نقش واسطه‌گری اشتیاق تحصیلی در رابطه بین جهت گیری هدف و خود کار آمدی تحصیلی

الموضوعات :

احمدرضا اوجی نژاد ¹ , بهنام عزیزی ²

1 - عضو هیأت علمی دانشگاه مرودشت
2 - دانشجو

تاريخ الإرسال : 14 الثلاثاء , رمضان, 1439 تاريخ التأكيد : 25 الأحد , ربيع الثاني, 1441 تاريخ الإصدار : 25 الجمعة , ربيع الأول, 1441

الکلمات المفتاحية: اشتیاق تحصیلی, جهت گیری هدف, خود کار آمدی,

ملخص المقالة :

هدف از پژوهش حاضر تبیین نقش واسطه­گری اشتیاق تحصیلی در رابطه بین جهت گیری هدف و خود کار آمدی تحصیلی بوده است. روش پژوهش توصیفی و از نوع همبستگی می­باشد. جامعه آماری این پژوهش شامل دانش اموزان پایه هفتم ابتدایی شهر مرودشت بوده­اند. برای تعیین حجم نمونه بر اساس روش نمونه گیری خوشه­ای چند مرحله­ای 150 دانش آموز انتخاب گردید. ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات در این پژوهش شامل 3 پرسشنامه خود کارآمدی تحصیلی جینگ و مورگان، جهت گیری هدف بوفارد و همکاران، پرسشنامه اشتیاق تحصیلی فریدل و پاریس  که روایی و پایایی ابزار مورد تایید قرار گرفت. نتایج ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و تحلیل مسیر حاکی از آن بود که: بین جهت گیری معطوف به تسلط (یادگیری) و جهت گیری معطوف به عملکرد گرایشی با اشتیاق تحصیلی رابطه مستقیم معنادار و بین جهت گیری معطوف به عملکرد پرهیزی با  اشتیاق تحصیلی  رابطه معنا دار وجود دارد. جهت گیری هدف معطوف به یادگیری قادر به پیش‌بینی اشتیاق تحصیلی آن­ها می‌باشد. اشتیاق تحصیلی با خود کار آمدی تحصیلی  رابطه مستقیم معنا دار دارد. اشتیاق تحصیلی در رابطه بین متغیرهای جهت گیری هدف و خود کار آمدی تحصیلی  نقش واسطه­ای معناداری ایفا می­کند.   

  

المصادر:

 

• Abbasi, Muslim, Pirani, Zabih.(2015). The role of seduction and self-regulating motivation in        predicting students' academic eagerness. Journal of Education in Medical Sciences, No. 15, pp. 160-169   


• Abedini, Yasmine, Hejazi, Ellahes, Sajjadi, Hossein, Tabataba'i, Mahmoud. (2009). The role of     mediator of educational involvement in the relationship between avoidance-performance goals and academic achievement in female students in human sciences, Journal of Educational and Psychological Research, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 65-78.


• Akhlaghi, Mehri; Talepadsand, Siavash. (2015). Effectiveness of Multidimensional              Psychological Cognitive Interventions on Task Value, Purposefulness Orientation and Academic Autoregression in First Level High School, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 11, No. 36, Pages 111-129.


• Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Fallu, J. S. &Pagani L. S. (2009). Student engagement and itsrelationship with early high school dropout.Journal of Adolescence, 32, 651-670.


• Astin, A.W. (2006). Making Sense of out of degree completion rates. Journal of College StudentRetention,7, (1),, 5-17.


• Ataee Far, Robabeh and Shaghaghi, Farhad (2011). The relationship of goal orientation, self-regulation learning with academic progress in third-year students of mathematical physics and humanities. Quarterly Journal of Education and Research, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 43-28.


• Bandura,  A, (2006), Adolescent  development  from  an  agnatic perspective.


• Bandura, A(2001). Guide of constructing self- Efficacy scales. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford university.


• Bang,I.,& Stromso,H.(2004). Epistemological belief and implicit theories of intelligence as predictors of achievement goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 374-388.


• Bang.F. C.(2004) Future time orientation predicts academic engagement among first-year university students. British Journal _ Educational Psychology,703–718.


• Bashpour, Sajjad; Nasri Nasrabadi, Behnam (2015). A Study of the Relationship between Academic Passion and Self-Efficacy among Students at Mohaghegh Ardabili University, International Conference on Research Findings in Psychology and Educational Sciences


• Caprara, G. V. , Barbaranelli, C. , Steca, P. , & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers' self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students' academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 473–490.


