Phonological Processes in the Baghdadi Gilit Dialect: An Analysis Using Optimality Theory
Abbas Azeez Mohammed Alabid
1
(
Department of English, Faculty of Foreign Languages, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
)
Bahram Hadian
2
(
2Assistant Professor, Department of English, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad
University, Isfahan, Iran
)
Fatinaz Karimi
3
(
Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch
)
الکلمات المفتاحية: Phonology, Baghdadi Gilit Dialect, Optimality Theory, Assimilation, Epenthesis, Deletion,
ملخص المقالة :
This study presents an analysis of the major phonological processes in the Baghdadi Gilit Dialect (BGD) of Iraqi Arabic, using Optimality Theory as the analytical framework. Assimilation, deletion, and epenthesis phenomena are investigated in this study to uncover the underlying constraints governing the phonological system of the dialect. Unique constraint hierarchies shaping BGD's phonology are determined using a corpus of speech data from native speakers. The results show that markedness constraints, especially HARMONY and PARSIMONY, are very strong in determining the surface representations, promoting vowel-consonant harmony and simplification processes in casual speech. Such processes are guided by the interactions of faithfulness and markedness constraints, with BGD prioritizing phonotactic ease and articulatory efficiency. The results also bring into focus important sociolinguistic factors, such as speech register and demographic variation, which influence constraint rankings and phonological variation. This study not only contributes to a deeper understanding of the phonological intricacies of BGD but also offers important insights into the greater field of Arabic linguistics, especially into the study of Bedouin-influenced dialects. The implications for this research go into theoretical phonology and add new evidence for the operation of constraint hierarchies in less well-documented dialects. In addition, the findings of this study have pedagogical implications for teaching Iraqi Arabic, especially BGD, by providing a systematic framework through which to understand its phonological patterns. Computationally, this work provides valuable insights into how to improve natural language processing models for Arabic, allowing them to better handle dialectal variation in speech recognition and synthesis. Thus, this study fills prevailing gaps in the research on Iraqi Arabic and will help set a platform for further research into other dialects of the region, further enhancing Arabic phonology and sociophonetic variation.
Abu-Haidar, F. (1988). Christian Arabic of Baghdad. Otto Harrassowitz.
Abu-Haidar, F. (1991). Christian Arabic of Baghdad. Otto Harrassowitz.
Ahmed, A. (2018). The linguistic composition of Iraq: A sociolinguistic perspective. Arab Journal of Language Studies, 12(3), 215-238.
Al-Ani, S. H. (1970). Arabic phonology: An acoustical and physiological investigation. Mouton.
Alahmari, M. (2018). Phonological processes in Southwestern Saudi Arabic: An Optimality Theoretic analysis. Journal of Semitic Studies, 63(2), 227–243.
Albuarabi, F. (2018). Exploring epenthesis in Bedouin Arabic dialects: A corpus-based analysis. Arabic Linguistics Journal, 9(1), 45-68.
Ali, A. (2014). Sudanese Arabic phonology: Syllable structure and phonological processes. International Journal of Arabic Linguistics, 7(3), 121–138.
Alhawaykim, N. (2018). Sociolinguistic variation in Northwestern Saudi Arabic: An analysis of deletion and assimilation. Linguistic Variation, 12(2), 157–176.
Alshammari, K. (2023). Constraint interaction in Arabic dialects: A sociophonological perspective. Arab Linguistics Quarterly, 15(1), 33-59.
Bellem, A. (2007). Towards a comparative typology of emphatics: The phonetics and phonology of pharyngealization in Semitic. Oxford Semitic Studies, 23(1), 45–78.
Blanc, H. (1964). Communal dialects in Baghdad. Harvard University Press.
Chentir, S., Habash, N., Boujelben, M., & Zribi, I. (2009). Language processing challenges for Arabic dialects: A computational perspective. Journal of Computational Arabic Linguistics, 11(4), 102-121.
Habash, N. (2010). Introduction to Arabic natural language processing. Morgan & Claypool.
Holes, C. (2007). Colloquial Arabic of the Gulf and Saudi Arabia. Routledge.
Jastrow, O. (1994). Phonological processes in Mesopotamian Arabic: The interplay of assimilation and deletion. Semitic Studies Quarterly, 21(4), 195–210.
Jastrow, O. (2006). Urban and Bedouin influences on Mesopotamian Arabic phonology. Journal of Arabic Linguistics, 22(2), 89–112.
McCarthy, J. J. (2008). Doing Optimality Theory: Applying theory to data. Wiley-Blackwell.
Pater, J. (2009). Weighted constraints in OT: Interactions and typological predictions. Linguistic Inquiry, 40(2), 43-85.
Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (1993/2004). Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science.
Salman, H. (2021). Phonological variation in Iraqi Arabic: The impact of speech context on constraint hierarchies. Journal of Sociophonetics, 19(3), 73–95.
Tesar, B., & Smolensky, P. (2004). Learnability in Optimality Theory. MIT Press.
Tseng, C. (2021). Markedness and constraint interactions in Arabic phonology. Phonological Studies Review, 14(1), 67–89.
Watson, J. C. E. (2002). The phonology and morphology of Arabic. Oxford University Press.
Yussif, R., & Mohammed, A. (2023). A sociophonetic comparison of Qəltu and Gilit dialects: Linguistic variation in Iraqi Arabic. Arab Linguistic Horizons, 16(1), 25-52.
