Eye Lens Evaluation: Unpacking Performance, Comfort, and Cost through Fermatean Fuzzy Z-Numbers
Shahzaib Ashraf
1
(
Institute of Mathematics, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering & Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan.
)
Sibgha Urooj
2
(
Institute of Mathematics, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering & Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan.
)
Muhammad Shazib Hameed
3
(
Institute of Mathematics, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering & Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan.
)
Chiranjibe Jana
4
(
Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Tamil Nadu, India.
)
الکلمات المفتاحية: Fermatean fuzzy Z-number, Decision Model, Aggregation Information.,
ملخص المقالة :
In this research paper, a comprehensive evaluation of eye lenses is conducted, focusing on three key criteria: performance, comfort, and cost. However, to minimize the chances of large errors attributable to the vagueness and subjectivity of the approach, the Fermatean fuzzy Z-number approach should be employed because it enhances the accuracy of decision-making as it combines the level of uncertainty of the information with the credibility of the opinion of the expert. Moreover, second-order Fermatean fuzzy Z-number weighted averaging and geometric operations are used to fuse the experts’ assessments, which arrive at different aspects. The present paper also defines some basic properties based on Fermat fuzzy Z-numbers and their proofs. To justify the credibility of the results that emerged from the proposed aggregation operators and those of the combined compromise solution method, similar and compromise-similar results were obtained by using the weighted averaging and geometric aggregation to pool the expertise evaluation over multiple attributes. Also, some fundamental properties dependent on Fermat fuzzy Z-numbers and their corresponding proofs are discussed. To overcome this issue and enhance the validity of this research, the results of the proposed aggregation operators have been checked with the combined compromise solution method and found similar outcomes. This paper demonstrates that these modern fuzzy-based methods are suitable for the required structural and balanced ranking of lenses while also providing information about the optimal eye lenses based on various criteria. Besides improving lens assessment capacity, this method also demonstrates the applicability of Fermatean fuzzy Z-numbers in decision-making, which are advantageous for consumers and optical industry professionals.
[1] Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Information and control. 1965; 8(3): 338-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
[2] Banerjee R, Pal SK, Pal JK. A decade of the Z-numbers. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 2022; 30(8): 2800-2812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3094657
[3] Khan MJ, Kumam P, Ashraf S, Kumam W. Generalized picture fuzzy soft sets and their application in decision support systems. Symmetry. 2019; 11(3): 415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11030415
[4] Zadeh LA. A note on Z-numbers. Information sciences. 2011; 181(14): 2923-2932. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.02.022
[5] Jiang W, Xie C, Luo Y, Tang Y. Ranking Z-numbers with an improved ranking method for generalized fuzzy numbers. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology. 2016; 32(3): 1931-1943. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-16139
[6] Jafari R, Yu W, Li X. Numerical solution of fuzzy equations with Z-numbers using neural networks. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing. 2018; 24(1): 151-158. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1080/10798587.2017.1327154
[7] Jafari R, Razvarz S, Gegov A, Paul S. Fuzzy modeling for uncertain nonlinear systems using fuzzy equations and Z-numbers. In: Lotfi A, Bouchachia H, Gegov A, Langensiepen C, McGinnity M. (eds.) Advances in Computational Intelligence Systems: The 18th UK Workshop on Computational Intelligence, 5-7 Sep 2018, Nottingham, UK. Nottingham: Springer, Cham; 2019. p.96-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97982-3 8
[8] Aliev RA, Pedrycz W, Huseynov OH. Hukuhara difference of Z-numbers. Information Sciences. 2018; 466: 13-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.07.033
[9] Bozanic D, Tesic D, Mili A. Multicriteria decision making model with Z-numbers based on FUCOM and MABAC model. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering. 2020; 3(2): 19-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2003019d
[10] Kang B, Wei D, Li Y, Deng, Y. Decision making using Z-numbers under uncertain environment. Journal of computational Information systems. 2012; 8(7): 2807-2814.