• Chun, P. C., Lauer, J. and Patashnick, M. (2004). Individual Differences in Academic Motivation: Perceived Ability, Goals, Beliefs and Values. Learning and Individual Differences. 1, 63-84.


• Church M, Elliot A, Gable S.(2009) Perception of classroom environment, achievement goals and achievement outcomes. J Educ Psychol.93(1):43-54.


• Elliot A.( 2004) Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. J Educ Psychol.; 34(3):169-90.


• Elliot, A & Church, M, (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation, Journal of personality and social psychology, 218-232. 72


• Elliot, A & McGregor, H, (2001). A 22 achievement goal framework, Journal of personality and social psychology, 80(3), 501-519.


• Elliot, A., & McGregor, H. (2008). A 2×2 achievement goal framework, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, pp 951 – 971.


• Elliot, A., McGregor, H.A. (2001).2 *2 Achivement goal farme work. journal of personality.3,501-519.


• Elliot, A., McGregor, H.A., Gable, S. (1999). Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology. 91. 549-563.


• Elliot, A.J, (1997).Integrating the "classic" and "contemporary" approach to achievement: a hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation HN M.Maher& Pintrich (Eds), Advances in motivation and achievement, 10, 143-179.


• Elliot, A.J., & Harackiewicz, J.M. (2008). Approach andavoidance achievement goal and intrinsic motivation: A mediation analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461-475.


• Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school.Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117-142.


• Finn, Jeremy D(1993)..Academic success among students at risk for school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 221-234.


• Genzalz, C. & Urdan, T. (2002). Academic self-handicapping and performance goals: A further examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1), 61–75.


• Jackson, W.(2002). Enhancing Self-efficacy and learning performance. Journal of Experimental Education, 7,243-255.


• Kaprara A, Martin L, Maehr L.(2006) The contributions and prospects of goal  orientation theory. J Educ Psychol Rev.19(2):141-84.


• Karso. LM.(2006), How student and parent goal orientations and classroom goal structures influence the math achievement of African Americans during the high school transition. J Contemp Educ Psychol. 2006;31(1):44-63.


• Khojostmaehr, Reza, Abbaspour, Zabihala, and Karaya, Amin, and Kochaki, Rahim. (2012). Effect of educational achievement program on performance and self-concept, attitude towards school, learning success in school and social adjustment of students. Journal of Psychology School, No. 45, 56-27.


• Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001) Performance-approach goals


• Naiami, Abdul Zahra. (2011). Relationship between the dimensions of academic motivation and the enthusiasm of third year high school students in Ahvaz. Master thesis of Ahvaz University.


• Pajares, F. & Miller, D.M.(1997). Mathematics self – efficacy and mathematical


• Peezi, Maryam; Shahravar, Mehrnaz; Farzad, Valiollah; Safaii, Parivash (2007). The Effectiveness of Exercise Tools Training on Happiness and Academic Achievement of Secondary School Students in Tehran High School Students, Psychological Studies: Volume 3, Number 4; From page 25 to page 43.


• Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544-555.


• Pintrich, P.R & Linnenbrink, E.A.  (2003). The role of self efficacy belifes in studend engagement and Learning in the classroom. Reading and writing Quartery, 19, 119-127.


• Pintrich, P.R & Linnenbrink, E.A.  (2003). The role of self efficacy belifes in studend engagement and Learning in the classroom. Reading and writing Quartery, 19, 119-127.


• Psychology, 80,3.260-267.


• Seif, Ali Akbar.( 2003). Educative psychology. Sixth Edition. Tehran: Doran Publications.


• Seif, Diba( 2015). Prediction of Math Self-efficacy Based on Objectives Oriented among Students with Academic Excellence, Education and Learning Studies (Social Sciences and Humanities at Shiraz University): Volume 7, Issue 2, Page 21 to Page 40.


• Shariatmadari, Mehdi (2009). The Relationship between Organizational Health and the Effectiveness of Managers of Education Management Schools in Tehran, Journal of Education and Evaluation, Second Year, No. 6, pp. 151-119.


• sheii, D. (2012). (Re)conceptualising student engagement: Doing education not doing time. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1765-1776.


• Strabeel, T (2011). Development and datametric properties of a scale measuring students perception of the classroom assessment environment. International Journal of Instruction   .Vol 4, No 1,106-120.


• Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91.


• Zolali, Behrooz, Ghorbani, Fatemeh( 2014). Comparison of Academic Motivation and School Excitement in Students with and Without Dyslexia,journal of Learning Disabilities, Volume 3, Number 4; From page 44 to page 58.