owned farm machinery vs. outsourced machinery services: The impact of agricultural mechanization on the land leasing behavior of relatively large-scale farmers in China. Land Use Policy, 115, 106008.
35. Rahman, M. S., Miah, M. A. M., Moniruzzaman, M., & Hossain, S. (2011). Impact of farm mechanization on labour use for wheat cultivation in northern Bangladesh. 21(3), 589-594.
36. Razu, M. A. H., Shah, M. F., & Husain, M. B. (2025). A study on the impact of agricultural mechanization and practices of traditional knowledge in agriculture in jhenaidah district, Bangladesh. Humanities Journal, 2(1), 2025002.
37. Reid, J. F. (2011). The impact of mechanization on agriculture. Bridge, 41(3), 22–29.
38. Sharifi, Z., Nooripoor, M., Sharifzadeh, M., & Dehkordi, E. K. (2025). Investigating the Relationship Between Livelihood Capitals and Environmental Attitude: Evidences from Rural Households in Dena County, Iran. International Journal of Agricultural Science, Research & Technology (IJASRT) in Extension & Education Systems, 15(1), 7-17.
39. Sims, B., & Kienzle, J. (2016). Making mechanization accessible to smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. Environments, 3(2), 11-16.
40. Van Loon, J., Woltering, L., Krupnik, T. J., Baudron, F., Boa, M., & Govaerts, B. (2020). Scaling agricultural mechanization services in smallholder farming systems: Case studies from sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Latin America. Agricultural Systems, 180, 102792.
41. Yari, M., & Khadem-AlHosseini, N. (2009). The effect of age and level of formal education and technical training of users on variable costs of conventional tractors in Arak city. Agricultural Scientific Journal, 32(1), 49-57.
42. Zhao, S., Wu, J., & Qiu, T. (2025). The effects of adopting large farms’ agricultural mechanization services on agricultural productivity. Applied Economics, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2025.2451987
43. Zheng, H., Ma, W., Guo, Y., & Zhou, X. (2022). Interactive relationship between non-farm employment and mechanization service expenditure in rural China. China Agricultural Economic Review, 14(1), 84–105.
44. Zhou, X., & Ma, W. (2022). Agricultural mechanization and land productivity in China. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 29(6), 530–542.

نص كامل:



Received: 21 December 2024

Reviewed: 10 February 2025

 Revised: 26 March 2025

Accepted: 10 April 2025 

 

 

 

 

 

Analyzing the Factors Affecting the Development of Agricultural Mechanization in Kurdistan Province

 

Ali Salehi* and Solieman Rasouliazar

Institute of Agriculture, Water, Food and Nutraceuticals, Mah.C., Islamic Azad University, Mahabad, Iran

Corresponding Author Email: [e-mail]

 

T

        

Keywords  Agricultural Mechanization, Effective Factors, Development

Abstract

                he purpose of this study was to analyzing the factors affecting the development of agricultural mechanization in Kurdistan Province. To collect the necessary data, 390 farmers were selected and surveyed using cluster sampling methods. The reliability of the questionnaire was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient (0.85), while its validity was confirmed through the results of a pilot study and evaluations by agricultural experts and university faculty members. The effects of economic, social, and technical factors on the development of agricultural mechanization were analyzed using econometric methods and cross-sectional data from a single crop year in Kurdistan Province. Farmers identified several key obstacles to the adoption of mechanization, including fragmented land plots (56%), shortage of tractors and equipment (41%), high rental costs (70%), lack of timely access to machinery (60%), small land size (50%), inappropriate equipment (56%), and the wide geographical dispersion of their farmland. The estimation of the relationship between independent variables and the dependent variable (agricultural mechanization capacity) indicated that literacy, farming experience, educational attainment, access to credit, and the type of irrigation system had a positive and significant impact on mechanization development. Conversely, the number of land plots and the distance of farms from mechanization service centers and agricultural cooperatives had a negative and significant effect. These findings highlight the critical need for establishing localized mechanization service centers, promoting land consolidation strategies, and providing targeted technical training for farmers particularly in areas with dispersed land holdings as essential measures for advancing agricultural mechanization in Kurdistan Province.

 

 

 

---