[11] Atanassov KT. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 1986; 20(1): 87-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
[12] Yager RR. Pythagorean fuzzy subsets. In: 2013 joint IFSA world congress and NAFIPS annual meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS).IEEE, 24-28 June 2013, Edmonton, Canada. 2013. p.57-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IFSA-NAFIPS.2013.6608375
[13] Yager RR, Abbasov AM. Pythagorean membership grades, complex numbers, and decision making.International journal of intelligent systems. 2013; 28(5): 436-452. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21584
[14] Zhang X, Xu Z. Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. International journal of intelligent systems. 2014; 29(12): 1061-1078. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21676
[15] Yager RR. Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 2013; 22(4): 958-965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989
[16] Wei G, Lu M. Pythagorean fuzzy power aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems. 2018; 33(1): 169-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21946
[17] Peng X, Zhang X. Luo Z. (2020). Pythagorean fuzzy MCDM method based on CoCoSo and CRITIC with score function for 5G industry evaluation. Artificial Intelligence Review. 2020; 53(5), 3813-3847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-019-09780-x
[18] Akram M, Ilyas F, Al-Kenani AN. Two-phase group decision-aiding system using ELECTRE III method in Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. 2021; 46: 3549-3566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-05003-6
[19] Ejegwa PA. Modified Zhang and Xus distance measure for Pythagorean fuzzy sets and its application to pattern recognition problems. Neural Computing and Applications. 2020; 32(14): 10199-10208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04554-6
[20] Naeem M, Ashraf S, Abdullah S, Al-Harbi FM. Redefined maclaurin symmetric mean aggregation operators based on cubic pythagorean linguistic fuzzy numbers. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2021; 1: 5518353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5518353
[21] Molla MU, Giri BC, Biswas P. Extended PROMETHEE method with Pythagorean fuzzy sets for medical diagnosis problems. Soft Computing. 2021; 25: 4503-4512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05458-7
[22] Bakioglu G, Atahan AO. AHP integrated TOPSIS and VIKOR methods with Pythagorean fuzzy sets to prioritize risks in self-driving vehicles. Applied Soft Computing. 2021; 99: 106948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106948
[23] Senapati T, Yager RR. Fermatean fuzzy sets. Journal of ambient intelligence and humanized computing. 2020; 11: 663-674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01377-0
[24] Senapati T, Yager RR. Some new operations over Fermatean fuzzy numbers and application of Fermatean fuzzy WPM in multiple criteria decision making. Informatica. 2019; 30(2): 391-412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2019.211
[25] Senapati T, Yager RR. Fermatean fuzzy weighted averaging/geometric operators and its application in multi-criteria decision-making methods. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 2019; 85: 112-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.05.012
[26] Aydemir SB, Yilmaz Gunduz S. Fermatean fuzzy TOPSIS method with Dombi aggregation operators and its application in multi-criteria decision making. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2020; 39(1): 851-869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-191763
[27] Mishra AR, Rani P, Pandey K. Fermatean fuzzy CRITIC-EDAS approach for the selection of sustainable third-party reverse logistics providers using improved generalized score function. Journal of ambient intelligence and humanized computing. 2022; 13: 295-311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-02902-w
[28] Imran M, Waheed Y, Manzoor S, Bilal M, Ashraf W, Ali M, Ashraf M. Interaction of Hepatitis C virus proteins with pattern recognition receptors. Virology Journal. 2012; 126(9): 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-9-126
[29] Karande P, Chakraborty S. A Fuzzy-MOORA approach for ERP system selection. Decision Science Letters. 2012; 1(1): 11-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2012.07.001
[30] Wang T-C, Lee H-D. Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights. Expert Systems with Applications. 2009; 36(5): 8980-8985. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.035
[31] Kim Y, Chung ES. Fuzzy VIKOR approach for assessing the vulnerability of the water supply to climate change and variability in South Korea. Applied Mathematical Modelling. 2013; 37(22): 9419-9430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2013.04.040
[32] Zeng Y-R, Wang L, He J. A novel approach for evaluating control criticality of spare parts using Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and GRA. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems. 2012; 14(3): 392-401.
[33] Stevic , Vasiljevic M, Puka A, Tanackov I, Junevicius R, Veskovic S. Evaluation of suppliers under uncertainty: a multiphase approach based on fuzzy AHP and fuzzy EDAS. Transport. 2019; 34(1): 52-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2019.7275
[34] Xue Y-X, You J-X, Lai X-D, Liu H-C. An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MABAC approach for material selection with incomplete weight information. Applied Soft Computing. 2016; 38: 703-713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.10.010
[35] Bagal DK, Giri A, Pattanaik AK, Jeet S, Barua A, Panda SN. MCDM optimization of characteristics in resistance spot welding for dissimilar materials utilizing advanced hybrid Taguchi method-coupled CoCoSo, EDAS and WASPAS method. In: Bag S, Paul CP, Baruah M. (eds.) Next Generation Materials
and Processing Technologies: Proceedings in Materials, vol 9. Singapore: Springer; 2021. p.475-490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0182-8 36
[36] Naz S, Ashraf S, Akram M. A novel approach to decision-making with Pythagorean fuzzy information. Mathematics. 2018; 6(6): 95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math6060095
