Figures of Speech and Intentions in British Political Interviews
Hayfaa Hussein Ali,
1
(
Department of English Language, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
)
Majid Asgari
2
(
Department of English Teaching, Hidaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hidaj, Iran
)
Baydaa Faisal Noori Al-araji
3
(
Department of English Language and Linguistics, Faculty of Arts, Baghdad University, Iraq
)
Bahram Hadian
4
(
2Assistant Professor, Department of English, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad
University, Isfahan, Iran
)
الکلمات المفتاحية: Figures of Speech, Political Interviews, Metaphor, Persuasion, Stylistic Analysis,
ملخص المقالة :
This paper discusses the use of figures of speech and communicative intentions behind such stylistic choices in British political interviews. By using a qualitative stylistic framework based on the models of Simpson (2004) and Leech and Short (2007), this research investigates the usage of metaphors, similes, and analogies by British politicians between 2009 and 2024. This study has found that such rhetorical devices are strategically utilized to reduce intricacy, create emotional appeals, and command authority. Key findings underline the fact that key metaphors constitute the framing of policies in an accessible and positive light, reinforcement of political positionality through similes, and projection of competence and trust through analogies. This is a very significant lacuna in literature, as almost all previous studies have focused on rhetorical devices in American political speeches rather than British interviews. It tries to show the purposes of such stylistic strategies and allow a bigger understanding of political communication in British contexts to linguists, political strategists, and media analysts. The findings point up the centrality of language in the engendering of public perception and offer insight into the persuasive functions of rhetorical devices in contemporary political discourse.
Ahmed, W., et al. (2023). The role of digital media in political campaigns. Journal of Media Studies, 25(4), 45-67.
Alaghbary, G., et al. (2024). Rhetorical strategies in crisis communication. International Journal of Communication Studies, 12(1), 32-48.
Charteris-Black, J. (2018). Analyzing political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse, and metaphor. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fairclough, N. (2018). Language and power (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Hudson, R. A. (2021). Rhetorical and stylistic approaches to political interviews. Journal of Discourse Studies, 19(2), 143-158.
Jeffries, L. (2017). Critical stylistics: The power of English. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (2016). The all-new don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
Leech, G., & Short, M. (2007). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose (2nd ed.). London: Pearson Education.
Molek-Kozakowska, K. (2020). Discourse and politics: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics: A resource book for students. New York: Routledge.
Stetsyk, Y. (2018). Political interviews as a genre of media discourse. Journal of Linguistic Studies, 14(3), 112-127.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2021). Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wodak, R. (2020). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
